Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

In vivo decoding rules in Schizosaccharomyces pombe are at variance with in vitro data

Abstract

On the basis of in vitro experiments, conflicting hypotheses have been proposed for the assignment of tRNA isoacceptors to the reading of synonymous codons1,2. Here we present a genetic approach for studying the decoding capacity of serine isoacceptors in vivo. Cells of Schizosaccharomyces pombe have been depleted of tRNASerUCA by mutating the two genes known to code for this isoacceptor, sup3 and sup9, first to UGA nonsense suppressor alleles and then to suppressor inactive alleles carrying secondary lesions. The lethality resulting from the combination of inactive alleles at both loci indicates that tRNASerUCA is essential for growth. Disregarding the remote possibility that this tRNA has vital roles other than in protein synthesis, we conclude that its function in translating UCA cannot be taken over by any other serine tRNA, including the major inosine-containing isoacceptor. This is at variance with both the wobble rule for inosine proposed by Crick1 and the ‘two out of three’ reading scheme proposed by Lagerkvist2, and suggests that decoding rules deduced from in vitro data do not necessarily apply to the in vivo situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crick, F. H. C. J. molec. Biol. 19, 548–555 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lagerkvist, U. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 1759–1762 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Söll, D., Cherayil, J. D. & Bock, R. M. J. molec. Biol. 29, 97–112 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heckman, J. E., Sarnoff, J., Alzner-DeWeerd, B., Yin, S. & RajBhandary, U. L. Proc. natn Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 3159–3163 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonitz, S. G. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 3167–3170 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrell, B. G. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 3164–3166 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kilpatrick, M. W. & Walker, R. T. Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 2783–2786 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Agris, P. F., Söll, D. & Seno, T. Biochemistry 12, 4331–4336 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zachau, H. G., Dütting, D. & Feldmann, H. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. physiol. Chem. 347, 212–235 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ginsberg, T., Rogg, H. & Staehelin, M. Eur. J. Biochem. 21, 249–257 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Olson, M. V. et al. Nature 291, 464–469 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kohli, J., Mao, J. & Söll, D. in Genetics and Evolution of RNA Polymerase, tRNA and Ribosomes (eds Osawa, S. et al.) 233–250 (University of Tokyo Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rafalski, A., Kohli, J., Agris, P. & Söll, D. Nucleic Acids Res. 6, 2683–2695 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wetzel, R., Kohli, J., Altruda, F. & Söll, D. Molec. gen. Genet. 172, 221–228 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hofer F. et al. Curr. Genet. 1, 45–61 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Egel, R., Kohli, J., Thuriaux, P. & Wolf, K. A. Rev. Genet. 14, 77–108 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis, G. E., Gehrke, C. W., Kuo, K. C. & Agris, P. F. J. Chromat. 173, 281–298 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Piper, P. W. J. molec. Biol. 122, 217–235 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Etcheverry, T., Colby, D. & Guthrie, C. Cell 18, 11–26 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mao, J., Schmidt, O. & Söll, D. Cell 21, 509–516 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Murgola, E. J. & Pagel, F. T. J. molec. Biol. 138, 833–844 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts, J. W. & Carbon, J. J. biol. Chem. 250, 5530–5541 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weissenbach, J., Dirheimer, G., Falcoff, R., Sanceau, J. & Falcoff, E. FEBS lett. 82, 71–76 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldman, E., Holmes, W. M. & Hatfield, G. W. J. molec. Biol. 129, 567–585 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munz, P., Leupold, U., Agris, P. et al. In vivo decoding rules in Schizosaccharomyces pombe are at variance with in vitro data. Nature 294, 187–188 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/294187a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/294187a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing