Abstract
Numerous studies have reported short-term associations between ambient air pollution concentrations and mortality and morbidity. Particulate matter (PM) was often implicated as the most significant predictor of the health outcomes among the various air pollutants. However, a question remains as to the potential role played by the relative error of exposure estimation associated with each pollutant in defining their relative strengths of association. While most of the recent studies on PM exposure measurements have focused on the temporal correlation between personal exposures and the concentrations observed at ambient air quality monitors (within a few miles from the subjects), there have been few studies that systematically evaluated spatial uniformity of temporal correlation of air pollution within the scale of a city (several tens of miles) for which mortality or morbidity outcomes are aggregated in time-series studies. In this study, spatial uniformity of temporal correlation was examined by computing monitor-to-monitor correlation using available multiple monitors for PM10 and gaseous criteria pollutants (NO2, SO2, CO, and O3) in the nationwide data between 1988 and 1997. For each monitor, the median of temporal correlation with other monitors within the Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) was computed. The resulting median monitor-to-monitor correlation was modeled as a function of qualitative site characteristics (i.e., land-use, location-setting, and monitoring-objective) and quantitative information (median separation distance, longitude/latitude or regional indicators) for each pollutant. Generalized additive models (GAM) were used to fit the smooth function of the separation distance and regional variation. The intercepts of the models across pollutants showed the overall rankings in monitor-to-monitor correlation on the average to be: O3, NO2, and PM10, (r∼0.6 to 0.8)>CO (r<0.6)>SO2 (r<0.5). Both the separation distance and regional variation were important predictors of the correlation. For PM10, for example, the correlation for the monitors along the East Coast was higher by ∼0.2 than western regions. The qualitative monitor characteristics were often significant predictors of the variation in correlation, but their impacts were not substantial in magnitude for most categories. These results suggest that the apparent regional heterogeneity in PM effect estimates, as well as the differences in the significance of health outcome associations across pollutants, may in part be contributed to by the differences in monitor-to-monitor correlations by region and across pollutants.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chan C.C., and Hwang J.S. Site representativeness of urban air monitoring stations. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 1996: 46: 755–760.
Cleveland W.S. Robust locally-weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Statist Assoc 1979: 74: 829–836.
Dominici F., McDermott A., Zeger S.L., and Samet J.M. On the use of generalized additive models in time-series studies of air pollution and health. Am J Epidemiol 2002: 156: 193–203.
Ebelt S.T., Petkau A.J., Vedal S., Fisher T.V., and Brauer M. Exposure of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients to particulate matter: relationships between personal and ambient air concentrations. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2000: 50: 1081–1094.
Hastie T.J., and Tibshirani R.J. Generalized Additive Models. Chapman & Hall, New York, 1990.
Hwang J.S., and Chan C.C. Redundant measurements of urban air monitoring networks in air quality reporting. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 1997: 47: 614–619.
Insightful Corporation. 2001. S-Plus, Scattle, WA.
Ito K., Thurston G.D., Nadas A., and Lippmann M. Monitor-to-monitor temporal correlation of air pollution and weather variables in the North-Central US. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 2001: 11: 21–32.
Janssen N.A., Hoek G., Brunekreef B., Harssema H., Mensink I., and Zuidhof A. Personal sampling of particles in adults: relation among personal, indoor, and outdoor air concentrations. Am J Epidemiol 1998: 147: 537–547.
Janssen N.A., Hoek G., Brunekreef B., Harssema H., and Brunkreef B. Personal exposures to fine particles in children correlates closely with ambient fine particles. Arch Environ Health 1999: 54: 95–101.
Krewski D., Burnett R.T., Goldberg M.S., Hoover K., Siemiatycki J., Jerrett M., and Abrahamowicz M. Reanalysis of the Harvard Six Cities Study and the American Cancer Society Study of Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality: Investigators Report, Part I: Replication and Validation; Part II: Sensitivity Analyses, Health Effect Institute, Boston, MA, 2000.
Lioy P.J., Waldman J.M., Buckley T., Butler J., and Pietarinen C. The personal, indoor, and outdoor concentration of PM10 measured in an industrial community during the winter. Atmos Environ Part B 1990: 24: 57–66.
Lippmann M., Ito K., Nadas A., and Burnett R. Association of particulate matter components with daily mortality and morbidity in urban populations. Health Effects Institute Research Report Number 95. Health Effects Institute, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
Mage D., Wilson W., Hasselblad V., and Grant L. Assessment of human exposure to ambient particulate matter. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 1999: 49: 1280–1291.
Samet J.M., Zeger S.L., Dominici F., Curriero F., Coursac I., Dockery D., Schwartz J., and Zanobetti A. The national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study in the United States. Health Effects Institute Research Report Number 96 and 97. Health Effects Institute, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
Sarnat J.A., Koutrakis P., and Suh H.H. Assessing the relationship between personal particulate and gaseous exposures of senior citizens living in Baltimore, MD. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2000: 50: 1184–1198.
Sarnat J.A., Schwartz J., Catalano P.J., and Suh H.H. Gaseous pollutants in particulate matter epidemiology: confounders or surrogates? Environ Health Perspect 2001: 109: 1053–1061.
Suh H.H., Koutrakis P., and Spengler J.D. The relationship between aerosol acidity and ammonia in indoor environments. J Expos Anal Environ Epidem 1994: 4: 1–22.
Tamura K., Ando M., Sagai M., and Matsumoto Y. Estimation of levels of personal exposure to suspended particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide in Tokyo. Environ Sci (Tokyo) 1996: 4: 37–51.
U.S. EPA National Office for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter. EPA/600/P-95/001cF. Research Triangle Park, NC, 1996a.
U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter: Policy Assessment of Scientific and Technical Information OAQPS Staff Paper. EPA-452R-96-013. Research Triangle Park, NC, 1996b.
U.S. EPA Office of Air Programs Federal Air Quality Control Regions. Office of Air Programs Publications No. AP-102. Raleigh, NC, 1972.
U.S. EPA. National PM2.5 Speciation Program: Overview, Objectives, Requirements, and Approach., 1997, Available from http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/pmspec.html.
Wallace L. Indoor particles: a review. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 1996: 46: 98–126.
Zeger S.L., Thomas D., Dominici F., Samet J.M., Schwartz J., Dockery D., and Cohen A. Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences. Environ Health Perspect 2000: 108: 419–426.
Acknowledgements
This analysis was conducted as part of an EPA-funded PM Center Grant (R82-7351). The manuscript has not been reviewed by EPA and does not reflect EPA's policies. This research is also part of a Center Program supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES00260).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ito, K., De Leon, S., Thurston, G. et al. Monitor-to-monitor temporal correlation of air pollution in the contiguous US. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 15, 172–184 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500386
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500386
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Characterizing air pollution patterns on multiple time scales in urban areas: a landscape ecological approach
Urban Ecosystems (2014)
-
Community-level spatial heterogeneity of chemical constituent levels of fine particulates and implications for epidemiological research
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2011)
-
Comparison of different exposure settings in a case–crossover study on air pollution and daily mortality: counterintuitive results
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2011)
-
An examination of exposure measurement error from air pollutant spatial variability in time-series studies
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2010)
-
Spatial variation of airborne pollen over south-east France: characterization and implications for monitoring networks management
Aerobiologia (2008)