Nature 258, 70 - 73 (06 November 1975); doi:10.1038/258070a0

Fate of teratocarcinoma cells injected into early mouse embryos

V. E. PAPAIOANNOU^*, M. W. MCBURNEY^*, R. L. GARDNER^* & M. J. EVANS^†

^*Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK
^†Department of Anatomy and Embryology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC2, UK

ANALYSIS of early mammalian development is complicated by technical difficulties. The initial processes of cellular determination and differentiation in the mouse embryo take place in small populations of cells^1,2, and major embryogenic events occur after uterine implantation when the embryo is largely inaccessible. Recent work, however, suggests that murine teratocarcinomas may provide a convenient model for studying mammalian development³⁻⁶. These are transplantable tumours of germ cell or embryonic cell origin³⁻⁶, typically consisting of a variety of differentiated tissues and undifferentiated stem cells. The stem cells, called embryonal carcinoma, resemble cells of early embryos in morphological, biochemical and cell surface properties, and in developmental potential³⁻⁶. They can be propagated in tissue culture to provide sufficient material for biochemical analysis. After inoculation into histocompatible adult hosts they form differentiated teratocarcinomas. They also differentiate in vitro ^7,8 where the first stages of their differentiation seem to parallel normal embryonic development. We show here that embryonal carcinoma cells can participate in normal embryogenesis, thus providing further evidence for the validity of the use of these cultures as a model of normal embryonic development.

References

1.	Gardner, R. L., and Papaioannou, V. E., in The Early Development of Mammals (edit. by Balls, M., and Wild, A. E.), 107 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975).
2.	Gardner, R. L., and Rossant, J., in Embryogenesis in Mammals, CIBA Foundation Symposium (edit. by O'Conner, M.), (Elsevier, Amsterdam, in the press).
3.	Martin, G. R., Cell, 5, 229 (1975).
4.	Damjanov, I., and Solter, D., Curr. Top. Path., 59, 69 (1974).
5.	Stevens, L. C., Adv. Morphogen., 6, 1 (1967).
6.	Pierce, G. B., Curr. Top. dev. Biol., 2, 223 (1967).
7.	Martin, G. R., and Evans, M. J., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 72, 1441 (1975).
8.	Nicolas, J. F., Dubois, P., Jakob, H., Guillard, J., and Jacob, F., Ann. Microbiol., 126A, 3 (1975).
9.	Gardner, R. L., Nature, 220, 596 (1968); Gardner, R. L., Adv. Biosci., 6, 279 (1971).
10.	Gardner, R. L., and Lyon, M., Nature, 231, 385 (1971).
11.	Ford, C. E., Evans, E. P., and Gardner, R. L., J. Embryol. exp. Morph., 33, 447 (1975).
12.	Brinster, R. L., J. exp. Med., 140, 1049 (1974).
13.	Staats, J., Cancer Res., 32, 1609 (1972).
14.	Gardner, R. L., J. Embryol. exp. Morph., 28, 279 (1972).
15.	Chapman, V. M., Whitten, W. K., and Ruddle, F. H., Devl Biol., 26, 153 (1971).
16.	Wolfe, H. G., and Coleman, D. L., in Biology of the Laboratory Mouse (edit. by Green, E. L.), (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).
17.	Stevens, L. C., Devl Biol., 21, 364 (1970).
18.	Solter, D., Skreb, N., and Damjanov, I., Nature, 227, 503 (1970).
19.	Stevens, L. C., J. Embryol. exp. Morph., 20, 329 (1968).
20.	Evans, M. J., J. Embryol. exp. Morph., 28, 163 (1972).
21.	Mintz, B., and Illmensee, K., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (in the press).