Nature 342, 796 - 797 (14 December 1989); doi:10.1038/342796a0

Worker policing in the honeybee

Francis L. W. Ratnieks^* & P. Kirk Visscher^†

^*Department of Entomology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94870, USA
^†Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA

IN most species of social Hymenoptera with queen–worker dimorphism, workers cannot mate but retain functional ovaries¹; because males arise from unfertilized haploid eggs, workers can potentially produce males. Worker-derived males are frequent in some species, but in others occur only in queenless colonies^2,3. Workers are more related to their own sons (coefficient of 0.5) than to the queen's sons (their brothers; 0.25); they are also more related to nephews (0.375) than brothers if queens mate with one male, but if queens mate with more than two unrelated males a worker's mean rela tedness to nephews is less than to brothers^3–5. In this case workers could benefit by 'worker policing'^3,5: prevent-ing each other from producing males, perhaps by destroying worker-laid eggs or by aggression toward reproductive workers. Worker reproduction is rare in queenright colonies of species with multiply mated queens (such as honeybees⁶ and some yellowjacket wasps⁷), but is common in some monandrous species (bumblebees and stingless bees³). Here we describe experiments showing strong discrimination by honeybee (Apis mellifera) workers against worker-laid male eggs, supporting the worker-policing hypothesis. The honeybee was studied because queens mate with 10–20 males⁸, making worker policing seem likely as a cause for the rarity of worker-derived males (about one in a thousand males is worker-derived⁶).

References

1.	Oster, G. F. & Wilson, E. O. Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. (Princeton University Press, 1978).
2.	Bourke, A. F. G. Q. Rev. Biol. 63, 291−311 (1988). | Article | ISI |
3.	Ratnieks, F. L. W. Am. Nat. 132, 217−236 (1988). | Article | ISI |
4.	Hamilton, W. D. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3, 193−232 (1972). | Article |
5.	Starr, C. K. 1984 in Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. (ed. Smith, R. L.) 428−459 (Academic, Orlando, Florida, 1984).
6.	Visscher, P. K. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25, 247−254 (1989). | Article |
7.	Ross, K. G. Nature 323, 798−800 (1986). | Article |
8.	Page, R. E. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 31, 297−320 (1986). | Article |
9.	Taber, S. J. Econ. Entomol. 54, 247−250 (1961).
10.	Visscher, P. K. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, 453−460 (1986).
11.	Page, R. E. & Erickson, E. H. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23, 117−126 (1988). | Article | ISI |
12.	Laidlaw, H. H. Contemporary Queen Rearing (Dadant. Hamilton, Illinois, 1979).
13.	Ratnieks, F. L. W. thesis, Cornell Univ. (1989).
14.	Lloyd, J. E. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 28, 131−160 (1983). | Article |
15.	Trivers, R. L. & Hare, H. Science 191, 249−263 (1976). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |