Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finches

Abstract

FLUCTUATING asymmetries are the small random deviations from symmetry that occur in the development of bilaterally symmetrical traits1. Such asymmetries are believed to be a direct indicator of phenotypic, perhaps genotypic, quality2. Relative levels of asymmetry are much greater in secondary sexual characters than in normal morphological traits2. It has been proposed that females use the amount of asymmetry in secondary sexual ornamentation as a cue in mate choice3, because the highest quality individuals have the most symmetrical, as well as elaborate, ornaments2–10. Using a choice chamber similar to that in ref. 11, we show here that female zebra finches choose symmetrically leg-banded males over asymmetrically banded ones. This demonstrates unequivocally that females use symmetry as a criterion in partner preference, although whether the symmetry preference is specific to secondary sexual characters is unknown.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ludwig, W. Das Rechts-Links Problem im Tiereich und beim Menschen (Springer, Berlin, 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Møller, A. P. & Pomiankowski, A. Genetica (in the press).

  3. Møller, A. P. Nature 357, 238–240 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Manning, J. T. & Hartley, M. A. Anim. Behav. 42, 1020–1021 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Møller, A. P. Anim Behav. 40, 1185–1187 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Møller, A. P. Proc. R. Soc. B248, 199–206 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Møller, A. P. & Höglund, J. Proc. R. Soc. B245, 1–5 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thornhill, R. Behav. Ecol. 3, 277–283 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thornhill, R. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30, 357–363 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thornhill, R. & Sauer, P. Anim. Behav. 43, 255–264 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burley, N., Krantzberg, G. & Radman, P. Anim. Behav. 30, 444–455 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Valen, L. Evolution 16, 125–142 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bradbury, J. W. & Andersson, M. B. Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives (Wiley, Chichester, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Møller, A. P. Proc. R. Soc. B243, 59–62 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burley, N. Auk 102, 647–651 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burley, N. Am. Nat. 127, 415–455 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Burley, N. Anim. Behav. 34, 1732–1741 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burley, N. Evolution 40, 1191–1206 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Burley, N. Ethology 76, 133–151 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Burley, N. Am. Nat. 132, 611–628 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Burley, N. Anim. Behav. 36, 1235–1237 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Burley, N. Science 211, 721–722 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryan, M. J., Fox, J. H., Wilczynski, W. & Rand, A. S. Nature 343, 66–67 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Basolo, A. L. Science 250, 808–810 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Enquist, M. & Arak, A. Nature 361, 446–448 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Russell, E. S. A. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 57, 597–605 (1954).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Beardmore, J. A. Heredity 14, 411–422 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Endler, J. A. & McLellan, T. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 395–421 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. SPSS Inc. SPSSx User'ls Guide 3rd edn (SPSS Inc., Chicago, 1988).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swaddle, J., Cuthill, I. Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finches. Nature 367, 165–166 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/367165a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/367165a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing