Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Critical behaviour and the evolution of fault strength during earthquake cycles

Nature volume 388, pages 865–868 (1997)Cite this article

Abstract

The problem of how fault rheology and heterogeneity interact to produce the observed scaling of earthquakes (such as the power-law moment–frequency relationship) remains largely unsolved. Rock friction experiments have elucidated the properties of smooth faults1,2,3, but seem insufficient to explain the observed complexity of real fault dynamics4,5. The recognition of a connection between fault-related processes and critical phenomena in other physical systems, together with numerical models of repeated earthquakes, have resulted in significant progress in the theoretical interpretation of earthquake scaling4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. But fault rheology and heterogeneity have so far been treated separately. Here I attempt to unify the requirements of fault rheology and heterogeneity using numerical calculations of quantized slip in an elastic continuum. I show that cyclical fault strength evolves naturally by means of a statistical selection for high-strength fault patches (asperities), resulting in the accumulation and eventual failure of those asperities. The applicability of these results to real fault systems is supported by a recent analysis of time-dependent earthquake statistics15. These results imply that self-similarity and criticality on a fault emerge during an earthquake cycle, and suggest that the character of local seismicity can be useful in earthquake forecasting by revealing how advanced a fault is within its cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Domain-averaged time series of stress σ / μ (a), yield strength σ y / μ (b) and slip ΔL, where ΔU is the domain-averaged slip (c).
Figure 2: a–d, Images of relative amounts of total slip ΔU for the four moments in time marked in Fig. 1.
Figure 3: a–d Images of the total slip ΔU for a model quake sequence.
Figure 4: a, Domain-averaged ratio of stress to yield strength σ / σ y for n = (3–8) × 105 for the last three characteristic cycles illustrated in Fig.1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dieterich, J. H. Modeling of rock friction 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2161–2168 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ruina, A. Slip instability and state variable friction laws. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 10359–10370 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beeler, N. M., Tullis, T. E. & Weeks, J. D. The roles of time and displacement in the evolution effect in rock friction. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 1987–1990 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rice, J. R. Spatio-temporal complexity of slip on a fault. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 9885–9907 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rice, J. R. & Ben-Zion, Y. Slip complexity in earthquake fault models. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 3811–3818 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bak, P. & Tang, C. Earthquakes as a self-organized critical phenomenon. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 15635–15637 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sornette, D. in Spontaneous Formation of Space-Time Structures and Criticality(eds Riste, T. & Sherrington, D.) 57–106 (Proc. NATO, ASI, Ser C, 349 Kluwer, Dordrecht, (1991)).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, H. J., Bergersen, B. & Chen, K. Self-organized ruptures in an elastic medium: a possible model for earthquakes. J. Phys. A 25, L1251–L1256 (1992).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Rundle, J. B. & Klein, W. Scaling and critical phenomena in a cellular automaton slider-block for earthquakes. J. Statist. Phys. 72, 405–413 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rundle, J. B., Klein, W. & Gross, S. Dynamics of a traveling density wave model for earthquakes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4285–4289 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Main, I. Statistical physics, seismogenesis, and seismic hazard. Rev. Geophys. 34, 433–462 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burridge, R. & Knopoff, L. Model and theoretical seismicity. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 57, 341–371 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rydelek, P. A. & Sacks, S. Earthquake slip rise time and rupture propagation: Numerical results of the quantum earthquake model. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86, 567–574 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ben-Zion, Y. Stress, slip, and earthquakes in models of complex single-fault systems incorporating brittle and creep deformations. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 5677–5706 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nadeau, R. M. Characterization and application of microearthquake clusters to problems of scaling, fault zone dynamics, and seismic monitoring at Parkfield, California. Thesis, Univ. California, Berkeley, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scholz, C. H. The critical slip distance for seismic faulting. Nature 36, 761–763 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Scholz, C. H. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting(Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, (1990)).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Power, W. L., Tullis, T. E. & Weeks, J. D. Roughness and wear during brittle faulting. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 15268–15287 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Power, W. L. & Tullis, T. E. Euclidean and fractal models for the description of rock surface roughness. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 415–424 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schmittbuhl, J., Gentier, S. & Roux, S. Field measurements of the roughness of fault surfaces. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 639–641 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, S. R. & Scholz, C. H. Closure of rock joints. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 4939–4948 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marone, C. & Kilgore, B. Scaling of the critical slip distance for seismic faulting with shear strain in fault zones. Nature 362, 618–621 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heimpel, M. Earthquake size-frequency relations from an analytical stochastic rupture model. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 22435–22448 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Andrews, D. J. Astochastic fault model 1. Static case. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 3876–3877 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rundle, J. Derivation of the complete Gutenberg-Richter magnitude-frequency relation using the principle of scale invariance. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 12337–12342 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank M. M. Wheelock for discussions. This work was supported in part by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Additional research was carried out during a visit to Johns Hopkins University, supported by the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Geophysik, Universität Göttingen, D-37075, Gttingen, Germany

    Moritz Heimpel

Authors
  1. Moritz Heimpel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moritz Heimpel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heimpel, M. Critical behaviour and the evolution of fault strength during earthquake cycles. Nature 388, 865–868 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/42232

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/42232

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing