Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Predicting proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancies with urinary protein-creatinine or calcium-creatinine ratio

Abstract

Objective:

Evaluate the value of random urinary protein-creatinine (PrCr) and calcium-creatinine (CaCr) ratios to predict 24-h proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancies.

Study Design:

Spot urine samples were collected before routine 24-h urine collections from consecutive pregnant women with hypertension (n=83). Reliability of spot urinary PrCr and CaCr to detect significant proteinuria (300 mg/day) using 24-h urine protein as ‘gold-standard’ was assessed by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results:

Fifty-one patients (61.4%) had significant proteinuria (45 pre-eclampsia, 5 superimposed pre-eclampsia, 1 renal hypertension). Area under ROC curve to predict proteinuria was 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 0.92, P<0.001) for PrCr and 0.55 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.68, P=0.2) for CaCr. A cutoff value of >0.19 for PrCr best predicted significant proteinuria with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios (positive and negative), respectively, of 80.4, 68.8, 80.4, 68.8%, 2.57 and 3.51.

Conclusion:

Spot urinary PrCr predicts total urinary protein excretion in hypertensive pregnancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Waugh JJ, Clark TJ, Divakaran TG, Khan KS, Kilby MD . Accuracy of urinalysis dipstick techniques in predicting significant proteinuria in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 769–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adelberg AM, Miller J, Doerzbacher M, Lambers DS . Correlation of quantitative protein measurements in 8-, 12-, and 24-h urine samples for the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 804–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Neithardt AB, Dooley SL, Borensztajn J . Prediction of 24-h protein excretion in pregnancy with a single voided urine protein-to-creatinine ratio. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 883–886.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. ACOG technical bulletin. Hypertension in pregnancy, Number 219, January 1996 (replaces no. 91, February 1986): Committee on Technical Bulletins of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996; 53: 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramos JGL, Martins-Costa SH, Mathias MM, Guerin YLS, Barros EG . Urinary protein/creatinine ratio in hypertensive pregnant women. Hypertens Pregnancy 1999; 18: 209–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamasmit W, Chaithongwongwatthana S, Charoenvidhya D, Uerpairojkit B, Tolosa J . Random urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio for prediction of significant proteinuria in women with preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004; 16: 275–279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Saudan PJ, Brown MA, Farrell T, Shaw L . Improved methods of assessing proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1159–1164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Waugh JJ, Bell SC, Kilby MD, Blackwell CN, Seed P, Shennan AH et al. Optimal bedside urinalysis for the detection of proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancy: a study of diagnostic accuracy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 112: 412–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Al RA, Baykal C, Karacay O, Geyik PO, Altun S, Dolen I . Random urine protein-creatinine ratio to predict proteinuria in new-onset mild hypertension in late pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 367–371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Franceschini N, Savitz DA, Kaufman JS, Thorp JM . Maternal urine albumin excretion and pregnancy outcome. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 45: 1010–1018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodriguez-Thompson D, Libermann ES . Use of a random urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio for the diagnosis of significant proteinuria during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 808–811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Comper WD, Osicka TM . Detection of urinary albumin. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2005; 12: 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Durnwald C, Mercer B . A prospective comparison of total protein/creatinine ratio versus 24-h urine protein in women suspected with preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 847–852.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Young RA, Buchanan RJ, Kinch RA . Use of protein/creatinine ratio of single voided urine specimen in the evaluation of suspected pregnancy-induced hypertension. J Fam Pract 1996; 42: 385–389.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Quadri K, Bernardini BS, Greenberg A, Laifer S, Syed A, Holley JL . Assessment of renal function during pregnancy using a random protein to creatinine ratio and Cockcroft–Gault formula. Am J kidney Dis 1994; 24: 416–420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Robert M, Sepandj F, Liston R, Dooley K . Random protein-creatinine ratio for the quantification of proteinuria in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 893–895.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Price CP, Newall RG, Boyd JC . Use of protein: creatinine ratio measurements on random urine samples for prediction of significant proteinuria: A systematic review. Clinical Chemistry 2005; 51: 1577–1586.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Evans W, Lensmeyer JP, Kirby RS, Malony ME, Broekhuizen FF . Two-hour urine collection for evaluating renal function correlates with 24-h urine collection in pregnant patients. J Matern Fetal Med 2000; 9: 233–237.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kazerooni T, Hamze-Nejadi S . Calcium to creatinine ratio in a spot sample of urine for early prediction of preeclampsia. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2003; 80: 279–283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Baker PN, Kackett GA . The use of urinary albumin-creatinine ratios and calcium-creatinine ratios as screening tests for pregnancy induced hypertension. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 745–749.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Valerio EG, Ramos JG, Martins-Costa SH, Muller AL . Variation in the urinary protein/creatinine ratio at four different periods of the day in hypertensive pregnant women. Hypertens Pregnancy 2005; 24: 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsujikawa H, Machii R, Hiratsuka N, Shiba K, Fukuta H, Sakamoto H et al. Evaluation of novel test strip to measure albumin and creatinine in urine. Jpn J Clin Pathol 2005; 53: 111–117.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rizk DEE, Nasser M, Thomas L, Ezimokhai M . Women's perceptions and experiences of childbirth in United Arab Emirates. J Perinat Med 2001; 29: 298–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG . Statistical Methods. 8th edn. Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1989; 102–105.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gaspari F, Perico N, Remuzzi G . Timed urine collections are not needed to measure urine protein excretion in clinical practice. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 47: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haas DM, Sabi F, McNamara M, Rivera-Alsina M . Comparing ambulatory spot urine protein/creatinine ratios and 24-h urine protein measurements in normal pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 14: 233–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D E E Rizk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rizk, D., Agarwal, M., Pathan, J. et al. Predicting proteinuria in hypertensive pregnancies with urinary protein-creatinine or calcium-creatinine ratio. J Perinatol 27, 272–277 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211689

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211689

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links