Abstract
Eukaryotic gene expression is mediated by compact cis-regulatory modules, or enhancers, which are bound by specific sets of transcription factors1. The combinatorial interaction of these bound transcription factors determines time- and tissue-specific gene activation or repression. The even-skipped stripe 2 element controls the expression of the second transverse stripe of even-skipped messenger RNA in Drosophila melanogaster embryos, and is one of the best characterized eukaryotic enhancers2,3,4. Although even-skipped stripe 2 expression is strongly conserved in Drosophila, the stripe 2 element itself has undergone considerable evolutionary change in its binding-site sequences and the spacing between them. We have investigated this apparent contradiction, and here we show that two chimaeric enhancers, constructed by swapping the 5′ and 3′ halves of the native stripe 2 elements of two species, no longer drive expression of a reporter gene in the wild-type pattern. Sequence differences between species have functional consequences, therefore, but they are masked by other co-evolved differences. On the basis of these results, we present a model for the evolution of eukaryotic regulatory sequences.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnone, M. I. & Davidson, E. H. The hardwiring of development: organization and function of genomic regulatory systems. Development 124, 1851–1864 (1997).
Frasch, M. & Levine, M. Complementary patterns of even-skipped and fushi tarazu expression involve their differential regulation by a common set of segmentation genes in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1, 981–995 (1987).
Goto, T. P., Macdonald, P. & Maniatis, T. Early and late periodic patterns of even-skipped expression are controlled by distinct regulatory elements that respond to different spatial cues. Cell 57, 413–422 (1989).
Harding, K., Hoey, T., Warrior, R. & Levine, M. Autoregulatory and gap response elements of the even-skipped promoter of Drosophila. EMBO J. 8, 1205–1212 (1989).
Stanojevic, D., Small, S. & Levine, M. Regulation of a segmentation stripe by overlapping activators and repressors in the Drosophila embryo. Science 254, 1385–1387 (1991).
Small, S., Blair, A. & Levine, M. Regulation of even-skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 11, 4047–4057 (1992).
Arnosti, D., Barolo, S., Levine, M. & Small, S. The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy. Development 122, 205–214 (1996).
Hewitt, G. F. et al. Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila giant protein: cis element positioning provides an alternative means of interpreting an effector gradient. Development 126, 1201–1210 (1999).
Ludwig, M. Z., Patel, N. H. & Kreitman, M. Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change. Development 125, 949–958 (1998).
Ludwig, M. Z. & Kreitman, M. Evolutionary dynamics of the enhancer region of even-skipped in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 1002–1011 (1995).
Beverly, S. M. & Wilson, A. C. Molecular evolution in Drosophila and the higher Diptera II. A time scale for fly evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 21, 1–13 (1984).
Small, S., Arnosti, D. N. & Levine, M. Spacing ensures autonomous expression of different stripe enhancers in the even-skipped promoter. Development 119, 767–772 (1993).
Kimura, M. Possibility of extensive neutral evolution under stabilizing selection with special reference to non-random usage of synonymous codons. Proc. Natl Acad Sci. USA 78, 5773–5777 (1981).
Kimura, M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983).
Ohta, T. & Tachida, H. Theoretical study of near neutrality. I. Heterozygosity and rate of mutant substitution. Genetics 126, 219–229 (1990).
Long, A. D., Lyman, R. F., Langley, C. H. & Mackay, T. F. Two sites in the Delta gene region contribute to naturally occurring variation in bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 149, 999–1017 (1998).
Gibson, G. & Hogness, D. S. Effect of polymorphism in the Drosophila regulatory gene Ultrabithorax on homeotic stability. Science 271, 200–203 (1996).
Lawrence, C. E. et al. Detecting subtle sequence signals: a Gibbs sampling strategy for multiple alignment. Science 262, 208–214 (1993).
Berg, O. G. & von Hippel, P. H. Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins. Statistical–mechanical theory and application to operators and promoters. J. Mol. Biol. 193, 723–750 (1987).
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Small and J. Comeron for helpful discussions. This work was supported by NSF grants to M.K. and M.Z.L. N.H.P. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ludwig, M., Bergman, C., Patel, N. et al. Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element. Nature 403, 564–567 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35000615
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35000615
This article is cited by
-
Multiple stages of evolutionary change in anthrax toxin receptor expression in humans
Nature Communications (2021)
-
Characterization of the CCAAT-binding transcription factor complex in the plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Deep learning suggests that gene expression is encoded in all parts of a co-evolving interacting gene regulatory structure
Nature Communications (2020)
-
Dynamic evolution of regulatory element ensembles in primate CD4+ T cells
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2018)
-
Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation
BMC Systems Biology (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.