Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A complete primitive rhizodont from Australia

Abstract

Studies of the origin1,2,3 and developmental genetics4,5,6,7 of tetrapod limbs have focused attention on the need to identify the precise type of sarcopterygian (lobe-finned fish) fin from which limbs evolved. This can only be achieved through a phylogenetic analysis of sarcopterygians. Sarcopterygian fin skeletons vary in structure8,9; use of an inappropriate fin skeleton as a model limb precursor will lead to erroneous inferences about the evolution of morphology and the developmental pathways at the fish–tetrapod transition. The pectoral fin of the rhizodont sarcopterygian Sauripteris is strikingly limb-like and features prominently in discussions about the origin of limbs3,7,10,11,12,13,14. It is thus important to establish the phylogenetic position of rhizodonts. However, their anatomy is incompletely known15,16. Published phylogenetic analyses are based on poorly substantiated characters, such as the alleged presence of two external nostrils in the Australian genus Barameda17,18. Here we present, from the Upper Devonian period of Canowindra, Australia, the most primitive and by far the most complete rhizodont discovered so far. It has a single external nostril but possesses no other derived tetrapod-like features. Our new evidence shows that rhizodonts are more remote from tetrapods than are osteolepiform18 and elpistostegid19 lobe-fin fishes. Similarities between rhizodont fins and tetrapod limbs are thus probably convergent, and the pectoral fin of Sauripteris should not be used as a model limb precursor.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Specimens AMF 9680, 100073 and 99900 of Gooloogongia loomesi.
Figure 2: Reconstructions of Gooloogongia loomesi, ?Strepsodus anculonamensis and Barameda.
Figure 3: Relationships between rhizodonts, Eusthenopteron, Panderichthys tetrapods.
Figure 4: Morphology of ?Sauripteris, Gooloogongia, Panderichthys and Acanthostega.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coates, M. I. & Clack, J. A. Polydactyly in the earliest known tetrapod limbs. Nature 347, 66–69 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Coates, M. I. The Devonian tetrapod Acanthostega gunnari Jarvik: postcranial anatomy, basal tetrapod interrelationships and patterns of skeletal evolution. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 87, 363–421 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shubin, N. The evolution of paired fins and the origin of tetrapod limbs. Evol. Biol. 28, 39–85 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shubin, N. H. & Alberch, P. Amorphogenetic approach to the origin and basic organization of the tetrapod limb. Evol. Biol. 20, 319–387.

  5. Coates, M. I. in Developmental Patterning of the Vertebrate Limb (eds Hinchliffe, J. R., Hurle, J. M. & Summerbell, D.) 325–337 (Plenum, New York, (1991)).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Sordino, P., van der Hoeven, F. & Duboule, D. Hox gene expression in teleost fins and the origin of vertebrate digits. Nature 375, 678–681 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shubin, N., Tabin, C. & Carroll, S. Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388, 639–648 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andrews, S. M. & Westoll, T. S. The postcranial skeleton of rhipidistian fishes excluding Eusthenopteron. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 68, 391–489 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahlberg, P. E. Paired fin skeletons and relationships of the fossil group Porolepiformes (Osteichthyes: Sarcopterygii). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 96, 119–166 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gregory, W. K. The limbs of Eryops and the origin of paired limbs from fins. Science 33, 508–509 (1911).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Broom, R. On the origin of the cheiropterygium. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 32, 459–464 (1913).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Romer, A. S. The Vertebrate Body (W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, (1949)).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schmalhausen, I. I. The Origin of Terrestrial Vertebrates. (Academic, New York, (1968)).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daeschler, E. & Shubin, N. Fish with fingers? Nature 391, 133 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Andrews, S. M. Rhizodont crossopterygian fish from the Dinantian of Foulden, Berwickshire, Scotland, with a re-evaluation of this group. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 76, 67–95 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cloutier, R. & Ahlberg, P. E. in Interrelationships of Fishes (eds Stiassny, M. L. J., Parenti, L. R. & Johnson, G. D.) 445–479 (Academic, San Diego, (1996)).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Long, J. A. Anew rhizodontiform fish from the Early Carboniferous of Victoria, Australia, with remarks on the phylogenetic position of the group. J. Vert. Palentol. 9, 1–17 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahlberg, P. E. Are-examination of sarcopterygian interrelationships, with special reference to the Porolepiformes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 103, 241–287 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jarvik, E. Basic Structure and Evolution of VertebratesVol. 1 (Academic, New York, (1980)).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Young, G. C. in Palaeozoic Vertebrate Biostratigraphy and Biogeography (ed. Long, J. A.) 208–251 (Belhaven, London, (1993)).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vorobyeva, E. I. & Schultze, H.-P. in Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods: Controversy and Consensus (eds Schultze, H.-P. & Trueb, L.) 68–109 (Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY, (1991)).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schultze, H.-P. & Arsenault, M. The panderichthyid fish Elpistostege: a close relative of tetrapods? Paleontology 28, 293–309 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schultze, H.-P. Dipnoans as sarcopterygians. J. Morphol. 1 (suppl.), 39–74 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Clack, J. A. Acanthostega gunnari, a Devonian tetrapod from Greenland; the snout, palate and ventral parts of the braincase, with a discussion of their significance. Meddr. Grønland Geoscience 31, 1–24 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Australian Museum for their award of a Visiting Fellowship to P.E.A. A. Ritchie for inviting us to work on the Canowindra material and J. Long and J. Jeffery for discussions and access to rhizodont material. Z.J. thanks J. Fairfax for financial support. This Letter is dedicated to the memory of S. M. Andrews.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johanson, Z., Ahlberg, P. A complete primitive rhizodont from Australia. Nature 394, 569–573 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/29058

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/29058

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing