Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Born Approximation in Electron Diffraction

Abstract

THE Born approximation for the electron wave scattered by an atom has been universally employed for the interpretation of electron diffraction experiments directed toward the determination of molecular or crystal structure. There is some justification for this. Quantitative measurements of diffraction intensities performed to test the applicability of the approximation for electrons of the energies usually used in structure work have, on the whole, been regarded as satisfactory verifications. In structure work itself—in the work on gas molecules, for example—the considerable success resulting from it use has led to the feeling that even in the presence of heavy atoms there might not be serious error. There has perhaps been the implicit faith that whatever theoretical refinements were lacking would at least not alter substantially the structures to be derived. We have found, however, that there is a phase shift on scattering, not given by the first Born approximation (this is the familiar Born approximation, the first term of a power-series expansion in the parameter α = − Ze2/hv), which is approximately proportional to atomic number, depends on angle of scattering, and may become large and important. The suggestion of the existence of this phase shift arose from the cases of uranium hexafluoride (UF6) and some other gas molecules.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braune, H., and Pinnow, P., Z. phys. Chem., B, 35, 239 (1937). Bauer, S. H., J. Chem. Phys., 18, 27 (1950). The observations have been checked in these laboratories by Dr. O. Bastiansen.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See especially Bigeleisen, J., Mayer, M. G., Stevenson, P. C., and Turkevich, J., J. Chem. Phys., 16, 442 (1948) and Burke, T. G., Smith, D. F., and Nielsen, A. H., J. Chem. Phys., 20, 447 (1952).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Germer, L. H., Phys. Rev., 56, 58 (1939).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yearian, H. J., Phys. Rev., 48, 631 (1935).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Acta Cryst., 3, 314 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Acta Cryst., 3, 479 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SCHOMAKER, V., GLAUBER, R. The Born Approximation in Electron Diffraction. Nature 170, 290–291 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1038/170290b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/170290b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing