Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Problems in interpreting tree-ring δ 13C records

Abstract

THE stable carbon isotopic (13C/12C) record of twentieth-century tree rings has been examined1–3 for evidence of the effects of the input of isotopically lighter fossil fuel CO2 (δ 13C−25‰ relative to the primary PDB standard4), since the onset of major fossil fuel combustion during the mid-nineteenth century, on the 13C/12C ratio of atmospheric CO2(δ 13C−7‰), which is assimilated by trees by photosynthesis. The decline in δ13C up to 1930 observed in several series of tree-ring measurements has exceeded that anticipated from the input of fossil fuel CO2 to the atmosphere, leading to suggestions of an additional input ‰) during the late nineteenth/early twentieth century. Stuiver3 has suggested that a lowering of atmospheric δ 13C of 0.7‰, from 1860 to 1930 over and above that due to fossil fuel CO2 can be attributed to a net biospheric CO2 (δ 13C−25‰) release comparable, in fact, to the total fossil fuel CO2 flux from 1850 to 1970. If information about the role of the biosphere as a source of or a sink for CO2 in the recent past can be derived from tree-ring 13C/12C data it could prove useful in evaluating the response of the whole dynamic carbon cycle to increasing input of fossil fuel CO2 and thus in predicting potential climatic change through the greenhouse effect of resultant atmospheric CO2 concentrations. I report here the trend (Fig. 1a) in whole wood δ 13C from 1883 to 1968 for tree rings of an American elm, grown in a non-forest environment at sea level in Falmouth, Cape Cod, Massachusetts (41°34′N, 70°38′W) on the northeastern coast of the US. Examination of the δ 13C trends in the light of various potential influences demonstrates the difficulty of attributing fluctuations in 13C/12C ratios to a unique cause and suggests that comparison of pre-1850 ratios with temperature records could aid resolution of perturbatory parameters in the twentieth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farmer, J. G. & Baxter, M. S. Nature 247, 273–275 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Freyer, H. D. & Wiesberg, L. Nature 252, 757 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stuiver, M. Science 199, 253–258 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Craig, H. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 3, 53–92 (1953); 12, 133–149 (1957).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oeschger, H., Siegenthaler, U., Schotterer, A. & Gugelmann, A. Tellus 27, 168–192 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson, A. T. Nature 273, 40–41 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pearman, G. J., Francey, R. J. & Fraser, P. J. B. Nature 260, 771–773 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Woodwell, G. M. et al. Science 199, 141–146 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grinsted, M. J., Wilson, A. T. & Ferguson, C. W. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 42, 251–253 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson, A. T. & Grinsted, M. J. Nature 265, 133–135 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Manley, G. Q. Jl R. meteor. Soc. 100, 389–405 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FARMER, J. Problems in interpreting tree-ring δ 13C records. Nature 279, 229–231 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/279229a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/279229a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing