Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Voice pitch as an aid to lipreading

Abstract

The totally deafened adult, unable to make use of a hearing aid, has no alternative to lipreading for everyday communication. Lipreading, however, is no substitute for hearing speech. Many lipreaders have great difficulty in ideal conditions and even the best lipreaders find the task demanding and tiring. Prosthetic attempts to substitute for lost hearing have centred on three distinct types of intervention, visual1,2, tactile3–6 and electrocochlear7–13. As none of these is likely to yield a good understanding of speech independent of lipreading in the near future, we have attempted to isolate relatively simple patterns of stimulation that, although not intelligible in themselves, will aid lipreading. From this point of view, the fundamental frequency or ‘pitch’ of the voice is the most important pattern element because it provides both segmental and suprasegmental information and is practically invisible. It thus complements the visual information already available on the face. As we show here, with the voice pitch presented acoustically, normal listeners can lipread a speaker reading a continuous text at up to two and a half times the rate possible on the basis of lipreading alone. The pitch signal by itself, of course, is completely unintelligible. Although our work is primarily concerned with methods of electrical stimulation of the cochlea10, it has implications for other sensory substitution techniques, the design of special purpose hearing aids and current theories of speech perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Upton, H. W. Am. Ann. Deaf 113, 222–229 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martony, J. et al. in Speech Communication Seminar Vol. 4, 93–96 (Almqvist-Wiksell, Uppsala, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Filippo, C. L. & Scott, B. L. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 1186–1192 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kirman, J. H. Psychol. Bull. 80, 54–74 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rothenberg, M. & Molitor, R. D. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 1029–1038 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sparks, D. W., Ardell, L. A., Bourgeois, M., Wiedmer, B. & Kuhl, P. K. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 65, 810–815 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chouard, C. H. & MacLeod, P. Laryngoscope 86, 1743–1751 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, G. M. et al. J. Lar. Otol. 91, 935–946 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eddington, D. K., Dobelle, W. H., Brackmann, D. E., Mladejovsky, M. G. & Parkin, J. L. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 87, Suppl. 53, 1–39 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fourcin, A. J. et al. Br. J. Audiol. 13, 85–107 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. House, W. F. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 85, Suppl. 27, 1–93 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Merzenich, M. M., Michelson, R. P., Schindler, R. A., Petit, C. R. & Reid, M. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 82, 486–503 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Simmons, F. B. Archs Otolar. 84, 22–76 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeffers, J. & Barley, M. Speechreading (Lipreading) (Thomas, Illinois, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fourcin, A. J. in The Development of Communication (eds Waterson, N. & Snow, C.) 47–72 (Wiley, Chichester, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fourcin, A. J. & Abberton, E. Med. biol. Illust. 21, 172–182 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gold, A. A. & Rabiner, L. R. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 46, 442–448 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Spens, K.-E. Q. Prog. Status Rep., 2–3 (Speech Transmission Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 1975).

  19. Stratton, W. D. Volta Rev. 76, 26–35 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fourcin, A. J. in Language, Cognitive Deficits and Retardation (ed. O'Connor, N.) 33–46 (Butterworth, London, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bilger, R. C. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 86, Suppl. 38, 1–176 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosen, S., Fourcin, A. & Moore, B. Voice pitch as an aid to lipreading. Nature 291, 150–152 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/291150a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/291150a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing