Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Genetic segregation and the maintenance of sexual reproduction

Abstract

SEXUAL reproduction confronts evolutionary biology with a paradox: other things being equal, an asexual (all-female) population will have twice the reproductive potential of a competing sexual population and therefore should rapidly drive the sexual population to extinction1,2. Thus, the persistence of sexual reproduction in most life forms implies a compensatory advantage to sexual reproduction. Work on this problem has emphasized the evolutionary advantages produced by the genetic recombination that accompanies sexual reproduction1–7. Here we show that genetic segregation produces an advantage to sexual reproduction even in the absence of an advantage from recombination. Segregation in a diploid sexual population allows selection to carry a single advantageous mutation to a homozygous state, whereas two separate mutations are required in a parthenogenetic population. The complete fixation of advantageous mutations is thus delayed in a heterozygous state in asexual populations. Calculation of the selective load incurred suggests that it may offset the intrinsic twofold reproductive advantage of asexual reproduction and maintain sexual reproduction in diploid populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams, G. C. Sex and Evolution (Princeton University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maynard Smith, J. The Evolution of Sex (Cambridge University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd edn (Dover, New York, 1958).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Muller, H. J. Am. Nat. 66, 118–138 (1932).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michod, R. E. & Levin, B. R. (eds) The Evolution of Sex: an Examination of Current Ideas (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1988).

  6. Kondrashov, A. S. Nature 336, 435–440 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bell, G. The Masterpiece of Nature (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirkpatrick, M., Jenkins, C. Genetic segregation and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature 339, 300–301 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/339300a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/339300a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing