Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Review Article

Epidemiological, pathophysiological and clinical significance of systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 18, pages 531–533 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

Long-term population surveys and studies of untreated hypertensive patients both strongly suggest that over the age of about 45, the height of the systolic blood pressure is a better predictor of cardiovascular outcome than the diastolic pressure. Research into echocardiographic left ventricular size, endothelial function and thromborheology also back up this supposition. In clinical practice, the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension has been shown to be very worthwhile. There remains some uncertainty as to the relative significance of diastolic blood pressure when it is frankly high, as in severe systo-diastolic hypertension. However some clinicians and epidemiologists have questioned whether diastolic pressure is still worth measuring, given the overwhelming importance of the height of the systolic blood pressure at predicting outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. May O, Hyperpiesia IV . Mortality in relation to hyperpiesia. Br Med J 1925; ii: 1166–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kannel WB, Gordon T, Schwartz MJ . Systolic versus diastolic blood pressure and risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1971; 27: 335–345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lichtenstein MJ, Shipley MJ, Rose GA . Systolic and diastolic blood pressure as predictors of coronary heart mortality in the Whitehall Study. Br Med J 1985; 291: 243–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Franklin SS et al. Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart disease? The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1999; 100: 354–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilking SVB et al. Determinants of isolated systolic hypertension. JAMA 1988; 260: 3451–3455.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zakopoulos NA et al. Pulse pressure in normotensives, a marker for cardiovascular disease. Am J Hypertens 2001; 14: 195–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Staessen JA et al. Risk of untreated and treated isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: meta-analysis of outcome trials. Lancet 2000; 355: 865–872.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. White WB, Dey MH, Shulman P . Assessment of the daily blood pressure load as a determinant of cardiac function in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Am Heart J 1989; 118: 782–795.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Papademetriou V et al. Similar effects of isolated systolic hypertension and combined hypertension on left ventricular geometry and function. The LIFE Study. Am J Hypertens 2001; 14: 768–774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lip GYH, Blann AD, Beevers DG . Prothrombotic function, endothelial function and left ventricular hypertrophy in isolated systolic hypertension compared with systo-diastolic hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 1203–1207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. SHEP cooperative Research Group . Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. JAMA 1991; 265: 3255–3264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Staessen JA et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Lancet 1997; 350: 757–764.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beevers DG, Davies P, Johnston JH, Larkin H . The relative importance of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure treated hypertensives. Br J Clin Pract, Symp Suppl 1982; 15: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sever PS . Abandoning diastole. Br Med J 1998; 318: 1773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Strandberg TE et al. Isolated diastolic hypertension: pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure as predictors of mortality during a follow-up of up to 32 years. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 399–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cox DR . Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B 1972; 34: 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  17. He J, Whelton PK . Elevated systolic blood pressure or a risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease. J Hypertens 1999; 17 (Suppl 2): S7–S13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Black HR . The paradigm has shifted to systolic blood pressure. Hypertension 1999; 34: 386–387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Swales JD . Systolic versus diastolic pressure: paradigm shift or cycle? J Human Hypertens 2000; 14: 477–479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rose GA . Personal Communication, 1990.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK

    D G Beevers

Authors
  1. D G Beevers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D G Beevers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beevers, D. Epidemiological, pathophysiological and clinical significance of systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure. J Hum Hypertens 18, 531–533 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001702

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001702

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links