Raw data are useful for researchers wishing to replicate the results of an experiment. Care needs to be taken when, as with brain-imaging measurements, such data can be misused or misinterpreted.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Test-retest measurements and digital validation for in vivo neuroscience
Scientific Data Open Access 20 January 2015
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whose scans are they, anyway?. Nature 406, 443 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35020214
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35020214
This article is cited by
-
Editorial: What the New White House Rules on Equitable Access Mean for the Neurosciences
Neuroinformatics (2023)
-
Test-retest measurements and digital validation for in vivo neuroscience
Scientific Data (2015)
-
Sharing primary data: a threat or asset to discovery?
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2002)
-
Databasing fMRI studies — towards a 'discovery science' of brain function
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2002)