Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Difference in Odour of d-, l- and dl-Derivatives of Amino- and Bisamino-Methylenecamphors

Abstract

IT is well known that optically active isomers, despite the fact that they are identical in structure, differ from one another in those physical properties which are of the directional (vectorial) nature, such as, for example, direction of rotation of the plane of polarized light, unsymmetrical distribution of the hemihedral facets in their crystal forms, etc. The magnitude of these vectorial properties is, however, identical for the enantiomorphous forms. The optically active forms differ also in other respects, namely, in their action on micro-organisms, enzymes and in their physiological behaviour towards higher organisms. In 1886 Piutti1 observed that d-asparagine had a sweet taste, whereas the naturally occurring l-asparagine was insipid. Cushny2 found that l-hyoscyamine was twice as powerful in paralysing the vagus as the racemic form, atropine, while the d-form was twenty times weaker in this action. One of the most striking examples of different physiological activity recently observed is vitamin C or ascorbic acid3: the dextro-rotatory acid is active, the dextro-rotatory form being physiologically inactive.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piutti, C.R. Soc. biol., 103, 137 (1886).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cushny, â'œBiological Relations of Optically Isomcric Substances,â’ 30 (London: Bailli&Ãre, Tindall and Cox, 1926).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Demole, Biochem. J., 28, 770 (1934).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Braun, Ber., 56 (B), 2268 (1923); Ber., 58, 2210 (1925); Ber., 60 (B), 2438 (1927).

  5. Pasteur, C.R. Acad. Sci., 103, 138 (1886).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Porter and Ihrig, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 45, 1990 (1923).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. King, J. Chem. Soc., 125, 46 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SINGH, B., LAL, A. Difference in Odour of d-, l- and dl-Derivatives of Amino- and Bisamino-Methylenecamphors. Nature 144, 910–911 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1038/144910b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/144910b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing