Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Motion direction, speed and orientation in binocular matching

Abstract

The spatial differences between the images seen by the two eyes, called binocular disparities, can be used to recover the volumetric (three-dimensional) aspects of a scene. The computation of disparity depends upon the correct identification of corresponding features in the two images. Understanding what image features are used by the brain to solve this matching problem is one of the main issues in stereoscopic vision1. Many cortical neurons in visual areas V1 (ref. 2), MT (refs 3, 4) and MST (refs 5, 6) that are tuned to binocular disparity are also tuned to orientation, motion direction and speed. Although psychophysical work has shown that motion direction7 can facilitate binocular matching, the psychophysical literature on the role of orientation is mixed8,9, and it has been argued that speed differences are ineffective in aiding correspondence7. Here we use a different psychophysical paradigm to show that the visual system uses similarities in orientation, motion direction and speed to achieve binocular correspondence. These results indicate that cells that multiplex orientation, motion direction, speed and binocular disparity may help to solve the binocular matching problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Top view of the geometry of the binocular matching problem.
Figure 2: Experimental procedure.
Figure 3: Results of experiment 1 showing the role of bar orientation and bar number.
Figure 4: Results of experiments 2 and 3 showing the roles of motion direction and speed.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Howard, I. P. & Rogers, B. J. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Poggio, G. F. & Talbot, W. H. Mechanisms of static and dynamic stereopsis in foveal cortex of the rhesus monkey. J. Physiol. 315, 469–492 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley, D. C., Qian, N. & Andersen, R. A. Integration of motion and stereopsis in middle temporal cortical area of macaques. Nature 373, 609–611 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maunsell, J. H. & Van Essen, D. C. Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. J. Neurophysiol. 49, 1148–1167 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy, J. P. & Wurtz, R. H. The role of disparity-sensitive cortical neurons in signalling the direction of self-motion. Nature 348, 160–162 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roy, J. P., Komatsu, H. & Wurtz, R. H. Disparity sensitivity of neurons in monkey extrastriate area MST. J. Neurosci. 12, 2478–2492 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bradshaw, M. F. & Cumming, B. G. The direction of retinal motion facilitates binocular stereopsis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 1421–1427 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayhew, J. E. & Frisby, J. P. Stereopsis masking in humans is not orientationally tuned. Perception 7, 431–436 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mansfield, J. S. & Parker, A. J. An orientation-tuned component in the contrast masking of stereopsis. Vision Res. 33, 1535–1544 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers, B. J. & Graham, M. E. Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Res. 22, 261–270 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bradshaw, M. F. & Rogers, B. J. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in the computation of depth. Vision Res. 36, 3457–3468 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tittle, J. S. & Braunstein, M. L. Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion. Percept. Psychophys. 54, 157–169 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Richards, W. Structure from stereo and motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 343–349 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B. & Young, M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Res. 35, 389–412 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Julesz, B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

R.v.E. was supported by a NIH grant awarded to B.A. and by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, and B.A was supported in part by NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barton L. Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Ee, R., Anderson, B. Motion direction, speed and orientation in binocular matching. Nature 410, 690–694 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35070569

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35070569

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing