Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A single quantum cannot be cloned

Abstract

If a photon of definite polarization encounters an excited atom, there is typically some nonvanishing probability that the atom will emit a second photon by stimulated emission. Such a photon is guaranteed to have the same polarization as the original photon. But is it possible by this or any other process to amplify a quantum state, that is, to produce several copies of a quantum system (the polarized photon in the present case) each having the same state as the original? If it were, the amplifying process could be used to ascertain the exact state of a quantum system: in the case of a photon, one could determine its polarization by first producing a beam of identically polarized copies and then measuring the Stokes parameters1. We show here that the linearity of quantum mechanics forbids such replication and that this conclusion holds for all quantum systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Born, M. & Wolf, E. Principles of Optics 4th edn (Pergamon, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herbert, N. Found. Phys. (in the press).

  3. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bohm, D. Quantum Theory, 611–623 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kocher, C. A. & Commins, E. D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 575–578 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Freedman, S. J. & Clauser, J. R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938–941 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fry, E. S. & Thompson, R. C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 465–468 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aspect, A., Grangier, P. & Roger, G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460–463 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bussey, P. J. Phys. Lett. 90 A, 9–12 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haus, H. A. & Mullen, J. A. Phys. Rev. 128, 2407–2410 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Caves, C. M. Phys. Rev. D15, (in the press).

  12. Gozzini, A. Proc. Symp. on Wave–Particle Dualism (eds Diner, S., Fargue, D., Lochak, G. & Selleri, F) (Reidel, Dordrecht, in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wootters, W., Zurek, W. A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299, 802–803 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/299802a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/299802a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing