Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Signal requirements in the step-wise functional maturation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes

Abstract

The generation of effector cytotoxic T lymphocytes from resting precursors proceeds through a series of steps in a pathway that, in aggregate, involves both proliferation and development of cytotoxicity1–7. To understand the relationship of the various signals (mitogens and/or lymphokines) that bring about progress along this pathway, it is desirable to define a series of 'minimal signals', each of which stimulates the cell to proceed to a further stage in this process of differentiation. Stimulation of lymphocytes with two different monoclonal antibodies directed against the CD2 surface molecule induces a proliferative response8; we report here that both CD4+ and CD8+ cells proliferate in response to such a stimulus but do not develop cytotoxicity. Addition of recombinant γ-interferon (rIFN-γ) or recombinant IL-2 (rIL-2) to the activated cells leads to acquisition of cytotoxic status by the CD8+ cells but not the CD4+ cells. The availability, in addition to precursors and effectors, of an apparently intermediate stage in the form of proliferating CD8+ cells that are non-cytotoxic should facilitate both cellular and molecular studies of this maturation pathway; the differences between CD4+ and CD8+ cells in development of cytotoxicity under these experimental conditions is a valuable model for understanding differentiation of T lymphocytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lafferty, K. J. & Cunningham, A. J. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 53, 27–42 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bach, F. H., Bach, M. L. & Sondel, P. J. Nature 259, 273–281 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. MacDonald, H. R. & Lees, R. K. J. Immun. 124, 1308–1313 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Teh, H. S. & Teh, S. J. Nature 285, 163–165 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Raulet, O. H. & Bevan, M. J. Nature 296, 754–757 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner, H. et al. J. exp. Med. 155, 1876–1881 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanagawa, O. J. Immun. 131, 606–610 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meuer, C. S. et al. Cell 36, 897–906 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bretscher, P. & Cohn, M. Science 169, 1042–1049 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Melchers, F. & Andersson, J. Cell 37, 715–720 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Holter, W., Fischer, O., Majdic, O., Stockinger, H. & Knapp, W. J. exp. Med. 163, 654–664 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin, P. J. et al. J. Immun. 131, 180–185 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siliciano, R., Pratt, J. C., Schmidt, R. E., Ritz, J. & Reinherz, E. L. Nature 317, 428–430 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng, L. K. et al. Eur. J. Immun. 7, 767–770 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Orosz, C. G., Roopenian, D. C. & Bach, F. H. J. Immun. 130, 2499–2501 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schendel, D. J. & Bach, F. H. J. exp. Med. 140, 1534–1546 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lalande, M. E., McCutcheon, M. J. & Miller, R. G. J. exp. Med. 151, 12–19 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ochoa, A. C., Gromo, G., Wee, S. L. & Bach, F. H. in Specificity and Function of Clonally Developing T Cells (eds Fleischer, B., Reimann, J. & Wagner, H.) 155–164 (Springer, Berlin, 1986).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakagawa, T., Nakagawa, N., Volkman, D. J. & Fauci, A. S. J. Immun. 136, 164–168 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wysocki, L. J. & Sato, V. L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 2844–2848 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gromo, G., Geller, R. L., Inverardi, L., Wee, S.-L. & Bach, F. H. J. Immun. 138, 2155–2160 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gromo, G., Geller, R., Inverardi, L. et al. Signal requirements in the step-wise functional maturation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Nature 327, 424–426 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/327424a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/327424a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing