Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Astrometric signatures of giant-planet formation

Abstract

The discovery1,2,3,4,5,6 of giant planets orbiting nearby solar-type stars raises anew the question of how they formed. Two very different mechanisms have been proposed. Gravitational instability7,8 is the process by which planets form directly from the gas in the accrection disk around the young star. The other alternative is core accretion9,10, where rocky cores of about 10 Earth masses form, followed by the hydrodynamical accretion of gas. Here I show that these processes have very different astrometric signatures, and that it is observationally possible to distinguish between them. Planets that form through gravitational instabilities do so rapidly, so that within just a few hundred years of the onset of the instability the nascent planet is making the young stellar object wobble in its orbit. This can be seen in the youngest stellar objects, with ages as little as 0.1 Myr. If planets form by core accretion, an observable wobble will not be visible for 10–20 Myr. Observations of a suitable ensemble of optically visible young stellar objects (such as those in the Taurus molecular cloud) over a period of several decades should be able to determine which of the two processes is responsible for giant-planet formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Positional (x–y) wobble induced in a solar-mass protostar surrounded by a protoplanetary disk undergoing a gravitational in stability leading to the formation of two giant gaseous protoplanets (GGPPs).
Figure 2: Time evolution of the protostellar wobble, given as the radial displacement r from the centre of mass of the system.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gatewood, G. Lalande 21185. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 28, 885 (1996).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayor, M. & Queloz, D. AJupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star. Nature 378, 355–359 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Butler, R. P. & Marcy, G. W. Aplanet orbiting 47 Ursae Majoris. Astrophys. J. 464, L153–L156 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Williams, E., Hauser, H. & Shirts, P. Three new “51 Pegasi-Type” planets. Astrophys. J. 474, L115–L118 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cochran, W. D., Hatzes, A. P., Butler, R. P. & Marcy, G. W. The discovery of a planetary companion to 16 Cygni B. Astrophys. J. 483, 457–463 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Noyes, R. W.et al. Aplanet orbiting the star Rho Coronae Borealis. Astrophys. J. 483, L111–L114 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuiper, G. P. On the origin of the solar system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 37, 1–14 (1951).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boss, A. P. Giant planet formation by gravitational instability. Science 276, 1836–1839 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pollack, J. B. Origin and history of the outer planets: theoretical models and observational constraints. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 22, 389–424 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lissauer, J. J. Timescales for planetary accretion and the structure of the protoplanetary disk. Icarus 69, 249–265 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wetherill, G. W. Formation of the Earth. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 18, 205–256 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pollack, J. B.et al. Formation of the giant planets by concurrent accretion of solids and gas. Icarus 124, 62–85 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Adams, F. C., Ruden, S. P. & Shu, F. H. Eccentric gravitational instabilities in nearly Keplerian disks. Astrophys. J. 347, 959–975 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Laughlin, G. & Bodenheimer, P. Nonaxisymmetric evolution in protostellar disks. Astrophys. J. 436, 335–354 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Trilling, D.et al. Orbital evolution and migration of giant planets: modeling extrasolar planets. Astrophys. J.(in the press).

  16. Gatewood, G. On the astrometric detection of neighboring planetary systems. Icarus 27, 1–12 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Beckwith, S. V. W., Sargent, A. I., Chini, R. S. & Güsten, R. Asurvey for circumstellar disks around young stellar objects. Astron. J. 99, 924–945 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boss, A. P. & Myhill, E. A. Protostellar hydrodynamics: constructing and testing a spatially and temporally second-order accurate method. I. Spherical coordinates. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 83, 311–327 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boss, A. P. Evolution of the solar nebula. III. Protoplanetary disks undergoing mass accretion. Astrophys. J. 469, 906–920 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Toomre, A. On the gravitational stability of a disk of stars. Astrophys. J. 139, 1217–1238 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Snyder Hale, A., Gatewood, G. D., Hale, D. D. S., Persinger, W. T. & McMillan, R. S. The multichannel astrometric photometer with spectrograph: A new instrument for the characterization of extrasolar planetary systems. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. XXVIII, 1359–1360 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Swanson, P. Keck Interferometer Implementation Plan (Jet Propulsion Lab., Pasadena, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Allen, R. J., Peterson, D. & Shao, M. Proc. SPIE 2871, 504–515 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank D. Spergel for prompting this investigation through a cogent question, and J.Graham for improvements to the manuscript. The calculations were performed on the DEC Alpha workstations of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. This research was partially supported by NASA's Planetary Geology and Geophysics Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan P. Boss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boss, A. Astrometric signatures of giant-planet formation. Nature 393, 141–143 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/30177

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/30177

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing