Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Magnetic flare model of γ-ray bursts

Abstract

The thermal synchrotron (TS) interpretation of γ-ray burst continuum spectra1 has recently gained support from the analysis of an expanding database2–5. However, this interpretation requires an emission region which is hot (kT0.2–1mc2), optically very thin (nh 1021 cm−2) with a highly super-Eddington flux F 1030 erg cm−2 s−1FEdd = 1025 M/M) for a 10-km neutron star. This picture is similar to that first proposed for the 5 March 1979 event6–8. In addition there are hints that the emission layer is very dense (ne 1024-1026 cm−3) and thin (h 10−3 cm). For example, events which show simultaneous redshifted 511-keV annihilation lines and low energy self-absorption (see Fig. 1) allow us to estimate a lower limit in the range 1023-1026 cm−1 (ref. 9) to the pair density, provided that the annihilation region coincides with the synchrotron source. To maintain the pair population close to maxwellian, the collision excitation rate into higher Landau levels9 (that is, the pitch-angle scattering rate) must exceed the cyclotron decay rates. Coulomb scattering between pairs and protons is too slow. Even if collective processes whose rates are close to the electron plasma frequency, or scattering by heavy ions (for example, Z = 26, rates Z2), are invoked, a particle density n 1025 cm−3 is still needed. Both arguments point towards a dense but thin emitting sheet with h 10−3–10−5 cm. The severe energetics and persistence of such a hot, dense, thin emitting layer prompted us to consider a picture in which the emission regions lie at the foot points of reconnecting magnetic loops, powered by downward impinging electromagnetic waves. We now examine the structure of the emitting sheet, and the generation, propagation and coupling of the electromagnetic energy fluxes to the surface layer, and show that a flare-like model can account for most of the general features of γ-ray bursts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liang, E. P., Jernigan, T. E. & Rodrigues, R. Astrophys. J. 271, 766–777 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mazets, E. P. et al. Astrophys. Space Sci. 80, 3–83 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barat, C. Proc. Santa Cruz Workshop on High Energy Transients (ed. Woosley, S.) (AIP, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Desai, U. D. et al. Proc. COSPAR Cosmic-Ray Symp., Bangalore (Publisher? 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nolan, P. L. Proc. Santa Cruz Workshop on High Energy Transients (ed. Woosley, S.) (AIP, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ramaty, R., Lingenfelter, R. & Bussard, R. W. Astrophys. Space Sci. 75, 193–203 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramaty, R. et al. Nature 287, 122–124 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Katz, J. I. Astrophys. J. 260, 370–385 (1982).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liang, E. P. AIP Conf. Proc. No. 101 (eds Burns, M., Harding, A. & Ramaty, R.) 81–88 (AIP, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duijveman, A., Hoyng, P. & Machado, M. E. Sol. Phys. 81, 137–157 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruderman, M. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 262, 164 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Katz, J. I. in AIP Conf. Proc. No. 101 (eds Burns, M. L., Harding, A. K. & Ramaty, R.) 65–75 (AIP, New York, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker, E. N. Astrophys. J. 264, 635–641 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Furth, H. P., Killeen, J. & Rosenbluth, M. N. Phys. Fluids 6, 459–484 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Priest, E. R. AGU Chapman Conf. on Reconnection, Los Alamos (American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Petschek, H. E. AAS–NASA Symp. on the Physics of Solar Flares, 425–430 (NASA Spec. Publ. SP-50, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barnes, A. & Suffolk, G. C. J. J. Plasma Phys. 5, 315–329 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Max, C. in Les Houghes Summer School, Proc. Laser-Plasma Interactions, (eds Balian, R. & Adam, J. C.) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barat, C. et al. Astr. Astrophys. 126, 400–402 (1983).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Woosley, S. in AIP Conf. Proc. No. 77 (ed. Lingenfelter, R.) 273–292 (AIP, New York, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, E., Antiochos, S. Magnetic flare model of γ-ray bursts. Nature 310, 121–122 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/310121a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/310121a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing