Figures and Tables
From the following article:
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
and International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium
Nature 409, 860-921(15 February 2001)
Figure 2
Idealized representation of the hierarchical shotgun sequencing strategy.
Full size figure and legend (49K)Figure 3
The automated production line for sample preparation at the Whitehead Institute, Center for Genome Research.
Full size figure and legend (84K)Figure 4
Total amount of human sequence in the High Throughput Genome Sequence (HTGS) division of GenBank.
Full size figure and legend (33K)Figure 5
Positions of markers on previous maps of the genome (the Genethon101 genetic map and Marshfield genetic map (http://research.marshfieldclinic.org/genetics/genotyping_service/mgsver2.htm ), the GeneMap99 radiation hybrid map100, and the Whitehead YAC and radiation hybrid map29) plotted against their derived position on the draft sequence for chromosome 2.
Full size figure and legend (136K)Figure 6
The key steps (a–d) in assembling individual sequenced clones into the draft genome sequence.
Full size figure and legend (28K)Figure 8
Cumulative distributions of several measures of clone level contiguity and sequence contiguity.
Full size figure and legend (61K)Figure 12
Histogram of GC content of 20-kb windows in the draft genome sequence.
Full size figure and legend (36K)Figure 14
Number of CpG islands per Mb for each chromosome, plotted against the number of genes per Mb (the number of genes was taken from GeneMap98 (ref.100)).
Full size figure and legend (20K)Figure 15
Distance in cM along the genetic map of chromosome 12 plotted against position in Mb in the draft genome sequence.
Full size figure and legend (50K)Figure 16
Rate of recombination averaged across the euchromatic portion of each chromosome arm plotted against the length of the chromosome arm in Mb.
Full size figure and legend (26K)Figure 17
Almost all transposable elements in mammals fall into one of four classes.
Full size figure and legend (21K)Figure 18
Age distribution of interspersed repeats in the human and mouse genomes.
Full size figure and legend (96K)Figure 19
Median ages and per cent of the genome covered by subfamilies of DNA transposons.
Full size figure and legend (35K)Figure 20
Comparison of the age of interspersed repeats in eukaryotic genomes.
Full size figure and legend (31K)Figure 22
Density of the major repeat classes as a function of local GC content, in windows of 50 kb.
Full size figure and legend (44K)Figure 23
Alu elements target AT-rich DNA, but accumulate in GC-rich DNA.
Full size figure and legend (49K)Figure 24
DNA transposon copies in AT-rich DNA tend to be younger than those in more GC-rich DNA.
Full size figure and legend (41K)Figure 25
Distribution of various LINE cohorts as a function of local GC content.
Full size figure and legend (57K)Figure 26
Comparison of the Alu density of each chromosome as a function of local GC content.
Full size figure and legend (56K)Figure 27
Substitution patterns in interspersed repeats differ as a function of GC content.
Full size figure and legend (37K)Figure 28
Interspersed repeats tend to diminish the differences between GC bins, despite the fact that GC-rich transposable elements (specifically Alu) accumulate in GC-rich DNA, and AT-rich elements (LINE1) in AT-rich DNA.
Full size figure and legend (41K)Figure 29
Higher substitution rate on chromosome Y than on chromosome X.
Full size figure and legend (15K)Figure 35
Size distributions of exons, introns and short introns, in sequenced genomes.
Full size figure and legend (63K)Figure 38
Distribution of the homologues of the predicted human proteins.
Full size figure and legend (21K)Figure 39
Simplified cladogram (relationship tree) of the 'many-to-many' relationships of classical nuclear receptors.
Full size figure and legend (52K)Figure 40
Number of distinct domain architectures in the four eukaryotic genomes, predicted using SMART339.
Full size figure and legend (30K)Figure 41
Number of different Pfam domain types that co-occur in the same protein, for each of the 10 most common domain families in each of the five eukaryotic proteomes.
Full size figure and legend (46K)Figure 44
Relative expansions of protein families between human and fly.
Full size figure and legend (32K)Figure 45
Lineage-specific expansions of domains and architectures of transcription factors.
Full size figure and legend (54K)Figure 47
Distribution of number of genes per conserved segment between human and mouse genomes.
Full size figure and legend (26K)Figure 48
Distribution of lengths (in 5-Mb bins) of conserved segments between human and mouse genomes, omitting singletons.
Full size figure and legend (26K)Figure 49
Number of human paralogues of genes having single orthologues in worm and fly.
Full size figure and legend (17K)Table 2
Total genome sequence from the collection of sequenced clones, by sequence status
Full size table and legendTable 11
Number of copies and fraction of genome for classes of interspersed repeat
Full size table and legendTable 16
Fraction of finished sequence in inter- and intrachromosomal duplications
Full size table and legendTable 17
Fraction of the draft genome sequence in inter- and intrachromosomal duplications
Full size table and legendTable 18
Cross-species comparison for large, highly homologous segmental duplications
Full size table and legendTable 23
Properties of genome and proteome in essentially completed eukaryotic proteomes
Full size table and legendTable 25
The most populous InterPro families in the human proteome and other species
Full size table and legendTable 27
New paralogues of common drug targets identified by searching the draft human genome sequence
Full size table and legend
















































