Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Cytoplasmic exclusion as a basis for asymmetric nucleocytoplasmic solute distributions

Abstract

THE nuclear and cytoplasmic concentrations of solutes in cells are often unequal. This has been observed for ions1,2, small molecules3–5, and for macromolecules6–10. The role of maintaining these concentration differentials is commonly assigned to the nuclear envelope, but this practice is predicated on a questionable analogy with the plasma membrane. Most of the information derived from tracer kinetics4,8,9 and electrical resistance10–13 indicates that the nuclear envelope is too permeable to distinguish or differentially transport small solutes. Thus, we must look to other, presumably equilibrium, mechanisms to account for many nucleocytoplasmic solute asymmetries. One useful step in the analysis of solute distributions between two phases is to establish a reference phase to which the concentrations of substances in the other two phases can be compared. A suitable reference phase for cytoplasm and nucleus cannot, of course, be separated from them by the cell membrane, which itself has complex, asymmetric transport properties. Thus, the reference phase must be intracellular. We have carried out experiments in which a defined aqueous reference phase (a gelatin gel) was introduced into the cytoplasm, and the partition of solutes between this phase, cytoplasm, and nucleus was determined. We deal here with the intracellular distribution of 3H-sucrose—a small, non-metabolised substance which reaches a greater concentration in the nucleus than in the cytoplasm4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Century, T. J., Fenichel, I. R., and Horowitz, S. B., J. Cell Sci., 7, 5–13 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Century, T. J., and Horowitz, S. B., J. Cell Sci., 16, 465–471 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Horowitz, S. B., and Fenichel, I. R., J. gen. Physiol., 51, 703–730 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Horowitz, S. B., J. Cell Biol., 54, 609–625 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Frank, M., and Horowitz, S. B., J. Cell Sci., 19, 127–139 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paine, P. L., and Feldherr, C. M., Expl Cell Res., 74, 81–98 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gurdon, J. B., Proc. R. Soc., B 176, 303–314 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Horowitz, S. B., and Moore, L. C., J. Cell Biol., 60, 405–415 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Paine, P. L., Moore, L. C., and Horowitz, S. B., Nature, 254, 109–114 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Paine, P. L., J. Cell Biol., 66, 652–657 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ito, S., and Loewenstein, W. R., Science, 150, 909–910 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Loewenstein, W. R., and Kanno, Y., J. gen. Physiol., 46, 1123–1140 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Loewenstein, W. R., Protoplasmatologia, 2, 26–34 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Horowitz, S. B., in Methods in Cell Biology, 8 (edit. by Prescott, D. M.) (Academic, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bonner, W. M., J. Cell Biol., 64, 421–430 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Feldherr, C. M., Expl Cell Res., 93, 411–419 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Legname, C., and Goldstein, L., Expl Cell Res., 75, 111–121 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Feldherr, C. M., J. Cell Biol., 14, 65 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Feldherr, C. M., J. Cell Biol., 39, 49–54 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McFarlane, A. S., MacFarlane, M. B., Amies, C. P., and Eagles, G. H., Br. J. exp. Path., 20, 485–501 (1939).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ogston, A. G., and Phelps, C. F., Biochem. J., 78, 827–833 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogers, A. W., J. Microsc., 96, 141–153 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HOROWITZ, S., PAINE, P. Cytoplasmic exclusion as a basis for asymmetric nucleocytoplasmic solute distributions. Nature 260, 151–153 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/260151a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/260151a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing