Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A field study of the fallibility of polygraphic lie detection

Abstract

With the increasing use of polygraphic lie detection in the United States and United Kingdom it has become a matter of urgency to assess the accuracy and reliability of the technique. The main purpose of the present report, therefore, is to extend our earlier mock theft lie detection study1 from the laboratory to the field. Again, as in the previous study, our findings show high false-positive and false-negative rates among polygraph interpreters. These data, with their unacceptably high error rates, agree with the conclusions reached in a recent US Congress Office of Technology Assessment report2 which reviewed the scientific validity of the polygraph. Hence, we conclude that the validity and reliability of polygraphic interrogation has yet to be established.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Szucko, J. J. & Kleinmuntz, B. Am. Psychol. 36 488–496 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scientific Validity of Polygraph Testing: A Research Review and Evaluation—A Technical Memorandum, OTA-TM-H-15 (Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of The United States, Washington DC, 1983).

  3. Ben-Shakhar, G., Lieblich, I. & Kugelmass, S. J. appl. Psychol. 54, 409–413 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidson, P. O. J. appl. Psychol. 52, 62–65 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lykken, D. T. J. appl. Psychol. 44, 258–262 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleinmuntz, B., Szucko, J. A field study of the fallibility of polygraphic lie detection. Nature 308, 449–450 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/308449a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/308449a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing