Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations may increase streamflow

Abstract

Historically, studies of the greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide (CO2) have dealt primarily with temperature and only secondarily with precipitation. In the latest report on this topic1, however, the subject of streamflow is broached with an analysis2 which suggests that watersheds in the western United States will suffer 40–75% reductions in streamflow for a doubling of the atmospheric CO2 content, leading to a 2 °C rise in air temperature and a 10% drop in precipitation. A shortcoming of that study is that it does not include the direct antitranspirant effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment that would accompany any CO2-induced climatic change, whereby increasing CO2 content of the air tends to induce partial stomatal closure, so reducing plant transpiration and thereby conserving soil moisture and increasing runoff to streams. Inclusion of this latter effect in a simple model of watershed runoff applied to 12 drainage basins in Arizona indicates that 40–60% increases in streamflow may well be the more likely consequences of a CO2 concentration doubling, even in the face of adverse changes in temperature and precipitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee, US National Research Council Changing Climate (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1983).

  2. Revelle, R. R. & Waggoner, P. E. in Changing Climate 419–432 (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Langbein, W. B. et al. Annual Runoff in the United States, U. S. Geol. Surv. Circ. No. 5 (US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, 1949).

  4. Brazel, A. J. & Idso, S. B. Implications of the Rapidly Rising CO2 Content of Earth's Atmosphere for Water Resources in Arizona (Climatol. Publ. Sci. Pap. No. 19, Laboratory of Climatology, Arizona State University, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brazel, A. J. et al. Final Report Arizona Climate Inventory Vol 1 (Laboratory of Climatology, Arizona State University, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. US Geological Survey Water Resources Data Arizona Water Year 1981 (Water-Data Report AZ-81-1 1983).

  7. Kimball, B. A. & Idso, S. B. Agric. Wat. Managmnt 7, 55–73 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers, H. H., Thomas, J. F. & Bingham, G. E. Science 220, 428–429 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, D. E. (ed.) Biotic Communities of the American Southwest—United States and Mexico, J. Desert Plants Vol. 4, No. 1-4 (Boyce Thompson Arboretum, 1982).

  10. Aston, A. R. J. Hydrol. 67, 273–280 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Idso, S. B. & Quinn, J. A. Vegetational redistribution in Arizona and New Mexico in Response to a Doubling of the Atmospheric CO2 Concentration (Climatol. Publ. Sci. Pap. No. 17, Laboratory of Climatology, Arizona State University, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Idso, S. B. Carbon Dioxide: Friend or Foe? An Inquiry into the Climatic and Agricultural Consequences of the Rapidly Rising CO2 Content of Earth's Atmosphere (IBR Press, Tempe, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Idso, S., Brazel, A. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations may increase streamflow. Nature 312, 51–53 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/312051a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/312051a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing