Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Monochorionic monoamniotic twins: neonatal outcome

Journal of Perinatology volume 26, pages 170–175 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Background:

Monochorionic monoamniotic twins (MoMo) occur in one of 10 000 pregnancies. Cord entanglement, malformations, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTS) and prematurity are responsible for their high perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Objective:

To report our experience with 36 sets of MoMo twins (1990 to 2005) and to provide updated information for counseling.

Methods:

Chorionicity was determined by placental examination, gestational age and TTS clinically and by sonography. Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) was diagnosed with a twin-specific nomogram.

Results:

Cord entanglement was observed in 15 pregnancies, but only one twin with entanglement and a true knot, experienced related morbidity. Four of 71 live births were IUGR. Malformations were diagnosed prenatally (one hypoplastic left heart and one body stalk) and postnatally (one vertebral anomalies-anal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula-renal defect (VATER) and two lung hypoplasias). Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome affected three sets of twins. Five twin sets delivered before 31, 19 sets at 31 to 32 and 12 sets at 33 to 34 weeks. Six of 71 (8%) twins died (four malformations, one TTS and one 26 weeks premature). Head ultrasounds in 59 of 65 survivors showed two (3%) periventricular leukomalacia, five (9%) Grade I–II intraventricular hemorrhage and 52 (88%) normal.

Conclusions:

Monochorionic monoamniotic twins remain a group at risk for cord entanglement, congenital malformations, TTS and prematurity. Although their neonatal mortality and morbidity is high, outcomes for survival are better than anticipated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson M . Birth: final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003; 52: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Powers WF, Kiely JL . The risks confronting twins: a national perspective. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 456–461.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benirschke K . The biology of the twinning process: how placentation influences outcome. Semin Perinatol 1995; 19: 342–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carr SR, Aronson MP, Coustan DR . Survival rates of monoamniotic twins do not decrease after 30 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 719–722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tessen JA, Zlatnik FJ . Monoamniotic twins: a retrospective controlled study. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 832–834.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Victoria A, Mora G, Arias F . Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 310–315.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dube J, Dodds L, Armson BA . Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 579–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Umur A, Van Gemert M, Nikkels P . Monoamniotic-versus diamniotic-monochorionic twin placentas: anastomoses and twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 1325–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gallot D, Saulnier JR, Savary D, Laurichesse-Delmas H, Lemery D . Ultrasonographic signs of twin-twin transfusion syndrome in a monoamniotic twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 307–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Quintero RA, Morales WJ, Allen MH, Bornick PW, Johnson PK, Kruger M . Staging of twin–twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol 1999; 19: 550–555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Harman CR . Assessment of fetal health. In: Creasy RK, Resnik R, Iams JD (eds). Maternal–Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice. Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, 2004, pp 357–401.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ananth CV, Vintzileo AM, Shen-Schwarz S, Smulian JC, Lai YL . Standards of birth weight in twin gestations stratified by placental chorionicity. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 917–924.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H . Incidence and evolution of the subependymal intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with weights less than 1500 g. J Pediatr 1978; 92: 529–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baldwin V . The pathology of monochorionic monozygosity. In: Baldwin V (ed). Pathology of Multiple Pregnancy. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1994, pp 199–213.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Bilardo CM, Arabin B . Monoamniotic twins. In: Blickstein I, Keith LG (eds). Multiple Pregnancy. Taylor & Francis: London and New York, 2005, pp 574–582.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodis JF, McIlveen PF, Eagen JF, Borgida AF, Turner GW, Campbell WA . Monoamniotic twins: improved perinatal survival with accurate prenatal diagnosis and antenatal fetal surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1046–1049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Allen VM, Windrim R, Barrett J, Ohlsson A . Management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies: a case series and systematic review of the literature. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 108: 931–936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roque H, Gillen-Goldstein J, Funai E, Young BK, Lockwood CJ . Perinatal outcomes in monoamniotic gestations. J Matern-Fetal Neonat Med 2003; 13: 414–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ezra Y, Shveiky D, Ophir E, Nadjari M, Eisenberg VH, Samueloff A et al. Intensive management and early delivery reduce antenatal mortality in monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 432–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bajoria R . Vascular anatomy of monochorionic placenta in relation to discordant growth and amniotic fluid volume. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 2933–2940.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Demaria F, Goffinet F, Kayem G, Tsatsaris V, Hessabi M, Cabrol D . Monoamniotic twin pregnancies: Antenatal management and perinatal results of 19 consecutive cases. Int J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 111: 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suzuki S, Kaneko K, Shin S, Araki T . Incidence of intrauterine complications in monoamniotic twin gestation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2001; 265: 57–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ananth CV, Smulian JC . Trends in congenital malformations, chromosomal anomalies and infant mortality among twin birth. In: Blickstein I, Keith LG (eds). Multiple Pregnancy. Taylor & Francis: London and New York, 2005, pp 246–251.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Mastroiacovo P, Castilla EE, Arpino C, Botting B, Cocchi G, Goujard J et al. Congenital malformations in twins: an international study. Am J Med Genet 1999; 83: 117–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smrcek JM, Germer U, Krokowski M, Berg C, Krapp M, Geipel A et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and management of body stalk anomaly: analysis of 9 singleton and 2 multiple pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 322–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sebire NJ, Souka A, Skentou H, Geerts L, Nicolaides KH . First trimester diagnosis of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 223–225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McIntire D, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ . birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1234–1238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics and Obstetrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    L Cordero

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    A Franco & S D Joy

Authors
  1. L Cordero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A Franco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S D Joy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L Cordero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cordero, L., Franco, A. & Joy, S. Monochorionic monoamniotic twins: neonatal outcome. J Perinatol 26, 170–175 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211457

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211457

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links