Abstract
Sphygmomanometers are usually sold with a single cuff though some are supplied with a short cuff as standard and offer a longer one for larger arms. However, data on the differences in measurements taken with different cuffs applied to different sized arms are conflicting and this study set out to investigate the difference between those taken with ‘normal’ and ‘large’ cuffs in arms 28 cm or more in circumference. We avoided observer error by using a semi-automatic digital sphygmomanometer, the Omron 705CP. The 22 subjects employed were selected from one general practice as having a range of previous office blood pressures and a variety of arm sizes above 28 cm in circumference. Omron ‘normal’ and ‘large’ cuffs were used alternately, taking five blood pressures with each to a total of 30 readings per patient, resulting in 660 readings, 330 with each cuff. There were mean systolic/diastolic differences of 2.7/3.8 (s.d.s 4.7/2.8) for all subjects. These were greater in the normotensive. When divided into two groups with systolic blood pressures below and equal to or above 140 mm Hg, differences were −1.9/3.0 to 7.1/4.7. From the results of the study, we recommend that large cuffs should be used for all patients with an arm circumference of 28 cm or above but the Omron large cuff still requires formal validation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aylett, M., Marples, G., Jones, K. et al. Evaluation of normal and large sphygmomanometer cuffs using the Omron 705CP. J Hum Hypertens 15, 131–134 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001133
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001133