Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
   
Tuesday 24 November 2009
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 339, 300 - 301 (25 May 1989); doi:10.1038/339300a0

Genetic segregation and the maintenance of sexual reproduction

Mark Kirkpatrick & Cheryl D. Jenkins

Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA

SEXUAL reproduction confronts evolutionary biology with a paradox: other things being equal, an asexual (all-female) population will have twice the reproductive potential of a competing sexual population and therefore should rapidly drive the sexual population to extinction1,2. Thus, the persistence of sexual reproduction in most life forms implies a compensatory advantage to sexual reproduction. Work on this problem has emphasized the evolutionary advantages produced by the genetic recombination that accompanies sexual reproduction1–7. Here we show that genetic segregation produces an advantage to sexual reproduction even in the absence of an advantage from recombination. Segregation in a diploid sexual population allows selection to carry a single advantageous mutation to a homozygous state, whereas two separate mutations are required in a parthenogenetic population. The complete fixation of advantageous mutations is thus delayed in a heterozygous state in asexual populations. Calculation of the selective load incurred suggests that it may offset the intrinsic twofold reproductive advantage of asexual reproduction and maintain sexual reproduction in diploid populations.

------------------

References
1. Williams, G. C. Sex and Evolution (Princeton University Press, 1975).
2. Maynard Smith, J. The Evolution of Sex (Cambridge University Press, 1978).
3. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd edn (Dover, New York, 1958).
4. Muller, H. J. Am. Nat. 66, 118−138 (1932). | Article |
5. Michod, R. E. & Levin, B. R. (eds) The Evolution of Sex: an Examination of Current Ideas (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1988).
6. Kondrashov, A. S. Nature 336, 435−440 (1988). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
7. Bell, G. The Masterpiece of Nature (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982).



© 1989 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy