Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod

Abstract

THREE genetically discrete male morphs coexist in Paracerceis sculpta, a Gulf of California marine isopod1–5. The large α males defend harems within intertidal sponges, the smaller β males mimic female behaviour and morphology, and the tiny γ males invade and sequester themselves within large harems. If selection is responsible for maintaining this polymorphism, then the mean fitness of each male morph must be equal over time6–9. Here we report that average reproductive success is equivalent among the three male morphs in monthly population samples collected over two years. We have investigated the total opportunity for sexual selection within and among morphs, and find that < 0.10% of the total opportunity for sexual selection occurs among morphs. Furthermore, alleles responsible for the expression of this polymorphism conform to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, indicating the absence of differential natural selection among morphs. Conditions necessary for stable coexistence of three alternative male reproductive strategies seem to exist in nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shuster, S. M. J. crust. Biol. 7, 318–327 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shuster, S. M. Evolution 43, 1683–1698 (1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baitoo, H., Shuster, S. M. & Sassaman, C. Am. Zool. 28, 134A.

  4. Shuster, S. M. Anim. Behav. 40, 390–399.

  5. Shuster, S. M. & Wade, M. J. Anim. Behav. (in the press).

  6. Eberhard, W. G. Am. Nat. 119, 420–426 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Austad, S. N. Am. Zool. 24, 309–320 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gadgil, M. Am. Nat. 106, 574–580 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Slatkin, M. Am. Nat 114, 384–398 (1979).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Wade, M. J. & Arnold, S. J. Anim. Behav. 28, 446–461 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wade, M. J. Am. Nat. 114, 742–746 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wade, M. J. in Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives (eds Bradbury, J. W. & Andersson, M. B.) 197–207 (Wiley, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parker, G. A. J. Anim. Ecol. 39, 205–228 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van Rhijun, J. G. Behaviour 47, 153–229 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Warner, R. R., Robertson, D. R. & Leigh, E. G. Science 190, 633–638 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perrill, S. A., Gerhardt, H. C. & Daniel, R. Science 200, 1170–1180 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alcock, J. in Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (eds Blum, M. S. & Blum, N. A.) 381–402 (Academic, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gross, M. R. & Charnov, E. L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 6937–6948 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Thornhill, R. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 355–386 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guiness, F. E. & Albon, S. O. Red Deer: The Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes (University of Chicago Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Howard, R. D. Am. Zool. 24, 397–406 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Christiansen, T. E. Am. Zool. 24, 321–332 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Borowsky, B. Physiol. Zool. 58, 497–502 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuris, A. M., Ra'anan, Z., Sagi, A. & Cohen, D. J. crust. Biol. 7, 219–237 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alados, C. L. Behav. Proc. 12, 145–158 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Petersen, C. W. Anim. Behav. 35, 1601–1614 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brodsky, L. M. Anim. Behav. 36, 335–342 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cade, W. Science 212, 563–564 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hedrick, A. V. Am. Nat. 132, 267–276 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ryan, M. J. & Causey, B. J. Behavl Ecol. Sociobiol. 24, 341–348 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shuster, S., Wade, M. Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. Nature 350, 608–610 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/350608a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/350608a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing