Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
The scientific community cannot complain that some of its members live in states whose laws are illiberal, but should it acquiesce in the arbitrary loss of jobs?
The new Presidential Science Advisor last week gave the House of Representatives a vision of how smaller budgets may bring strength. He was partly disingenuous; may he also be right?
The House of Lords committee on science and technology has produced a guileful recipe for change. Will the British government listen to what it has to say?
Creation-science goes on trial next week in Arkansas. The issue is whether recent legislation establishes religion. It would be better that it should have been the freedom of teachers to say what they believe.
Does the United States know what it is saying on nuclear strategy? Does it appreciate the consequences in Europe? Will it properly represent European interests at the arms control talks beginning 30 November?
Researchers threatened by the budgetary process in the United States are preaching the virtues of basic research. But even Dr Frank Press's argument will not wash. What should be done?