Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
   
Wednesday 25 November 2009
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 348, 455 - 458 (29 November 1990); doi:10.1038/348455a0

The mitochondrial chaperonin hsp60 is required for its own assembly

Ming Y. Cheng, F.-Ulrich Hartl* & Arthur L. Norwich

Howárd Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Human Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA
*Institut für Physiologische Chemie der Universität Munchen, Goethestrasse 33, 8000 Munchen 2, Germany

HEATSHOCK protein 60 (hsp60) in the matrix of mitochondria is essential for the folding and assembly of newly imported proteins1. Hsp60 belongs to a class of structurally related chaperonins found in organelles of endosymbiotic origin and in the bacterial cytosol2–9. Hsp60 monomers form a complex arranged as two stacked 7-mer rings6. This 14-mer complex binds unfolded proteins at its surface, then seems to catalyse their folding in an ATP-dependent process10. The question arises as to how such an assembly machinery is itself folded and assembled. Hsp60 subunits are encoded by a nuclear gene and translated in the cytosol as precursors7 which are translocated into mitochondria and proteolytically processed. In both intact cells and isolated mitochondria of the hsp60-defective yeast mutant mif4, self-assembly of newly imported wild-type subunits is not observed. Functional pre-existing hsp60 complex is required in order to form new, assembled, 14-mer. Subunits imported in vitro are assembled with a surprisingly fast half-time of 5–10 min, indicative of a catalysed reaction. These findings are further evidence that self-assembly may not be the principal mechanism by which proteins attain their functional conformation in the intact cell.

------------------

References
1. Cheng, M. Y. et al. Nature 337, 620−625 (1989). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
2. Laskey, R. A., Honda, B. M., Mills, A. D. & Finch, J. T. Nature 275, 416−420 (1978). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
3. Ellis, R. J. & Hemmingsen, S. M. Trends biochem. Sci. 14, 339−342 (1989). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
4. Rothman, J. E. Cell 59, 591−601 (1989). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
5. Barraclough, R. & Ellis, R. J. Biochim. biophys. Acta 608, 19−31 (1980). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
6. McMullen, T. W. & Hallberg, R. L. Molec. cell. Biol. 8, 371−380 (1988). | PubMed | ChemPort |
7. Reading, D. S., Hallberg, R. L. & Myers, A. M. Nature 337, 655−659 (1989). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
8. Hemmingsen, S. M. et al. Nature 333, 330−334 (1988). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
9. Goloubinoff, P., Christeller, J. T., Gatenby, A. A. & Lorimer, G. H. Nature 342, 884−889 (1989). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
10. Ostermann, J., Horwich, A. L., Neupert, W. & Hartl, F.-U. Nature 341, 125−130 (1989). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
11. Luck, D. J. L. J. Cell Biol. 24, 461−470 (1965). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
12. Hartl, F.-U. & Neupert, W. Science 247, 930−938 (1990). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
13. Laemmli, U. K. Nature 227, 680−685 (1970). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
14. Cheng, M. Y. thesis, Yale Univ. (1990).
15. Pelham, H. R. B. & Jackson, R. J. Eur. J. Biochem. 67, 247−256 (1976). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
16. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T. & Gordon, J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 4350−4354 (1979). | ChemPort |
17. Musgrove, J. E., Johnson, R. A. & Ellis, R. J. Eur. J. Biochem. 163, 529−543 (1987). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
18. Bahr, G. F. & Zeitler, E. J. Cell Biol. 15, 489−501 (1962). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
19. Lissin, N. M., Venyaminoy, S. Y. & Girshovich, A. S. Nature 348, 339−342 (1990). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |



© 1990 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy