Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Intimate Nature of Muscular Contraction

Abstract

IT was originally proposed by Astbury1 that muscular contraction was due to coiling or folding of the contractile proteins. A model of the structure of muscle sarcomere was recently proposed by A. F. Huxley and Neidergerke2 and by H. E. Huxley and Hanson3; their model shows that filaments of action and myosin slide past each other during contraction. A. F. Huxley4 proposed a hypothesis of contraction in which it is assumed that active shortening or the development of tension is brought about by generation of relative translational forces between actin and myosin filaments at a series of points in the region of overlap.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Astbury, W. T., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 134, 303 (1947).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huxley, A. F., and Neidergerke, R., Nature, 173, 971 (1954).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huxley, H. E., and Hanson, J., Nature, 173, 973 (1954).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huxley, A. F., Prog. Biophys., 7, 257 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh, I., and Acharya, A. K., Ind. J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 2, 262 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Singh, S. I., and Singh, I., Curr. Sci., 23, 126 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Singh, S. I., and Singh, I., Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 40, 125 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singh, S. I., and Singh, I., Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 40, 145 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh, S. I., and Singh, I., Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 42, 85 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bozler, E., Amer. J. Physiol., 167, 276 (1951).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huxley, H. E., and Hanson, J., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 81, 403 (1959).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SINGH, I. Intimate Nature of Muscular Contraction. Nature 196, 172–173 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/196172a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/196172a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing