Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Article
Nature 412, 150-157 (12 July 2001) | doi:10.1038/35084005; Received 21 May 2001; Accepted 19 June 2001
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
-
Methods to Analyze Consumer Emotions
The Seeker is looking for methods to analyze consumer emotions. This Challenge requires only a writ...
nature jobs
Professor of Experimental Virology (W3)
- University Hospital Jena, Institute of Virology and Antivirale Therapy
- Jena, Germany
John Innes Centre Project Leader in Plant or Microbial Sciences
- University of East Anglia
- Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Nikos K. Logothetis, Jon Pauls, Mark Augath, Torsten Trinath & Axel Oeltermann
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
Correspondence to: Nikos K. Logothetis Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to N.K.L. (e-mail: Email: nikos.logothetis@tuebingen.mpg.de).
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is widely used to study the operational organization of the human brain, but the exact relationship between the measured fMRI signal and the underlying neural activity is unclear. Here we present simultaneous intracortical recordings of neural signals and fMRI responses. We compared local field potentials (LFPs), single- and multi-unit spiking activity with highly spatio-temporally resolved blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI responses from the visual cortex of monkeys. The largest magnitude changes were observed in LFPs, which at recording sites characterized by transient responses were the only signal that significantly correlated with the haemodynamic response. Linear systems analysis on a trial-by-trial basis showed that the impulse response of the neurovascular system is both animal- and site-specific, and that LFPs yield a better estimate of BOLD responses than the multi-unit responses. These findings suggest that the BOLD contrast mechanism reflects the input and intracortical processing of a given area rather than its spiking output.
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
Correspondence to: Nikos K. Logothetis Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to N.K.L. (e-mail: Email: nikos.logothetis@tuebingen.mpg.de).
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).

