Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Research
  • Published:

Long-term efficacy and compliance of MUSE for erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: SHIM (IIEF-5) analysis

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 12 March 2008

Abstract

Baseline and follow-up data of 54 patients from a single surgical series (1998–2001), who used medicated urethral system for erection (MUSE) for the erectile dysfunction (ED) associated with radical prostatectomy (RP), were obtained. Patients were surveyed using the abridged five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, commonly referred to as the Sexual Health Inventory of Men (SHIM), to determine presence and severity of ED and efficacy of ED treatment modalities. The mean patient age was 63.7±5.6 y and the mean follow-up period was 2.3±1.2 y. All patients experienced ED for at least 6 months after their surgery before starting MUSE therapy. Overall, 55% of the patients achieved and maintained erections sufficient for sexual intercourse while on MUSE and 48% continued long-term therapy with a mean use of 2.32±1.2 y. The mean presurgery SHIM score in these patients was 19.2±1.3, which decreased to 5.2±0.5 after surgery and increased to 16.3±1.3 after MUSE treatment. A total of 28 patients (52%) discontinued treatment after a mean use of 8±1.4 months. The reasons for discontinuation were insufficient erections (n=16, mean SHIM score of 10.5±4.4), switch to other ED therapies (n=4), natural return of erections (n=4) and urethral pain and burning (n=4). Excluding the patients (n=8) who preferred other therapies and return of natural erections, the compliance to MUSE was 63%. There were no significant differences in the IIEF-5 responses between the patients who had a nerve-sparing technique (n=34) and those who did not (n=20) or among patients who used different doses (250, 500 or 1000 μg) of MUSE. The results of the current trial indicate that MUSE is a successful treatment option in RP patients with established ED. It appears that a post-treatment SHIM score of ≥16 defines a successful outcome with MUSE therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zippe CD et al. Management of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep 2001; 2: 495–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zippe CD et al. Role of viagra after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 55: 241–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilke RJ et al. Quality of life effects of alprostadil therapy for erectile dysfunction. J Urol 1997; 157: 2124–2129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Porst H . The rationale for prostaglandin E1 in erectile failure: a survey of worldwide experience. J Urol 1996; 155: 802–815.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Padma-Nathan H et al. Treatment of men with erectile dysfunction with transurethral alprostadil. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fulgham PF et al. Disappointing initial results with transurethral alprostadil for erectile dysfunction in a urology practice setting. J Urol 1998; 160: 2041–2046.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Costabile RA et al. Safety of transurethral alprostadil in patients with erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1997; 157: 1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Montorsi F et al. Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 1997; 161: 1914–1915.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen RC et al. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen RC et al Development and evaluation of an Abridged 5-Item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999; 11: 319–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Porst H . Transurethral alprostadil with MUSE versus intracavernous alprostadil: a comparative study in 103 patients with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1997; 9: 187–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nehra A, Blute ML, Barrett DM, Moreland RB . Rationale for combination therapy of intraurethral prostaglandin E1 and sildenafil in the salvage of erectile dysfunction patients desiring noninvasive therapy. Int J Impot Res 2002; 14(Suppl 1): S38–S42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C D Zippe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raina, R., Agarwal, A., Ausmundson, S. et al. Long-term efficacy and compliance of MUSE for erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: SHIM (IIEF-5) analysis. Int J Impot Res 17, 86–90 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901284

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901284

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links