  | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Journal Home | |
| Current Issue | |
| AOP | |
| Archive | |
| |
| |
THIS ARTICLE  | |
| |
| Download PDF | |
| References | |
| |
| |
| |
| Export citation | |
| Export references | |
| |
| |
| |
| Send to a friend | |
| |
| |
| |
| More articles like this | |
| |
| |
| |
| Table of Contents | |
| < Previous | Next > | |
| |
 |
 |
| Nature 337, 605 (16 February 1989); doi:10.1038/337605a0 |
|
Ambiguities in stereopsis
VANCE TUCKER
Department of Zoology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| 1. | Wheatstone, C. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 128, 371−394 (1838). |
| 2. | Judge, A.W. Stereoscopic Photograph (Am. Photographic, Boston, 1935). |
| 3. | Young, D.C. Science 235, 623 (1987). | PubMed | ChemPort | |
| 4. | Hamori, E., Broad, R.D. & Reed Jr. C.E. Perception 11, 297−304 (1982). | PubMed | ChemPort | |
© 1989 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy
