Nature 370, 563 - 566 (18 August 1994); doi:10.1038/370563a0

Archetypal organization of the amphioxus Hox gene cluster

Jordi Garcia-Fernàndez^* & Peter W. H. Holland^*†

Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3PS, UK
^*Present addresses: Departament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 645, 08071 Barcelona, Spain (J.G.-F.); and School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 228, Reading RG6 2AJ, UK (P.W.H.H.).
^†To whom correspondence should be addressed.

ORGANIZATION into gene clusters is an essential and diagnostic feature of Hox genes¹. Insect and nematode genomes possess single Hox gene clusters (split in Drosophila); in mammals, there are 38 Hox genes in four clusters on different chromosomes^2,3. A collinear relationship between chromosomal position, activation time and anterior expression limit of vertebrate Hox genes suggests that clustering may be important for precise spatiotemporal gene regulation and hence embryonic patterning^2,4. Hox genes have a wide phylogenetic distribution within the metazoa, and are implicated in the control of regionalization along the anteroposterior body axis^2,5. It has been suggested that changes in Hox gene number and genomic organization played a role in metazoan body-plan evolution^6–8, but identifying significant changes is difficult because Hox gene organization is known from only very few and widely divergent taxa (principally insects, nematodes and vertebrates)³. Here we analyse the complexity and organization of Hox genes in a cephalochordate, amphioxus, the taxon thought to be the sister group of the vertebrates⁹. We find that the amphioxus genome has only one Hox gene cluster. It has similar genomic organization to the four mammalian Hox clusters, and contains homologues of at least the first ten paralogous groups of vertebrate Hox genes in a collinear array. Remarkably, this organization is compatible with that inferred for a direct ancestor of the vertebrates; we conclude that amphioxus is a living representative of a critical intermediate stage in Hox cluster evolution.

References

1.	Scott, M. Cell 71, 551−553 (1992). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
2.	McGinnis, W. & Krumlauf, R. Cell 68, 283−302 (1992). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
3.	Bürglin, T. & Ruvkun, G. Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev. 3, 615−620 (1993).
4.	Izpisúa-Beimonte, J.-C. et al. EMBO J. 10, 2279−2289 (1991). | PubMed |
5.	Slack, J. M. W., Holland, P. W. H. & Graham, C. F. Nature 361, 490−492 (1993). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
6.	Akam, M. et al. Development 104, suppl., 123−133 (1988).
7.	Kappen, C., Schughart, K. & Ruddle, F. H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 5459−5463 (1989). | ChemPort |
8.	Holland, P. W. H. BioEssays 14, 267−273 (1992). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
9.	Willey, A. Amphioxus and the Ancestry of the Vertebrates (Macmillan, New York, 1894).
10.	Kappen, C. & Ruddle, F. H. Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev. 3, 931−938 (1993). | ChemPort |
11.	Schubert, F. R., Nieselt-Struwe, K. & Gruss, P. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 143−147 (1993). | ChemPort |
12.	Holland, P. W. H., Garcia-Fernàndez, J., Holland, L. Z., Williams, N. A. & Holland, N. D. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. 74, 49−60 (1994). | ChemPort |
13.	Holland, P. W. H., Holland, L. Z., Williams, N. A. & Holland, N. D. Development 116, 653−661 (1992). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
14.	Izpisúa-Belmonte, J.-C. et al. Nature 350, 585−589 (1991). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
15.	Acampora, D. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 10385−10402 (1989). | PubMed | ChemPort |
16.	Rubock, M. J. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 4751−4755 (1990). | ChemPort |
17.	Pendleton, J. W., Nagai, B. K., Murtha, M. T. & Ruddle, F. H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 6300−6304 (1993). | ChemPort |
18.	Dekker, E.-J. et al. Mech. Dev. 40, 3−12 (1992).
19.	Belleville, S. et al. Gene 114, 179−186 (1992). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
20.	Molven, A., Hordvik, I. & Njolstad, P. R. Biochim. biophys. Acta 1173, 102−106 (1993). | PubMed | ChemPort |
21.	Sansom, I. J., Smith, M. P., Armstrong, H. A. & Smith, M. M. Science 256, 1308−1311 (1992). | PubMed | ChemPort |
22.	Tabin, C. J. Development 116, 289−196 (1992). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
23.	Lundin, L. Genomics 16, 1−19 (1993). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
24.	Bürglin, T. in A Guidebook for Homeobox Genes (ed. Duboule, D.) 25−71 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994).
25.	Kappen, C., Schughart, K. & Ruddle, F. H. Genomics 18, 54−70 (1993). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
26.	Schughart, K., Utset, M. F., Awgulewitsch, A. & Ruddle, F. H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 5582−5586 (1988). | ChemPort |
27.	Holland, P. W. H. in Essential Developmental Biology: A Practical Approach (eds Stern, C. D. & Holland, P. W. H.) 243−255 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993). | ChemPort |
28.	Webster, P. J. & Mansour, T. E. Mech. Dev. 38, 25−32 (1992). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
29.	Bürglin, T. R., Finney, M., Coulson, A. & Ruvkun, G. Nature 341, 239−243 (1989). | Article | PubMed | ISI |