Introduction

Genetic variation in xerophilous long-lived plants has rarely been examined and available estimates are considerably heterogeneous across species (Martinez-Palacios et al., 1999; Hamrick et al., 2001). In the Cactaceae, with close to 1600 recognized species (Gibson & Nobel, 1990), fewer than 15 taxa have been the subject of genetic diversity surveys (Nassar, 1999; Hamrick et al., 2001). Based on these studies, cacti can be described as having high levels of genetic diversity and relatively low population differentiation. These conclusions, however, are biased towards columnar cacti with predominantly outcrossing breeding systems and bat and bird pollination and seed dispersal.

For a more representative view of genetic diversity in cacti, species with contrasting life-history and ecological traits should be examined. Cacti with different mating and gene dispersal systems would be valuable subjects of study in this respect, because these two factors influence the distribution of genetic variation in seed plants (Loveless & Hamrick, 1984; Hamrick & Godt, 1989). In general, selfing and mixed-mating plant species have less genetic variation and more genetic differentiation among populations than outcrossing species. Although less predictive than mating systems, extensive pollen and seed dispersal are associated with high levels of within-population genetic diversity and low population subdivision.

Melocactus is one of the most distinctive and widely distributed genera of cacti, with 24 species ranging from Mexico to Brazil and Peru, including also part of the Caribbean (Taylor, 1991). This genus represents the most derived group within the Cereeae tribe, with a relatively reduced size (<30 cm), absence of branches, and a unique woolly apical cephalium containing the reproductive structures (Gibson & Nobel, 1990; Taylor, 1991). According to Taylor (1991), most species are self-compatible, but floral adaptations promote hummingbird-mediated cross-pollination. Hand pollination experiments conducted in Venezuela on M. curvispinus Pfeiffer demonstrated that this species can produce seeds by selfing (N. Ramírez, pers. comm.). Population-and family-level rates of outcrossing in this species were estimated by Nassar (1999) for a single Venezuelan population. For this population, the species behaved as a facultatively xenogamous species, with a mean outcrossing rate of 0.764 and a wide range of variation of individual rates of outcrossing (tm=0.18–1.00). Taylor (1991) also suggested that territorial behaviour in the hummingbirds that pollinate Melocactus species may further constrain gene flow. Together, selfing and potentially restricted gene dispersal in Melocactus species should promote less within-population genetic diversity and more genetic differentiation among populations than levels reported for predominantly outcrossing, long-distance dispersed columnar cacti sharing similar habitats and spatial ranges. We tested these predictions on M. curvispinus, a species broadly distributed in Venezuela that overlaps in range with other cacti for which data on allozyme diversity already exist (Nassar, 1999).

In this study we examined levels and patterns of allozyme genetic diversity in M. curvispinus across its entire range in Venezuela and compared these estimates with allozyme data available from other cacti with similar geographical ranges.

Materials and methods

Study system

Melocactus curvispinus, commonly known as ‘buche’ or ‘melon’, ranges from Mexico to northern South America, including part of the Caribbean. Two subspecies have been distinguished in Venezuela, M. curvispinus spp. curvispinus and M. curvispinus spp. caesius (Taylor, 1991). M. curvispinus spp. curvispinus is discontinuously distributed in the southwestern part of the country. M. curvispinus spp. caesius is distributed along the coast, from the Goajira Peninsula (west) to the Araya Peninsula and Margarita island (east). This species ranges from sea level to 1250 m and is always associated with arid and semiarid environments on a variety of soil types.

Melocactus curvispinus is a diploid cactus (2n=22; Das et al., 1998), easy to distinguish morphologically by its depressed-globose body, less than 30 cm tall at maturity. Adult plants develop a conspicuous cephalium, made of white woolly fibres intermixed with tightly clustered reddish bristles. Flowers are present only in the cephalium and are hermaphroditic and herkogamous, relatively small and solitary, with part of the floral tube exserted above the wool. Floral buds remain within the cephalium until less than 24 h before anthesis. The magenta flowers open during the afternoon and close by sunset on the same day. Few flowers (1–3) open simultaneously on the same individual. Episodic flowering occurs during most of the year; however, peak blooming and fruiting occurs during months with high precipitation (August–October) (J. Nassar, unpubl. data). This species is self-compatible (Taylor, 1991; Nassar, 1999; Ramírez, pers. comm.), however, several floral characteristics, including exerted stigma, bright colouration, and nectar production, suggest adaptations for outcrossing. Pollination is mainly performed by hummingbirds and, to a lesser extent, by solitary bees and butterflies (Taylor, 1991; J. Nassar, pers. observation). Fruits are chili-like berries, magenta or red and multiple-seeded. Seed dispersal occurs by lizards and birds (Taylor, 1991; Côrtes-Figueira et al., 1994). Individuals are solitary or occur in clusters. Population densities can be as high as 1290 individuals ha–1 (this study).

Study sites

This study was conducted in the main arid and semiarid zones of Venezuela (Fig. 1a), which include the coastline, islands and an extensive area along a North–South axis in the western part of the country. The latter includes extensive areas with xerophilous vegetation but also isolated xeric patches across the Venezuelan Andes.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Maps of Venezuela (a), Mainland region (b) and Peninsula region (c), showing locations where populations of Melocactus curvispinus were sampled. Names of locations and additional geographical information are included in Table 1. Shaded areas correspond to arid and semiarid lands (Sarmiento, 1976). The distribution of the species closely fits the distribution of arid lands in Venezuela.

Localities sampled, geographical coordinates, altitude and population density information are summarized in Table 1. Two spatial scales were considered: macrogeographical, including populations over all Venezuela (Fig. 1a), and regional, including populations within two geographically restricted areas, the Mainland region (Fig. 1b) and the Peninsula region (Fig. 1c). The Mainland region (9°49′–10°19′N and 69°28′–70°06′W) is located in the largest continuous extension of arid lands, in western Venezuela. The Peninsula region (11°56′– 11°58′N and 69°56′–70°01′W) corresponds to the Paraguaná Peninsula, in the northwestern coast. Each of these regions comprises an area approximately 56 × 70 km.

Table 1 Sampling localities of Melocactus curvispinus in Venezuela. Populations with prefix LAF3 correspond to the Mainland region and populations with prefix PAR correspond to the Peninsula region

Sampling and electrophoretic procedures

Eighteen populations were studied at the macrogeographical scale and five populations were selected from both the Mainland and Peninsula regions. Forty-eight individuals separated by at least 10 m were selected from each site. Viable seeds were obtained from one fruit per individual and stored in dry conditions. Seeds were germinated directly in trays with potting soil and kept indoors for two weeks before being placed in greenhouse facilities at the University of Georgia, Athens, GA, U.S.A. One seedling was used from each individual sampled from each population, for a total of 864 seedlings analysed.

One-cm tall seedlings were ground using sand, cold mortar and pestle. A PVP-phosphate extraction buffer (Wendel & Parks, 1982) was added to the tissue to solubilize and stabilize the enzymes. Chromatography paper wicks (Whatman 3 MM) were soaked with the protein extracts, placed into microtest plates and stored at −70°C prior to analysis. Horizontal electrophoresis was conducted on 11% potato starch gels (Sigma). Combinations of four buffer systems and 12 enzyme stains were used to resolve 19 putative loci: Buffer 4 with isocitrate dehydrogenase (Idh-1) and phosphoglucoisomerase (Pgi-1); buffer 8 with aspartate aminotransferase (Aat-1 and Aat-2), glutamate dehydrogenase (Gdh-1) and triose-phosphate isomerase (Tpi-1 and Tpi-2); buffer 11 with malate dehydrogenase (Mdh-1, Mdh-2 and Mdh-3), phosphoglucomutase (Pgm-1 and Pgm-2) and uridine diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase (Ugpp-1 and Ugpp-2); and buffer 34 with diaphorase (Dia-1 and Dia-2), fluorescent esterase (Fe-2), leucine aminopeptidase (Lap-1) and menadione reductase (Mnr-1). Recipes of buffers and stains are modified from Soltis et al. (1983) with the exception of buffer 34 (Mitton et al., 1979) and enzyme systems Aat and Dia (Cheliak & Pitel, 1984). Loci and alleles were designated based on relative protein mobility, with lower numbers assigned to those farther away from the origin.

Data analysis

Allele frequencies and standard genetic diversity parameters (Berg & Hamrick, 1997) were estimated at the species (subscript ‘s’), regional (Mainland and Peninsula regions, subscript ‘r’) and population (subscript ‘p’) levels, using the program LYNSPROG, written by M.D. Loveless (Department of Biology, College of Wooster, Wooster, OH) and A.F. Schnabel (Department of Biology, University of Indiana, South Bend, IN). The following parameters were estimated: proportion of polymorphic loci (P), mean number of alleles per locus (A) and per polymorphic locus (AP), observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected heterozygosity or genetic diversity (He=1 − ∑ pi2). These estimates were calculated for each locus and then averaged over all loci. Within-population estimates were averaged over all populations to obtain means and standard errors. In addition, the percentage of alleles per population relative to the total number of alleles scored for the species (% Al) was determined. Departures from Hardy–Weinberg expectations were examined for each polymorphic locus in each population using a probability test (exact H–W test; Rousset & Raymond, 1995). We tested for genotypic linkage disequilibrium between each pair of loci across all populations performing probability tests on contingency tables using a Markov chain method (Garnier-Gere & Dillman, 1992). Both tests were conducted with the program GENEPOP v.3.2a (Raymond & Rousset, 1995a).

Partitioning of genetic variation was performed at both macrogeographical and regional scales. In the former, we considered populations over the entire geographical range of the species in Venezuela (Fig. 1a). To ensure the macrogeographical dimension of the analysis, only one population was randomly chosen from the Mainland and Peninsula regions (one from each). For the regional scale, only populations within the Mainland and Peninsula regions were selected (Fig. 1b,c). Nei’s (1977) total genetic diversity (HT) and mean genetic diversity within populations (HS) were estimated for each polymorphic locus, using the program LYNSPROG. Allele frequency heterogeneity among populations was tested for polymorphic loci by conducting probability tests (Markov chain method; Raymond & Rousset, 1995b), using the program GENEPOP. F-statistics following Weir & Cockerham (1984) were estimated using the program FSTAT v.1.2, written by J. Goudet (I.Z.E.A., Switzerland). Overall means and standard errors of FIS and FST across loci were calculated in two ways: (a) as arithmetic means with their standard errors; and (b) as pooled estimates, weighting the contribution of each locus by the genetic diversity at each locus, and jackknifing over loci to generate the standard error. Significant differences from zero in the F-statistic estimates were tested using permutations for each locus (alleles within samples for FIS and multilocus genotypes among samples for FST).

Isolation by distance was tested using Rousset’s (1997) method, based on the computation of a linear regression of pairwise FST/(1 − FST) estimates to the natural logarithm of geographical distances between pairs of populations. The program GENEPOP was used for this test. A positive correlation between the two variables is indicative of isolation by distance. A Mantel test of association (10 000 permutations) between pairwise FST/(1 − FST) and ln of geographical distance matrices was used to test for significance of the isolation-by-distance pattern (Heywood, 1991).

Nei’s (1972) genetic identities (I) and distances (D) were estimated between all pairs of populations to generate average linkage clusterings using the unweighted pair group method with averaging (UPGMA) (Romesburg, 1984). Phenograms plotted using this procedure help to visualize genetic relationships between populations. UPGMA phenograms were performed using the program NTSYS-PC v.1.8 (Rohlf, 1993).

Results

Genetic diversity

Sixty-six alleles were resolved across all populations and loci. At the species level, 89.5% of loci were polymorphic (Table 2). The average number of alleles per locus was 3.53 (As) and per polymorphic locus (APs) was 3.82. The overall genetic diversity (Hes) was 0.145. Genetic diversity parameters were estimated separately for the Mainland and Peninsula regions. All genetic diversity estimates were higher in the Mainland region with the exception of Pr. In particular, the pooled expected heterozygosity (Her) varied from 0.093 in the Peninsula region to 0.157 in the Mainland region, however, population differences between the two regions were not statistically significant (Mann–Whitney test, U=6, NS). The average percentage of alleles captured in a given population (%Al) was 44%, and ranged from 38% (AND32 and LAF34) to 53% (ARA2). Mean within-population genetic diversity estimates were Pp= 45.3±3.0, Ap=1.54±0.04, APp=2.17±0.03, and Hep= 0.098±0.011. The major differences among populations were detected in levels of expected heterozygosity (Hep=0.037 for BUC1, Hep=0.195 for ARA2). No significant association was detected between population densities and Pp (Spearman’s rank correlation, r=−0.066, NS), Ap (r=−0.071, NS), APp (r=0.191, NS), and Hep (r=−0.175, NS). The highest levels of genetic diversity occurred on the eastern coast (ARA2, NUE1, NUE6) and part of the mid-western arid region (LAF31 and LAF32). In the northwestern territory (PAR- and LAF-populations), populations with high and low genetic diversity levels occurred in the same geographical units. Two geographically isolated populations, BUC1 in the central coast and AND32 in the frontier with Colombia, had levels of genetic variation comparatively lower than values found for other populations.

Table 2 Genetics diversity estimates at the species, region and population level for Melocactus curvispinus in Venezuela

Genetic structure

No significant linkage disequilibrium was detected for any of the 130 possible pairwise locus comparisons performed across all populations. Mean observed heterozygosities (Ho) were considerably lower than mean expected heterozygosities (Hep) for all populations, suggesting a deficiency of heterozygotes within populations throughout the species (Table 2). The highest heterozygote deficiencies were detected in Margarita island (NUE6), the Andean patch (AND32), Araya Peninsula (ARA2), and a population on the northwestern coast (LAF1). Fifty-six out of 112 (50%) fixation indices estimated for each polymorphic locus in each population were positive and significantly different from zero (P < 0.05). Seventy-five percent of polymorphic loci and 89% of populations had F-values significantly above zero (P < 0.05). Only populations BUC1 and GUA1, both in the central coast, did not have a deficit of heterozygotes. Wright’s (1978) mean within-population inbreeding coefficient (FIS) was positive and significantly different from zero at the macrogeographic scale (arithmetic mean FIS=0.385±0.077; weighted mean FIS=0.339±0.013; P < 0.001) and within the Mainland (arithmetic mean FIS=0.402± 0.087; weighted mean FIS=0.285±0.021; P < 0.001) and Peninsula regions (arithmetic mean FIS=0.194± 0.074; weighted mean FIS=0.301±0.031; P < 0.01) (Table 3). Overall, these results suggest that a moderate level of inbreeding and/or population substructuring occurs within these populations.

Table 3 Nei (1977) estimates of genetic diversity and Weir & Cockerham (1984) estimates of F-statistics for 17 polymorphic loci in Melocactus curvispinus at macrogeographic and regional (Mainland and Peninsula) scales. Arithmetic means and SE across loci are included

Significant allele frequency heterogeneity among populations was detected (P < 0.001) for 15 of 17 polymorphic loci (88.2%) at the macrogeographical scale, 10 out of 13 loci (77.0%) in the Mainland region and 11 out of 15 loci (73.3%) in the Peninsula region (Table 3). Twelve rare alleles were restricted to single populations, six alleles were circumscribed within Paraguaná Peninsula populations (PAR-), three alleles were only found in the northwestern area (LAF-), and three were restricted to the eastern coast (ARA2 and NUE-). FST estimates were heterogeneous across loci (Table 3). Most loci with relatively low FST values were monomorphic for most populations and had a common allele with frequencies above 0.90. At the macrogeographical level, the arithmetic mean FST was 0.193±0.047 and the weighted mean FST was 0.342±0.014 (P < 0.001), indicating that around 70% of the genetic diversity present in M. curvispinus is found within populations. Because only one population was randomly chosen from the Mainland and Peninsula regions, the estimate of FST represents only one outcome of the various possible combinations of populations that can be chosen from both regions. In order to determine the range of variation of FST estimates, mean values across loci were calculated for all possible combinations of populations at the macrogeographical level. Average FST estimates obtained across all combinations of populations were 0.195±0.004 (arithmetic mean) and 0.349±0.004 (weighted mean), very similar to the values obtained for a single combination of populations. At the regional level, the FST for the Mainland region (arithmetic mean FST=0.187±0.059; weighted mean FST=0.324±0.022; P < 0.001) was higher than the value for the Peninsula region (arithmetic mean FST=0.084±0.036; weighted mean FST=0.150 ± 0.021; P < 0.01), suggesting more population differentiation in the former region; however, differences between regional estimates were not statistically significant (95% C.I. based on bootstrapping over loci).

A weak pattern of isolation-by-distance was detected when all the populations were included in the linear regression analysis of FST/(1 − FST) on natural log of geographical distance (Fig. 2). The regression coefficient was relatively low and positive (b=0.107; 95% C.I.=0.053, 0.157) and the regression line explained only 10% of the variation in the data; however, the association between pairwise ln geographical distances and pairwise FST/(1 − FST) values was significant (Mantel test, r=0.30, one-tailed P=0.02).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Differentiation among Melocactus curvispinus populations. Multilocus estimates of pairwise differentiation (FST/(1 − FST)) are plotted against natural logarithm of geographical distances (in km) according to Rousset (1997). R2=0.100.

Nei’s (1972) genetic identities (I) and distances (D) were estimated between population pairs across Venezuela (data not shown). Identity values varied from 0.824 to 0.998 (mean=0.942 ± 0.003). The lowest genetic identities were mostly associated with population pairs including entities that belonged to the Mainland region (LAF3-) and population GUA1 on the central coast. The UPGMA phenogram partially matched geographical relationships among populations (Fig. 3). The most meaningful cluster in geographical terms separated all populations in the east coast (BUC1, ARA2 and NUE-) from the remaining entities. A second cluster grouped most elements of western Venezuela, from Paraguaná Peninsula (PAR-) to Ureña (AND32). Grouping inside of this cluster, however, was not concordant with geographical distances that separate most populations.

Fig. 3
figure 3

UPGMA clustering based on Nei’s genetic distances (D) estimated for 18 populations of Melocactus curvispinus. Populations were sampled across the geographical distribution in Venezuela.

Discussion

Genetic diversity

Compared to other flowering plant species, M. curvispinus is relatively rich in polymorphic loci (P) and number of alleles per polymorphic locus (AP), but with only average levels of heterozygosity (He) (Table 4) (Hamrick & Godt, 1989; Hamrick et al., 1992). Many of the polymorphic loci surveyed had one allele in high frequency, a pattern that has been detected in other cactus species (Nassar, 1999; Hamrick et al., 2001). Compared to long-lived woody species with mixed-animal breeding systems, M. curvispinus has at least twice the genetic diversity at both the species and population levels (Hamrick et al., 1992). Besides M. curvispinus, eight other cactus species have been surveyed for allozyme diversity under similar protocols and across several populations (Nassar, 1999; Hamrick et al., in press) (Table 4). Compared to them, M. curvispinus exhibited similar values of Ps, As and APs, but showed relatively lower heterozygosity at the species and population levels. The results found for M. curvispinus are consistent with the general observation that mixed-mating taxa tend to have less genetic diversity than predominantly outcrossing plants (Hamrick & Godt, 1989; Hamrick et al., 1992). All the other cacti studied, with the exception of hermaphroditic individuals of the Mexican-American P. pringlei (Murawski et al., 1994) and Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri in Peru (Sahley, 1996), are obligate outcrossers (Leuenberger, 1986; Fleming et al., 1996; Nassar et al., 1997; Nassar, 1999).

Table 4 Allozyme diversity estimates for Melocactus curvispinus, other species of cactus, long-lived woody taxa, and all plant species. Estimates are at the species level

Populations with the highest levels of genetic variation were distributed in two zones in Venezuela, the mid-western arid region and the coastal zone in the east. Interestingly, some populations within the former area (LAF34 and LAF35) had substantially less genetic diversity than other nearby populations. Compared to others in the region, these two populations are located within highly disturbed agricultural areas. Populations in such disturbed environments may have passed through genetic bottlenecks, and the disturbances may have produced physical barriers that reduced gene exchange among populations. Populations BUC1 in the central coast and AND32 in the Andes had the lowest levels of genetic diversity. Both localities represent geographically isolated populations of M. curvispinus, in which genetic drift might have reduced genetic variability. In contrast, a relatively restricted arid zone on the eastern coast of Venezuela (NUE-and ARA2) contained high levels of genetic variation. The expectations for this zone were contrary to the pattern observed, since the species’ range in that part of the country is relatively narrow. However, during the last Glacial Maximum (18 000 yr BP), when the general climate in Venezuela was drier than at present (Schubert, 1988) the area covered by arid vegetation in the eastern part of the country was probably broader, maintaining larger and, apparently, genetically diverse populations.

Levels of genetic diversity were only slightly higher for the Mainland compared to the Peninsula region. In a similar study comparing Pereskia guamacho populations between these two areas (Nassar, 1999), populations in the Mainland region had significantly more genetic diversity than in the Peninsula. It is tempting to attribute the observed patterns to the greater spatial isolation of cactus populations on the peninsula with respect to the mainland, but the two populations of Melocactus surveyed in Margarita island had higher or equivalent levels of genetic diversity to all populations examined in the Peninsula region. However, the Margarita island populations are relatively dense (198–483 ind/ha) and continuously distributed along the coast and lowlands.

Genetic structure

A deficiency of heterozygotes was observed in most populations, reflecting the mixed-mating system (tm=0.764 for population LAF32) of M. curvispinus (Nassar, 1999). Inbreeding through selfing may play a significant role in the genetic make-up of this species. In addition, part of the heterozygote deficiency observed within populations could also be the product of population substructuring (Heywood, 1991). Hummingbirds are important pollinators of Melocactus flowers (Taylor, 1991). Many hummingbird species defend well-defined patches of flowers (territories) from other heterospecific and conspecific floral visitors (Calder, 1990). It is possible that during peak flowering M. curvispinus becomes suitable for territorial defense by hummingbirds. This is the case for Melocactus salvadorensis, a species pollinated by the Ruby-Topaz hummingbird (Chrysolampis mosquitus) in the dry caatinga of northeastern Brazil (Raw, 1996). That foraging strategy, coupled with local seed dispersal, could generate genetic subdivision and small neighbourhood sizes and areas within Melocactus populations (Turner et al., 1982). Lizards, which are important seed dispersers of this genus (Taylor, 1991; Côrtes-Figueira et al., 1994), generally have limited dispersal abilities (Rose, 1982), therefore contributing to both increased inbreeding and genetic subdivision within the Melocactus populations.

Significant genetic differentiation among populations of M. curvispinus was detected both at the macrogeographical and at the regional levels. Mean FST values were similar between the macrogeographic range (0.193±0.047) and the Mainland subset (0.187± 0.059). The Peninsula region had less genetic differentiation among populations (0.084±0.036). This regional difference can be explained in part by a more uniform and flattened landscape in the Paraguaná Peninsula compared to the Mainland region, that could facilitate genetic exchange among populations. Overall, these results suggest that historically, M. curvispinus has had moderate to low levels of gene flow across its geographical distribution in Venezuela.

Melocactus curvispinus had significantly more interpopulation differentiation than average values reported for 191 long-lived woody species (GST=0.084) (Table 4), 37 animal-pollinated woody plants (GST= 0.099), 12 animal-pollinated mixed-mating species (GST=0.122), and 14 taxa with animal-ingested seed dispersal (GST=0.051) (Hamrick et al., 1992). This species also had comparatively higher FST values than most cacti studied (N=8) over similar geographical areas (mean GST=0.112, mean; Table 4) (Nassar, 1999; Hamrick et al., 2001). As indicated previously, most of those cacti are predominantly outcrossing. In general, selfing and mixed-mating plants have more genetic differentiation among populations than outcrossing plant taxa (Hamrick & Godt, 1989, 1996). As stated before, restricted pollination and seed dispersal can also significantly increase population structure (Turner et al., 1982). Lophocereus schottii, a self-incompatible, moth-pollinated columnar cactus (Fleming & Holland, 1998), had more population differentiation than other outcrossing columnar cacti examined in Mexico, southwestern USA and Venezuela (GST=0.242) (Hamrick et al., in press). This species and M. curvispinus have in common pollen vectors with apparently restricted dispersal abilities. Although small moths can perform long-distance flights, most pollination events by these insects seem to occur over relatively short distances (Pellmyr et al., 1997). In the case of M. curvispinus, its hummingbird pollinators might have a relatively small foraging area if they defend a floral resource during the peak flowering period. Taylor (1991) has suggested previously that restricted hummingbird foraging could lead to genetic isolation among melocacti populations; our data appear to support his hypothesis.

Our test for isolation-by-distance (Rousset, 1997) indicated a weak but significant relationship between levels of genetic exchange and geographical distances separating Melocactus populations. Theoretically, the absence of isolation-by-distance could be indicative of randomized gene dispersal (island model). In the case of M. curvispinus, however, it is more plausible to interpret the pattern observed as evidence of effective population isolation (Slatkin, 1993). The moderate FST value observed for M. curvispinus suggests that gene movement among populations may be relatively limited and that genetic drift may play a significant role in the spatial genetic structuring of this species.

Nei’s (1972) genetic identity values were relatively high for most population pairs (mean I=0.942) and within the range attributed to conspecific populations (Crawford, 1989). This result is in agreement with Taylor’s (1991) proposition of a single species of M. curvispinus including all populations of this cactus in Venezuela. At the level of resolution that allozyme variation allows, four genetically related groups of populations can be separated: (i) a well-delimited cluster in the east coast (BUC1, NUE-, ARA2); (ii) an isolated element in the central coast (GUA); (iii) a large cluster embracing populations from the Paraguaná Peninsula to the frontier with Colombia (PAR-, LAF3-, LAF21, LAF1 and AND32); and (iv) a subgroup conformed by two populations (LAF31 and LAF32) belonging to the mid-western region. This pattern, however, does not reflect Taylor’s (1991) taxonomic subdivision of M. curvispinus in Venezuela. According to Taylor, M. curvispinus curvispinus ranges from Ureña, on the Colombian border, to mid-western Venezuela. The other subspecies, M. curvispinus caesius, is found mostly along the coast. Even though Crawford (1989) has stated that infraspecific subdivisions of taxa are not necessarily reflected by patterns of allozyme variation, the results of this study call for a reconsideration of the taxonomic subdivision of this species in Venezuela.

Overall, the present results suggest that in M. curvispinus, the combination of mixed-mating and restricted animal-mediated gene dispersal, have led to higher genetic heterogeneity among populations and somewhat lower within-population genetic variation than levels observed in other cactus species with more extensive gene dispersal. Melocactus curvispinus therefore represents a moderately genetically structured species that may potentially be more exposed to speciation processes than Venezuelan cacti with obligate xenogamy and extensive gene dispersal. In Central and South America, the genus Melocactus includes 24 species and 10 heterotypic subspecies (Taylor, 1991). While other genera, such as Stenocereus, Pilosocereus and Pereskia, are represented in Venezuela by only one or two species (Hunt, 1999), five species of Melocactus have been identified. Furthermore, within M. curvispinus, three subspecies and two varieties of one subspecies have been recognized. Although the results of this study do not negate the infraspecific subdivision proposed for Venezuela, they should stimulate a revision of the geographical ranges associated with each subspecies.