Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Selective deficit of visual search in moving displays after extrastriate damage

Abstract

A VISUAL cue that is often associated with significant stimuli, such as those provided by prey and predators, is movement relative to the observer. An efficient visual system should be able to direct attention to those parts of the visual field that contain such stimuli. What is needed is a system that can filter by movement difference. This could direct attention to a moving item among stationary items, or an item moving in one direction against a background moving in a different direction. Visual search experiments have shown that people are indeed able to filter by movement; that is, they can attend to just the moving items in arrays of moving and stationary stimuli1. Single-cell recordings from monkey visual cortex show that the medial temporal cortical area (MT) has some of the properties required to filter by movement2–4. We have now linked these two observations by showing that a patient with bilateral lesions to the presumed human homologue of MT cannot restrict visual attention to the moving items in arrays of both moving and stationary items. This suggests that MT is the site of a movement filter used in normal visual processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McLeod, P., Driver, J. & Crisp, J. Nature 332, 154–155 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Felleman, D. & Kaas, J. J. Neurophysiol. 52, 488 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Albright, T. J. Neurophysiol. 52, 1106–1130 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Allman, J., Miezin, F. & McGuinness, E. Perception 14, 105–126 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zihl, J., von Cramon D. & Mai, N. Brain 106, 313–340 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Treisman, A. & Gelade, G. Cognit. Psychol. 12, 97–136 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Treisman, A. Q. J. exp. Psychol. 40, 201–238 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLeod, P., Heywood, C., Driver, J. et al. Selective deficit of visual search in moving displays after extrastriate damage. Nature 339, 466–467 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/339466a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/339466a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing