Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare 8 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg loading doses of aminophylline.
STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-one preterm infants weighing <1500 g were enrolled once a decision to administer intravenous aminophylline was made. A standard maintenance dose was used. Serum levels of theophylline were drawn 8 hours after the loading dose and before the fifth maintenance dose.
RESULTS: After the initial loading dose, the 8 mg/kg group achieved recommended serum theophylline levels (7–12 μg/ml) more frequently than the 6mg/kg group (39% vs 3%, p=0.002). Subsequent levels were similar between the groups. There were no increases in side effects with the higher loading dose.
CONCLUSION: If a clinical decision to start intravenous aminophylline therapy in preterm infants has been made, the use of an 8 mg/kg loading dose appears to be a better and safe way to quickly achieve serum theophylline levels within the recommended range.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Henderson-Smart DJ, Steer P . Methylxanthine treatment for apnea in preterm infants Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000 2: CD000140
Shannon DC, Gotay F, Stein IM, Rogers MC, Todres ID, Moylan FMB . Prevention of apnea and bradycardia in low-birthweight infants Pediatrics 1975 55: 589–94
Aranda JV, Turmen T . Methylxanthines in apnea of prematurity Clin Perinatol 1979 6: 1 87–108
Muttitt SC, Tierney AJ, Finer NN . The dose response of theophylline in the treatment of apnea of prematurity J Pediatr 1988 112: 115–21
Siberry GK, Iannone R . The Harriet Lane Handbook St. Louis: Mosby 2000 p 625–6
Young TE, Mangum B . Neofax Raleigh: Acorn Publishing 2001 p 160–1
Bhatt DR, Reber DJ, Wirtschafter DD, Parikh AN, Thomas JC . Neonatal Drug Formulary Los Angeles: Neonatal Drug Formulary 1997 p 20–2
Taketomo CK, Hodding JH, Kraus DM . Pediatric Dosage Handbook Hudson: Lexi-Comp 2000–2001 p 61–3
Gal P, Gilman JT . Concerns about the food and drug administration guidelines for neonatal theophylline dosing Ther Drug Monit 1986 8: 1 1–3
Maxwell-Rubin M, Paap CM, Godley PJ . Adequacy of recommended aminophylline loading doses in children Am J Hosp Pharm 1994 51: 1667–71
Schmidt B . Methylxanthine therapy in premature infants: sound practice, disaster, or fruitless byway? J Pediatr 1999 135: 526–8
Chaudhuri M, Garg SK, Narang A, Bhakoo ON . Kinetics of theophylline in apnea of prematurity in small for gestational age babies Indian Pediatr 1996 33: 181–7
Jones RAK, Baillie E . Dosage schedule for intravenous aminophylline in apnoea of prematurity, based on pharmacokinetic studies Arch Dis Child 1979 54: 190–3
Aranda JV, Sitar DS, Parsons WD, Loughnan PM, Neims AH . Pharmacokinetic aspects of theophylline in premature newborns N Engl J Med 1976 295: 413–6
Giacoia G, Jusko WJ, Menke J, Koup JR . Theophylline pharmacokinetics in premature infants with apnea J Pediatr 1976 89: 5 829–32
Lagercrantz H, Rane A, Tunell R . Plasma concentration–effect relationship of theophylline in treatment of apnea in preterm infants Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1980 18: 65–8
Gilman JT, Gal P, Levine RS, Hersh CB, Erkan NV . Factors influencing theophylline disposition in 179 newborns Ther Drug Monit 1986 8: 4–10
Aranda JV, Turmen T, Sasynuik BI . Pharmacokinetics of diuretics and methylxanthines in the neonate Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1980 18: 55–63
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Reprints: Department of Pharmacy Services, Memorial Hermann Hospital, 6411 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hochwald, C., Kennedy, K., Chang, J. et al. A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial Comparing Two Loading Doses of Aminophylline. J Perinatol 22, 275–278 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210737
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210737