Abstract
Lek mating systems are characterized by males displaying in groups. The main benefit from group display is thought to be an increase in the number of females arriving per male. However, when mating success is highly skewed it is not clear why unsuccessful males participate in group display1. In theory, all males on leks could obtain indirect fitness benefits if displaying groups consisted of related individuals2. Here we present two independent sets of data that show that peacocks (Pavo cristatus) display close to their kin. DNA fingerprinting showed that males at Whipsnade Park were more closely related to males within the same lek than to males at other leks. Separately, we found that after an experimental release of a mixed group of related and unrelated males, brothers (paternal sibs or half-sibs) established permanent display sites very close together. This result is unexpected, as the released birds could not become familiar with their brothers during their development. The released young were hatched from eggs that had been removed from their parents shortly after laying and mixed with the eggs of non-relatives. These data indicate that birds can evolve a means of kin association that does not involve learning the characteristics of relatives or the use of environmental cues. If social learning is not necessary for kin association then kin effects may be of more widespread importance in avian social interactions, and in particular in the evolution of lek mating, than previously appreciated.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Höglund,J. & Alatalo,R. V. Leks (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1995).
Kokko,H., Lindström,J. Kin selection and the evolution of leks: whose success do young males maximise? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 919–923 (1996).
Kokko,H., Sutherland,W. J., Lindström,J., Reynolds,J. D. & Mackenzie,A. Individual mating success, lek stability, and the neglected limitations of statistical power. Anim. Behav. 56, 755–762 (1998).
Alatalo,R. V., Höglund,J., Lundberg,A. & Sutherland,W. J. Evolution of black grouse leks—female preferences benefit males in larger leks. Behav. Ecol. 3, 53–59 (1992).
Widemo,F. & Owens,I. P. F. Lek size, male mating skew and the evolution of lekking. Nature 373, 148–151 (1995).
Petrie,M., Halliday,T. & Sanders,C. Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim. Behav. 41, 323–332 (1991).
Manly,B. F. Randomisation, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology 2nd edn (Chapman & Hall, London, 1997).
Bruford,M. W., Hanotte,O., Brookfield,J. F. Y. & Burke,T. in Molecular Genetic Analysis of Populations: A Practical Approach 2nd edn (ed. Hoelzel, A. R.) 287–336 (IRL, Oxford, 1998).
Petrie,M. Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature 371, 598–599 (1994).
Höglund,J., Alatalo,R. V., Lundberg,A., Rintamäki,P. T. & Lindell,J. Microsatellite markers reveal the potential for kin selection on black grouse leks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 813–816 (1999).
Lacy,R. C. & Sherman,P. W. Kin recognition by phenotype matching. Am. Nat. 121, 489–512 (1983).
Grosberg,R. K. & Quinn,J. F. The genetic control and consequences of kin recognition by the larvae of a colonial marine invertebrate. Nature 322, 457–459 (1986).
Potts,W. K., Manning,C. J. & Wakeland,E. K. Mating patterns in semi-natural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature 352, 619–621 (1991).
Getz,W. M. & Smith,K. B. Genetic kin recognition: honey bees discriminate between full and half sisters. Nature 302, 148 (1983).
Grafen,A. Do animals really recognise kin? Anim. Behav. 39, 42–54 (1990).
Alexander,R. D. Epigenetic rules and Darwinian algorithms: the adaptive study of learning and development. Ethol. Sociobiol. 11, 241–303 (1990).
Sherman,P. W. Multiple mating and kin recognition by self-inspection. Ethol. Sociobiol. 12, 377–386 (1991).
Sherman,P. W., Reeve,H. K. & Pfennig,D. W. in Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 4th edn (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 69–97 (Blackwell Science, Oxford, 1997).
Blaustein,A. R., Bekoff,M. & Daniels,T. J. in Kin Recognition in Animals (eds Fletcher, D. J. C. & Michener, C. D.) 287–332 (Wiley, New York, 1987).
Hanotte,O., Burke,T., Armour,J. A. L. & Jeffreys,A. J. Hypervariable minisatellite DNA sequences in the Indian peafowl Pavo cristatus. Genomics 9, 587–597 (1991).
Manly,B. F. J. RT, A Program for Randomization Testing, version 2.1. (Centre for Applied Statistics and Mathematics, University of Otago, 1997).
Acknowledgements
This study was initiated while M.P. was at the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford and A.K. and T.B. were at the Department of Biology, University of Leicester. We thank the Zoological Society of London for permission to study the peafowl at Whipsnade Wild Animal Park; L. Lovett for help at Whipsnade; Q. Spratt for allowing M.P. To work at his peacock farm; A. Williams for help at the farm; P. Carpenter for help in scoring gels; E. Bell and A. Askew for writing computer programs; J. Brookfield for advice; J. Futter for help with producing Figures; B. Hatchwell, M. Young, G. Roberts, F. Ratnieks and P. Watt for comments on the manuscript; and the NERC and the BBSRC for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petrie, M., Krupa, A. & Burke, T. Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues. Nature 401, 155–157 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/43651
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/43651
This article is cited by
-
Fore reef location influences spawning success and egg predation in lek-like mating territories of the bird wrasse, Gomphosus varius
Environmental Biology of Fishes (2021)
-
Kin-dependent dispersal influences relatedness and genetic structuring in a lek system
Oecologia (2019)
-
Kin discrimination allows plants to modify investment towards pollinator attraction
Nature Communications (2018)
-
The importance of the altricial – precocial spectrum for social complexity in mammals and birds – a review
Frontiers in Zoology (2017)
-
Fine-scale genetic structure among greater sage-grouse leks in central Nevada
BMC Evolutionary Biology (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.