Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Validation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) by comparison with chemical analysis of dogs and cats

International Journal of Obesity volume 25, pages 439–447 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been used extensively to measure body composition, but has been validated by comparison to chemical analysis on relatively few occasions. Moreover, these previous validation studies have ground up entire carcasses prior to chemical analysis, thus potentially obscuring sources of error in the DXA analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to validate DXA by comparison to chemical analysis in dogs and cats, performing chemical analysis on dissected rather than ground carcasses to reveal sources of discrepancy between the two methods.

DESIGN: Sixteen animals (10 cats and 6 dogs weighing between 1.8 and 22.1 kg) were scanned by DXA post-mortem using a Hologic QDR-1000 W pencil beam machine and then dissected into 22 separate components. Individual tissues were dried and then sub-sampled for analysis of fat content by Soxholet extraction, or ashing in a muffle furnace. Body composition by DXA was compared to body composition by chemical analysis and discrepancies between the two correlated with chemical composition of individual tissues. We also explored the capability of the machine to establish the fat contents of mixtures of ground beef, lard and water.

RESULTS: DXA estimates were strongly correlated with estimates derived from chemical analysis: total body mass (r=1.00), lean tissue mass (r=0.999), body water content (r=0.992) and fat mass (r=0.982). Across individuals the absolute and percentage discrepancies were also small: total body mass (13.2 g, 1.02%), lean tissue mass (119.4 g, 2.64%), water content (101 g, 1.57%) and fat content (28.5 g, 2.04%), where the percentage error is expressed relative to the average mass of that component across all individuals. Although on average DXA compared very well to chemical analysis, individual errors were much greater. Individual errors in the lean tissue and fat tissue components were strongly correlated with the fat content of skeletal muscle and the lean content of mesenteric fat. The error in the DXA estimate of total fat content was related to skeletal muscle hydration. Experimental studies using mixtures of lean ground beef, water and lard indicated that tissue hydration may have important effects on the perception of tissue fat content by DXA. Bone mineral content by DXA was approximately 30% lower than whole body ash content but only 7.7% lower than ash content of the bones.

CONCLUSIONS: On average pencil beam DXA analysis using the Hologic QDR-1000 W machine provides an accurate estimate of body composition in subjects weighing between 1.8 and 22.1 kg. Individual discrepancies, however, can be large and appear to be related to lean tissue hydration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pichard C, Kyle UG, Gremion G, Gerbase M, Slosman DO . Body composition by X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance in female runners Med Sci Sports Exercise 1997 29: 1527–1534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hendel HW, Gotfriedsen A, Hojgaard L, Andersen T, Hilsted J . Change in fat-free mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance, total body potassium and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry during prolonged weight loss Scand J Clin lab Invest 1996 56: 671–679.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Podenphant J, Gotfriedsen A, Engelhart M, Andersen V, Heitmann BL, Kondrup J . Comparison of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to other estimates of body composition during weight loss in obese patients with rheumatoid arthritis Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1996 56: 615–625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nau KL, Dick AR, Peters K, Schloerb PR . Relative validity of clinical techniques for measuring the body composition of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis J Neurol Sci 1997 152: S36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pichard C, Kyle UG, Janssens JP, Burdet L, Rochat T, Slosman DO, Fitting JW, Theiband D, Roulet M, Tschopp JM, Landry M, Schutz Y . Body composition by X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance in chronic respiratory insufficiency patients Nutrition 1997 13: 11–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paton NIJ, MacAllan DC, Jebb SA, Noble C, Baldwin C, Pazianias M, Griffin GE . Longitudinal changes in body composition measured with a variety of methods in patients with AIDS J AIDS Syn Hum retrovirol 1997 14: 119–127.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Royall D, Greenberg GR, Allard JP, Baker JP, Harrison JE, Jeejeebhoy KN . Critical assessment of body composition measurements in malnourished subjects with Crohns-disease—the role of bioelectrical impedance analysis Am J Clin Nutr 1994 59: 325–330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sievanan H, Backstrom MC, Kuusela AL, Ikonen RS Maki M . Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm in preterm and term infants: evaluation of the methodology Pediat Res 1999 45: 100–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lapillonne A, Braillon PM, Delmas PD, Salle BL . Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in early life Horm Res 1997 48: 43–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cochat P, Braillon P, Feber J, HadjAissa A, Dubourg L, Liponski I, Said MH, Glastre C, Meunier PJ, David L . Body composition in children with renal disease: use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Pediat Nephrol 1996 10: 264–268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Coleman RJ, Hudson JC, Barden HS, Kemnitz JW . A comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and somatometrics for determining body fat in rhesus macaques Obes Res 1999 7: 90–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Madsen OR, Jemsen JEB, Sorensen OH . Validation of a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer: measurement of bone mass and soft-tissue composition Eur J Appl Phys Occup Phys 1997 75: 554–558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen MB, Hermann AP, Hessov I, Moskilde L . Components of variance when assessing the reproducibility of body composition measurements using bio-impedance and the Hologic QDR-2000 DXA scanner Clin Nutr 1997 16: 61–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Haarbo J, Gotfredsen A, Hassager C, Christiansen C . Validation of body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) Clin Phys 1991 11: 331–341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pintuaro SJ, Nagy TR, Duthie CM, Goran MI . Cross calibration of fat and lean measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to pig carcass analysis in the pediatric body weight range Am J Clin Nutr 1996 63: 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brunton JA, Bayley HS, Atkinson SA . Validation and application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mass and body composition in small infants Am J Clin Nutr 1993 58: 839–845.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Picaud JC, Rigo J, Nyamugabo K, Milet J, Senterre J . Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body-composition assessment in piglets and term human neonates Am J Clin Nutr 1996 63: 157–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ellis KJ, Shypailo RJ, Pratt JA, Pond WG . Accuracy of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition measurements in children Am J Clin Nutr 1994 60: 660–665.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Svedsen OL, Haarbo J, Hassager C, Christiansen C . Accuracy of measurements of body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in vivo Am J Clin Nutr 1993 57: 605–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brunton JA, Weiler HA, Atkinson SA . Improvement in the accuracy of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for whole body and regional analysis of body composition: validation using piglets and methodologic considerations in infants Pediat Res 1997 41: 590–596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitchell AD, Conway JM, Potts WJE . Body composition of pigs by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry J Anim Sci 1996 74: 2663–2671.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitchell AD, Conway JM, Scholz AM . Incremental changes in total and regional body composition of growing pigs measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry Growth Dev Aging 1996 60: 95–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fusch C, Slotboom J, Fuehrer U, Schumacher R, Keisker A, Zimmermann W, Moessinger A, Boesch C, Blum J . Neonatal body composition: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, magnetic resonance imaging, and three-dimensional chemical shift imaging versus chemical analysis in piglets. Pediat Res 1999 46: 465–473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hologic QBD1000 Instruction manual.

  25. Munday HS . Assessment of body compositionin cats and dogs Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1994 18 (Suppl 1): S14–S21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Snead DB, Birge SJ, Kohrt WM . Age-related differences in body composition by hydrodensitometry and dual x-ray absorptiometry J Appl Physiol 1993 74: 770–775.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lapillonne A, Braillon PM, Claris O, Ho PS, Delmas PD, Salle BL . Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measurements of small quantities of mineral Biol Neonate 1997 71: 198–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Son HR, Avignon A, La Flamme DP . Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and measurement of total body water content by deuterium oxide dilution for estimating body composition in dogs Am J Vet Res 1998 59: 529–532.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nord RH, Payne RK . A new equation set for converting body density to percent body fat Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr 1995 4: 177–179.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pietrobelli A, Wang ZM, Formica C, Heymsfield SB . Am J Physiol 1998 37: E808–E816.

  31. Going SB, Massett MP, Hall MC et al. Detection of small changes in body composition by dual x-ray absorptiometry Am J Clin Nutr 1993 57: 845–850.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Barbeau P, Gutin B, Litaker M, Owens S, Riggs S, Okuyama T . Correlates of individual differences in body-composition changes resulting from physical training in obese children Am J Clin Nutr 1999 69: 705–711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kelly TL, Steiger P, Shepherd JA . Body composition determinations using fan beam technology Meeting abstract, International Congress on Obesity Paris August 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Guo SS, Wisemandle WA, Tyleshevski FE, Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Siervogel RM, Speckler B, Heubi J . Inter-machine and inter-method differences in body composition measures from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry Nutr Health Aging 1997 1: 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Pat Nugent, Phil Anderson and Helen Munday for technical assistance with the DXA scanning and to Maria Johnson, Diane Jackson, Susan Thomson, Richard Delahay, Emma Williams and Eric Swanepoel for assistance with the dissection and chemical composition work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Aberdeen Centre for Energy Regulation and Obesity (ACERO), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK

    JR Speakman

  2. Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition, Waltham-on-the Wolds, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, England, UK

    D Booles & R Butterwick

Authors
  1. JR Speakman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D Booles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R Butterwick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JR Speakman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Speakman, J., Booles, D. & Butterwick, R. Validation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) by comparison with chemical analysis of dogs and cats. Int J Obes 25, 439–447 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801544

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801544

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links