Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Reduction of visibility by sulphates in photochemical smog

Abstract

THE relationship between pollutant emissions and the optical haze characteristic of photochemical smog has proved difficult to unravel1,2. It is clear that material produced by reaction in the atmosphere is responsible for much of the deterioration in the optical environment, since the ambient aerosol scatters much more light at a given mass concentration than do the primary aerosols emitted by known sources3,4. Unfortunately, measurement of the scattering contributed by an individual product species is complicated by the fact that most of this secondary material is deposited on existing particles and cannot be isolated for direct observation of its in situ optical properties. In this note I present statistical evidence from measurements in Los Angeles that secondary sulphate compounds scatter visible light more efficiently than do other chemical fractions of the ambient aerosol. My results indicate that sulphur emissions can strongly influence atmospheric visibility even in photochemical smog of the Los Angeles variety, where secondary organics and nitrates contribute most of the pollutant aerosol mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomas, M. D., Int. J. Air Water Pollution, 6, 443 (1962).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keith, R. W., Air Quality Report No. 65 (Los Angeles Air Pollution Control District, 1970).

  3. Charlson, R. J., et al., J. Air Pollution Control Ass., 19, 937 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elder, J. C., Ettinger, H. J., and Nelson, R. Y., Atmos. Envir., 8, 1035 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Husar, R. B., White, W. H., and Blumenthal, D. L., Envir. Sci. Tech., 10, 490 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Horvath, H., and Noll, K. E., Atmos. Envir., 3, 543 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hidy, G. M., et al., Characterization of Aerosols in California, Final Report (California Air Resources Board, 1974).

  8. Garland, J. A., Atmos. Envir., 3, 347 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Covert, D. S., Charlson, R. J., and Ahlquist, N. C., J. appl. Met., 11, 968 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. White, W. H., and Roberts, P. T., Paper No. 75-28.6 (Air Pollution Control Association Annual Meeting, 1975).

  11. Waggoner, A. P., et al., Nature, 261, 120 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedlander, S. K., J. Met., 17, 373 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WHITE, W. Reduction of visibility by sulphates in photochemical smog. Nature 264, 735–736 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/264735a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/264735a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing