Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works
Nature
my account e-alerts subscribe register
SEARCH JOURNAL     advanced search
Journal Home
Current Issue
AOP
Archive
Download PDF
References
Export citation
Export references
Send to a friend
More articles like this

Letters to Nature
Nature 331, 163 - 166 (14 January 1988); doi:10.1038/331163a0

Perception of shape from shading

V. S. Ramachandran

UniversityofCalifornia,SanDiego,LaJolla,California92093,USA

The human visual system can rapidly and accurately derive the three-dimensional orientation of surfaces by using variations in image intensity alone1–5.This ability to perceive shape from shading is one of the most important yet poorly understood aspects of human vision. Here we present several findings which may help reveal computational mechanisms underlying this ability. First, we find that perception of shape from shading is a global operation which assumes that there is only one light source illuminating the entire visual image. This implies that if two identical objects are viewed simultaneously and illuminated from different angles, then we would be able to perceive three-dimensional shape accurately in only one of them at a time. Second, three-dimensional shapes that are defined exclusively by shading can provide tokens for the perception of apparent motion, suggesting that the motion mechanism is remarkably versatile in the kinds of inputs it can use. Lastly, the occluding edges which delineate an object from its background can also powerfully influence the perception of three-dimensional shape from shading.

------------------

References
1. Witkin, A. P. & Tenenbaum, J. M. in Human Machine Vision (eds Beck, J., Hope, B. & Rosenfeld, A.) 481−543 (Academic, New York, 1983).
2. Pentland, A. J. opt. Soc. Am. 72, 448−455 (1982).
3. Todd, J. & Mingolla, E. J. exp. Psychol. 9, 583−595 (1983). | ChemPort |
4. Horn, B. K. P. in The Psychology of Computer Vision (ed. McGraw Hill, New York, 1975).
5. Yonas, A., Kuskowski, M. & Sternfels, S. Child Dev. 50, 495−500 (1979). | PubMed | ChemPort |
6. Ramachandran, V. S. & Anstis, S. M. Scient. Am. 254, 102−109 (1986). | ISI | ChemPort |
7. Restle, F. in Organization and representation in perception (ed. Beck, J.) 31−36 (Lawrence Erlbaum, London, 1982).
8. Treisman, A. Scient. Am. 255, 114−126 (1986).
9. Julesz, B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception (Chicago University Press, 1971).
10. Beck, J. Percept. Psychophys. 1, 300−302 (1966).
11. Albright, T. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 13, 1626 (1987).
12. Ramachandran, V. S., Rao, V. M. & Vidyasagar, T. R. Vision Res. 13, 1399−1401 (1973). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
13. Gregory, R. L. Nature 238, 51−52 (1972). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
14. Kanizsa, G. Scient. Am. 234, 48−52 (1976). | ChemPort |
15. Ramachandran, V. S. Percept. Psychophys. 39, 361−373 (1986). | PubMed | ChemPort |
16. Ramachandran, V. S., Cobb, S. & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 13, 630 (1987).
17. Campbell, F. W. & Robson, J. G. J. Physiol., Lond. 197, 551−556 (1968). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |



© 1988 Nature Publishing Group
Privacy Policy