Abstract
Hypertension is associated with an increased risk of diastolic dysfunction. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) have failed to show improvement in clinical outcomes for patients with diastolic dysfunction. In this study, we investigated the effect of changing an ACEi or ARB to a combination of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on left ventricular (LV) preload and relaxation in patients with hypertension and diastolic dysfunction. We enrolled 371 hypertensive patients with diastolic dysfunction who had not achieved their treatment goals with an ACEi or ARB. We switched the ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ and followed the patients for 24 weeks. The primary end points were changes in septal mitral annular velocity during diastole (e′) and in the ratio of mitral inflow velocity to e′ velocity (E/e′ ratio) from baseline to the end of follow-up. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BP) decreased by 22 and 11 mm Hg, respectively, after changing from an ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ. The e′ velocity increased, and the E/e′ ratio and brain natriuretic peptide level decreased significantly. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein also decreased significantly (0.50 vs. 0.29 mg dl−1, P<0.0001). There were only slight or no changes in glucose levels, homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-R), uric acid and electrolytes after the drug change. Changing from an ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ is associated with a reduction in BP, improvement in LV relaxation, improvement in heart failure state and attenuation of systemic inflammation with few adverse effects in patients with hypertension and diastolic dysfunction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Diastolic dysfunction is the most common cause of heart failure (HF) in patients with hypertension.1 Diastolic HF is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, and the risk of adverse outcomes increases with the severity of diastolic dysfunction.2 Patients with diastolic dysfunction have increased activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, as do patients with systolic HF, which contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of the condition. However, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) have failed to show a benefit with regard to mortality or morbidity.3, 4, 5 Thiazide is useful for reducing volume load in patients with diastolic dysfunction.6 However, thiazide monotherapy has not been widely used in patients with diastolic dysfunction. Decreases in blood pressure (BP) are blunted by hypovolemia-induced activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. Thiazide monotherapy involves risks of dysglycemia and/or dyslipidemia, and of elevation of C-reactive protein (CRP).7 To resolve these problems, a small dose of thiazide in combination with an ACEi or ARB is given to allow for the full antihypertensive effect of thiazide and to minimize its adverse effects. However, it remains unknown whether this combination therapy can improve diastolic function or HF state and, if so, which factor has the principal role in the improvement of HF: reduction in left ventricular (LV) pre-load, improvement in its relaxation or both.
To answer these questions, we conducted a prospective, multi-center study to test the hypothesis that changing from an ACEi or ARB to losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) can improve LV diastolic function in patients with hypertension and diastolic dysfunction. The aims of this study were (1) to elucidate the impact of changing from an ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ on LV preload, relaxation and severity of HF; (2) to determine the responders and non-responders to combination therapy; and (3) to determine the impact of this drug change on the metabolism of glucose, lipids, uric acid, electrolytes and CRP.
Methods
Study population
Men and women from 20 to 80 years of age, with a history of stage 1 or 2 essential hypertension (mean BP measurement of >140 mm Hg systolic or >90 mm Hg diastolic), who were receiving treatment with an ACEi or ARB, were screened for inclusion by assessing their systolic and diastolic functions with echocardiography. Mitral annular relaxation velocity of ⩽8 cm s−1 was used to make a diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction. The exclusion criteria were an LV ejection fraction of <50%, septal mitral annular relaxation velocity >8 cm s−1, receiving treatment with diuretics and atrial fibrillation at baseline. The study protocol was approved by individual sites and written informed consent was obtained from all patients before any study procedures.
Study protocol
The patients were followed at least for 4 weeks to observe that target BP, <130/80 mm Hg, was not achieved with an ACEi or ARB. All patients underwent echocardiographic screening for systolic and diastolic functions before the start of treatment with losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg. Then, the administration of ACEi or ARB was stopped, and ACEi or ARB was replaced with losartan/HCTZ. No other medications were changed throughout the study period. BP and heart rate were measured in a sitting position at each study visit. The adequacy of anti-hypertensive therapy was determined on the basis of measured BP. The use of concomitant antihypertensive medication was recorded at each study visit. If BP was not adequately controlled, add-on treatment other than diuretics was considered, but such subjects were dropped from this study. Patients were assessed at 4–8-week intervals for at least 24 weeks and underwent echocardiographic assessment at the end of the study. Blood and urine tests were also performed at baseline and at the end of the study.
Echocardiographic data analysis
From the mitral flow velocity pattern, we measured the peak velocities of E and A waves on mitral flow velocity, the ratio of their peak velocities (E/A ratio), the isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) and the deceleration time of the E wave. Spectral pulsed-wave Doppler tissue interrogation of longitudinal mitral annular velocity was recorded throughout the cardiac cycle at the septal annulus in the apical four-chamber view. The peaks of apically directed systolic (s′ velocity) and early diastolic (e′ velocity) myocardial velocities were measured. Additional exploratory analyses included changes in chamber dimensions and the LV ejection fraction. LV mass was measured by using the American Society of Echocardiography-recommended formula and the end-systolic left atrial volume was measured by using the ellipsoid model.8 Both values were indexed with body surface area in m2.
The primary endpoints were changes in e′ velocity and in the ratio of mitral inflow velocity to e′ velocity (E/e′ ratio) from baseline to follow-up. The secondary efficacy measures included differences in changes in BP, heart rate, wall thickness, the LV mass index and the left atrial volume index from baseline to follow-up. Blood samples were collected for measurements of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP), along with additional exploratory blood analyses, and urine was collected for measurement of albumin concentrations.
Statistical analysis
All of the results are expressed as the mean±s.d. or proportions (%). Student's t-test was used for parametric data when a normal distribution and equal dispersion were recognized. The Welch’s t-test was used when the variance was unequal. The paired t-test was used for comparing temporal changes in data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the independent factors related to changes in systolic BP, e′ velocity and E/e′ with changes from ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ. Differences in the categorical data were analyzed by a χ2 test and Fisher's exact test was used when appropriate. Differences were considered to be statistically significant when P-values were <0.05.
Results
After echocardiographic screening, 415 patients with a history of treated or untreated hypertension were enrolled in this study between October 2008 and November 2009. Forty-four patients were excluded from this study, including 32 patients who were lost to follow-up, 7 patients who were excluded for protocol violation, 3 patients who were excluded for poor adherence and 2 patients who were excluded for atrial fibrillation at follow-up. Follow-up study was completed in 371 (89%) of the patients. Baseline characteristics, medication use and echocardiographic parameters before changing to losartan/HCTZ are shown in Table 1. The average interval between baseline and follow-up was approximately 6 months (range, 133–308 days). No patients died, developed HF or cardiovascular events or were admitted to the hospital in the course of the study.
The effect of change from ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ on BP, echocardiographic parameters and laboratory data
At follow-up, the mean systolic and diastolic BPs and pulse pressure decreased from baseline by 23, 11 and 12 mm Hg, respectively (Table 2). Heart rate decreased by 2 beats min−1. Additional hypertensive medications were given to only 26 patients (7%) and the medications given to most patients were calcium channel blockers (24 patients (6.5%)). The LV wall thickness, LV mass index and left atrial volume were significantly decreased 6 months after changing to losartan/HCTZ. There were no changes in peak E, deceleration time or E/A ratio. The e′ velocity significantly increased (5.5–6.5 cm s−1, P<0.0001), implying an improvement in LV relaxation. The E/e′ ratio significantly decreased, from 12.1 to 10.6 at follow-up (P<0.0001), indicating a decrease in LV preload. IVRT also decreased significantly (120–113 ms, P<0.0001). Although there was no change in the LV ejection fraction after changing to losartan/HCTZ, s′ velocity significantly increased, suggesting improvement in LV long-axis contractile function.
BNP levels decreased after changing from ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ (48.6 vs. 36.6 pg dl−1, P=0.0006). Interestingly, hsCRP levels showed a significant reduction after changing to losartan/HCTZ. Urine albumin concentrations also decreased at follow-up. Microalbuminemia (⩾30 mg per g Cr) was present in 73 patients (19.7%) at baseline, but was present in only 49 patients (13.2%) after 6 months of changing to losartan/HCTZ. There were slight increases in serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, and a slight decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate at follow-up. In all patients, uric acid did not show a significant change after changing to losartan/HCTZ. In patients with low uric acid levels (<7.0 mg dl−1) at baseline it increased slightly, and it decreased in patients with a high uric acid level (⩾7.0 mg dl−1) at baseline. There were no changes in fasting glucose levels, hemoglobin A1c, fasting insulin levels or homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-R) after changing to losartan/HCTZ.
Factors related to changes in e′ velocity and E/e′ ratio
We studied the impact of the magnitude of reduction in systolic BP with drug changes on e′ velocity and the E/e′ ratio. A greater reduction in systolic BP was associated with a greater increase in e′ velocity and a greater reduction in the E/e′ ratio (Figure 1). There was a close relationship between changes in s′ velocity and changes in e′ velocity (Figure 2).
We analyzed baseline factors related to the magnitude of changes in systolic BP, e′ velocity and the E/e′ ratio with a change from ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ (Table 3). The factors included age, sex, diabetes, body mass index, New York Hypertension Association (NYHA) class, systolic BP, pulse pressure, heart rate, hsCRP, HOMA-R, BNP, estimated glomerular filtration rate, LV mass index, left atrial volume index and microalbuminemia. Multivariate analysis showed that baseline systolic BP and NYHA class were independent factors (P<0.05) related to the magnitude of reduction in systolic BP after changing to losartan/HCTZ. Multivariate analysis also showed that age, body mass index, NYHA class, systolic BP and hsCRP were independent factors related to changes in e′ velocity after changing to losartan/HCTZ. NYHA class, systolic BP and hsCRP were independent factors related to the magnitude of changes in the E/e′ ratio after changing to losartan/HCTZ.
As baseline hsCRP is an independent factor related to changes in e′ velocity and the E/e′ ratio, we compared temporal changes in these parameters in patients with high hsCRP (⩾2.0 mg dl−1) and those with low hsCRP (<0.2 mg dl−1) (Figure 3). Reductions in the E/e′ ratio and increases in e′ velocity were greater in patients with high hsCRP at baseline. We studied the impact of NYHA class on changes in e′ velocity and the E/e′ ratio after changing to losartan/HCTZ. Our data showed that increases in e′ velocity and decreases in the E/e′ ratio were greater in patients with NYHA class 2 or 3 than in patients with NYHA class 1.
Adverse events
Adverse events were observed in 22 patients. The adverse events included photosensitivity or skin eruption (11 patients), dizziness (5 patients), general fatigue (4 patients), an increase in BP (1 patient) and worsening of renal function (1 patient). Losartan/HCTZ was withdrawn in 14 patients and they were dropped from the study.
Discussion
We showed that changes from ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ further lowered BP, improved LV relaxation (an increase in e′ velocity), reduced LV preload (a decrease in the E/e′ ratio), and improved HF state (a decrease in BNP) in patients with hypertension and diastolic dysfunction. The drug change was also associated with reductions in hsCRP. We first documented that the change from ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ could improve LV relaxation and HF in patients with diastolic dysfunction, and that these improvements were associated with attenuation of systemic inflammation.
The optimization of hemodynamics is achieved primarily by reducing cardiac preload and afterload in patients with diastolic dysfunction. An ACEi or ARB may affect myocardial relaxation and compliance by reducing BP and arterial stiffness and by reducing interstitial collagen deposition, but it cannot reduce LV preload. Diuretics are effective for reducing LV preload. Our results showed that changing an ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ is associated with a reduction of the E/e′ ratio and an increase in e′ velocity. A decrease in IVRT after the drug change also suggests an improvement in LV relaxation. IVRT is sensitive to LV preload and relaxation. In the case of reduced preload, IVRT decreases only when LV relaxation improves, as shown in this study. The combination of improvement in LV relaxation and a decrease in preload can be attributed to a reduced left atrial volume index and BNP level at follow-up.
There are several mechanisms by which e′ velocity can increase with changes from ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ. Reductions in systolic BP themselves can be associated with increases in e′ velocity.9, 10, 11 The CALVLOC (Clinical Impact of Azelnidipine on Left VentricuLar Diastolic Function and OutComes in Patients with Hypertension) trial documented that a reduction in systolic BP with a calcium channel blocker, azelnidipine, was associated with an increase in e′ velocity.10 This study showed that a greater increase in s′ velocity after changing to losartan/HCTZ was associated with a greater increase in e′ velocity. Many patients with diastolic dysfunction may have subtle abnormalities of systolic contractile function. The LV longitudinal contractile function is a primary contributor to LV pumping and is particularly sensitive to the effects of afterload.12 It is speculated that further reduction in afterload with losartan/HCTZ can improve LV longitudinal contractile function (an increase in s′ velocity), resulting in improvement of LV relaxation. Reduction of the LV mass index can also contribute to improvement in LV relaxation.13
In this study, hsCRP significantly decreased with changes from ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ. CRP level is a marker of systemic inflammation. Higher levels of CRP are associated with higher BP.14 CRP levels are also elevated in patients with diastolic dysfunction, and they correlate with disease severity, as well as LV preload.15 The mechanism of CRP elevation in patients with diastolic dysfunction has not been elucidated. Organ congestion and hypoperfusion might influence the secretion of interleukin-6 by hepatic, renal, endothelial, mononuclear and even cardiac myocytes.16 Elevated inflammatory markers have been associated with an increased risk of developing symptomatic HF.17 CRP may be an active participant in the development of diastolic dysfunction. CRP can inhibit nitric oxide production, impede endothelial function and activate the complement cascade.18 Interleukin-6, which affects CRP, has been shown to promote myocyte hypertrophy.19 Reductions in BP and LV preload with changes to losartan/HCTZ may contribute to a reduction in CRP. Therefore, the attenuation of the systemic inflammatory response with changes to losartan/HCTZ may contribute to the improvement of LV diastolic function.
Previous studies have suggested that BNP,20 the left atrial volume index,21 the LV mass index22 and hsCRP are useful for risk stratification in patients with HF. A lower BNP, left atrial volume index or LV mass index is associated with better clinical outcomes, and lower rates of morbidity and mortality. These parameters are now regarded as excellent surrogate end points for assessing the utility of therapeutic interventions. Our results showed that BNP, the left atrial volume index and the LV mass index significantly decreased with changes from ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ. Therefore, the combination of an ARB and a small dose of thiazide might be a good therapeutic choice for reducing hospitalization due to HF, and mortality in patients with hypertension and diastolic dysfunction.
Much of the criticism against thiazides has been directed toward their adverse-effect profile. Thiazides can reduce the excretion of uric acid and thereby increase its plasma level. Our results, however, showed that there was no change in uric acid levels with changes from ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ. This finding was because of the potential of losartan to augment the excretion of uric acid.23 Some patients with diastolic dysfunction are sensitive to preload reduction and may develop severe pre-renal azotemia. In this study, blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels showed only slight increases with changes to losartan/HCTZ. New-onset diabetes has been reported in patients receiving thiazides.24 Maintaining potassium homeostasis is essential because epidemiologic evidence implicates hypokalemia in the pathogenesis of thiazide-induced dysglycemia.25 In this study, there were no changes in potassium levels or levels of blood glucose, HbA1c, serum insulin and HOMA-R after changing to losartan/HCTZ.
Limitations
Some limitations should be noted. This study was a single-arm trial. The main objective of this study was not to monitor clinical outcomes, but to detect changes in objective parameters to assess the change made upon LV diastolic function after changing from ACEi or ARB to losartan/HCTZ. We did not simply add a small dose of HCTZ to each ACEi or ARB, but changed them to losartan/HCTZ to improve patient adherence. Only three patients dropped out because of poor adherence. Most of the patients were mildly to moderately hypertensive and without clinical HF. The findings in this study may not be applicable to patients with severe diastolic dysfunction. In this study, however, the magnitude of increase in e′ velocity was greater and the magnitude of decrease in the E/e′ ratio was also greater in patients with symptomatic HF. It is not clear whether an increase in e′ velocity by 1.0 cm s−1 or decrease in the E/e′ ratio by 1.5 is clinically meaningful or whether it would be associated over time with improvement in outcomes.
References
Levy D, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Kannel WB, Ho KK . The progression from hypertension to congestive heart failure. JAMA 1996; 275: 1557–1562.
Aurigemma GP . Diastolic heart failure–a common and lethal condition by any name. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 308–310.
Cleland JGF, Tendera M, Adamus J, Freemantle N, Polonski L, Taylor J, on behalf of PEP-CHF Investigators. The perindopril in elderly people with chronic heart failure (PEP-CHF) study. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2338–2345.
Massie VM, Carson PE, McMurray JJ, Komajda M, McKelvie R, Zile MR, Anderson S, Donovan M, Iverson E, Staiger C, Ptaszynska A, for the I-PRESERVE Investigators. Irbesartan inpatients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2456–2467.
Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, McMurray JJ, Michelson EL, Olofsson B, Ostergren J . Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 777–781.
Davis BR, Piller LB, Cutler JA, Furberg C, Dunn K, Franklin S, Goff D, Leenen F, Mohiuddin S, Papademetriou V, Proschan M, Ellsworth A, Golden J, Colon P, Crow R, for the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) Collaborative Research Group. Role of diuretics in the prevention of heart failure. The antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial. Circulation 2006; 113: 2201–2210.
Savage PJ, Pressel SL, Curb JD, Schron EB, Applegate WB, Black HR, Cohen J, Davis BR, Frost P, Smith W, Gonzalez N, Guthrie GP, Oberman A, Rutan G, Probstfield JL, Stamler J, for the SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Influence of long-term, low-dose, diuretic-based, antihypertensive therapy on glucose, lipid, uric acid, and potassium levels in older men and women with isolated systolic hypertension: the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 741–751.
Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, Solomon SD, Spencer KT, Sutton MS, Stewart WJ, Chamber Quantification Writing Group; American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee; European Association of Echocardiography. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's guidelines and standards committee and the chamber quantification writing group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 1440–1463.
Solomon SD, Janardhanan R, Verma A, Bourgoun M, Daley WL, Purkayastha D, Lacourciere Y, Hippler SE, Fields H, Naqvi TZ, Mulvagh SL, Arnold JM, Thomas JD, Zile MR, Aurigemma GP, for the Valsartan in Diastolic Dysfunction (VALIDD) Investigators. Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade and antihypertensive drugs on diastolic function in patients with hypertension and diastolic dysfunction: a randomised trial. Lancet 2007; 369: 2079–2087 (VALIDD).
Ito H, Ishii K, Iwakura K, Nakamura F, Nagano T, Takiuchi S, for the Clinical impact of Azelnidipine on Left VentricuLar diastolic function and OutComes in patients with hypertension (CALVLOC) trial investigators. Impact of Azelnidipine treatment on left ventricular diastolic performance in patients with hypertension and mild diastolic dysfunction: multi-center study with echocardiography. Hypertension Res 2009; 32: 895–900.
Solomon SD, Verma A, Desai A, Hassanein A, Izzo J, Oparil S, Lacourciere Y, Lee J, Seifu Y, Hilkert RJ, do Rocha R, Pitt B, for the Exforge Intensive Control of Hypertension to Evaluate Efficacy in Diastolic Dysfunction Investigators. Effect of intensive versus standard blood pressure lowering on diastolic function in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and diastolic dysfunction. Hypertension 2010; 55: 241–248.
Carlsson M, Ugander M, Mosen H, Buhre T, Arheden H . Atrioventricular plane displacement is the major contributor to left ventricular pumping in healthy adults, athletes, and patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007; 292: H1452–H1459.
Devereux RB, Dahlof B, Gerdts E, Boman K, Nieminen MS, Papademetriou V, Rokkedal J, Harris KE, Edelman JM, Wachtell K . Regression of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy by losartan compared with atenolol: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) trial. Circulation 2004; 110: 1456–1462.
Smith GD, Lawlor DA, Harbord R, Timpson N, Rumley A, Lowe GDO, Day INM, Ebrahim S . Association of C-reactive protein with blood pressure and hypertension: Life course confounding and mendelian randomization tests of causality. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25: 1051–1056.
Williams ES, Shah SJ, Ali S, Na BY, Schiller NB, Whooley MA . C-reactive protein, diastolic dysfunction, and risk of heart failure in patients with coronary disease: Heart and Soul Study. Eur J Heart Fail 2008; 10: 63–69.
Lagrand WK, Visser CA, Hermens WT, Niessen HWM, Verheugt FWA, Wolbink GJ, Hack CE . C-reactive protein as a cardiovascular risk factor: more than an epiphenomenon? Circulation 1999; 100: 96–102.
Blake GJ, Rifai N, Burning JE, Ridker PM . Blood pressure, C-reactive protein, and risk of future cardiovascular events. Circulation 2003; 108: 2993–2999.
Pasceri V, Willerson JT, Yeh ET . Direct proinflammatory effect of Creactive protein on human endothelial cells. Circulation 2000; 102: 2165–2168.
Wollert KC, Drexler H . The role of interleukin-6 in the failing heart. Heart Fail Rev 2001; 6: 95–103.
Doust JA, Pietrzak E, Dobson A . How well does B-type natriuretic peptide predict death and cardiac events in patients with heart failure: systematic review. BMJ 2005; 330: 625.
Ristow B, Ali S, Whooley MA, Schiller NB . Usefulness of left atrial volume index to predict heart failure hospitalization and mortality in ambulatory patients with coronary heart disease and comparison to left ventricular ejection fraction (from the Heart and Soul Study). Am J Cardiol 2008; 102: 70–76.
Devereux RB, Wachtell K, Gerdts E, Boman K, Nieminen MS, Papademetriou V, Rokkedal J, Harris K, Aurup P, Dahlöf B . Prognostic significance of left ventricular mass change during treatment of hypertension. JAMA 2004; 292: 2350–2356.
Hamada T, Ichida K, Hosoyamada M, Mizuta E, Yanagihara K, Sonoyama K, Sugihara S, Igawa O, Hosoya T, Ohtahara A, Shigamasa C, Yamamoto Y, Ninomiya H, Hisatome I . Uricosuric action of Losartan via the Inhibition of Urate transporter 1 (URAT 1) in hypertensive patient. Am J Hypertension 2008; 21: 1157–1162.
Messerli FH, Bangalore S, Julius S . Risk/benefit assessment of beta-blockers and diuretics precludes their use for first line therapy in hypertension. Circulation 2008; 117: 2706–2715.
Carter BL, Einhorn PT, Brands M, He J, Cutler JA, Whelton PK, Bakris GL, Brancati FL, Cushman WC, Oparil S, Wright Jr JT . Thiazide-induced dysglycemia: call for research from a working group from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Hypertension 2008; 52: 30–36.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Osaka Prevention Institute for Cancer and the Cardiovascular Diseases Foundation. The authors also thank the EDEN trial investigators: Etsuko Fushimi, MD (Hiraga General Hospital, Yokote, Japan), Lim Young-Jae, MD (Kawachi General Hospital, Higashiosaka, Japan), Shin Takiuchi, MD (Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Japan), Junichi Nakagawa, MD (Sankeikai-Nakagawa Clinic, Amagasaki, Japan), Hen Yasuki, MD (Sakakibara Heart Institute Clinic, Fuchu, Japan), Kei Tawarahara, MD (Hamamatus Red Cross Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan), Akihiro Tani, MD (Kano General Hospital, Osaka, Japan), Hiroyuki Watanabe, MD (Sakakibara Heart Institute, Fuchu, Japan), Hiroshi Matsuura; MD (Matsuura Clinic of Medicine, Suita, Japan), Takeshi Takami, MD (Clinic Jinguumae, Kashihara, Japan), Shigenori Sassa, MD (Sassa Medical Clinic, Osaka, Japan), Yasuji Doi, MD (Osaka Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Suita, Japan), Taro Minagawa; MD (Minagawa Clinic, Gifu, Japan), Yukio Abe, MD (Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan), Yoshio Kawase, MD (Izumi City General Hospital, Izumi, Japan), Toshihiko Nagano, MD (Iwasa Dai-ichi Hospital, Gifu, Japan), Naoki Gotoh, MD (Gotoh Clinic, Gifu, Japan), Kazunori Kasiwase, MD (Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan), Tsunemori Sakamoto, MD (Baba Memorial Hospital, Sakai, Japan), Keiji Ujino, MD (Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Japan), Masahiro Yoshida, MD (Tsukushino Hospital, Fukui, Japan), Takahiko Kawarabayashi, MD (Higashisumiyoshi Morimoto Hospital, Osaka, Japan), and Yukinori Okazaki, MD (NTT West Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Ito, H., Ishii, K., Kihara, H. et al. Adding thiazide to a renin–angiotensin blocker improves left ventricular relaxation and improves heart failure in patients with hypertension. Hypertens Res 35, 93–99 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2011.169
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2011.169
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Factors associated with 30-day readmission of patients with heart failure from a Japanese administrative database
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (2015)
-
Significance of estimated salt excretion as a possible predictor of the efficacy of concomitant angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and low-dose thiazide in patients with ARB resistance
Hypertension Research (2013)
-
Comparison of the effects of angiotensin II receptor antagonist monotherapy and combination therapy with a diuretic on cardiac function in spontaneously hypertensive rats
Journal of Echocardiography (2012)