Original Article

Heredity (1992) 68, 537–546; doi:10.1038/hdy.1992.76

Evolution of reproductive systems in filamentous ascomycetes. II. Evolution of hermaphroditism and other reproductive strategies

M J Nauta1 and R F Hoekstra1

1Department of Genetics, Agricultural University, Dreyenlaan 2, 6703 HA Wageningen, The Netherlands

Received 25 June 1991.

Top

Abstract

The evolution of different reproductive systems in filamentous ascomycetes is studied in a population genetic model. These fungi differ essentially from higher plants and animals because mating types can exist in addition to male and female gametes, and the conidia serve as both male gametes and asexual spores; moreover, selfing is genetically equivalent to asexual reproduction in these haploid organisms. A variable fitness of ascospore production is predicted as the explanation for the evolution of two systems that abundantly exist in nature: hermaphroditism in heterothallic species and the formation of both asexual and sexual spores in homothallic species. Imperfect fungi will evolve if sexual spores do not show a remarkably higher fitness than asexual spores.

Keywords:

ascomycetes, dioecy, evolution, hermaphroditism, reproduction

Top

References

  1. Ainsworth, G C. 1973. Introduction and keys to higher taxa. In: Ainsworth, G. C., Sparrow, F. K. and Sussman, A. S. (eds), The Fungi An Advanced Treatise, Volume IVa, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–7.
  2. Charlesworth, B, and Charlesworth, D. 1978a. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am Nat, 112, 975–997. | Article | ISI |
  3. Charlesworth, D, and Charlesworth, B. 1978b. Population genetics of partial male-sterility and the evolution of monoecy and dioecy. Heredity, 41, 137–153.
  4. Charlesworth, D, and Ganders, F R. 1979. The population genetics of gynodioecy with cytoplasmic-genic male-sterility. Heredity, 43, 213–218.
  5. Charnov, E L, Maynard Smith, J, and Bull, J J. 1976. Why be an hermaphrodite? Nature, 263, 125–126. | Article | ISI |
  6. Gregorius, H-R, Ross, M D, and Gillet, E M. 1982. Selection in plant populations of effectively infinite size. III. The maintenance of females among hermaphrodites for a biallelic model. Heredity, 48, 329–343.
  7. Gregorius, H-R, Ross, M D, and Gillet, E M. 1983. Selection in plant populations of effectively infinite size. V. Biallelic models of trioecy. Genetics, 103, 529–544.
  8. Lewis, W M. Jr. 1987. The cost of sex. In: Stearns, S. C. (ed.), The Evolution of Sex and its Consequences. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp. 33–57.
  9. Maynard Smith, J. 1971. The origin and maintenance of sex. In: Williams, G. C. (ed.), Group Selection. Chicago, Aldine-Atherton, pp. 163–175.
  10. Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  11. Nauta, M J, and Hoekstra, R F. 1992. Evolution of reproductive systems in filamentous ascomycetes. I. Evolution of mating types. Heredity, 68, 405–410.
  12. Perkins, D D, and Turner, B C. 1988. Neurospora from natural populations: Towards the population biology of a haploid eukaryote. Exp Mycol, 12, 91–131.
  13. Ross, M D. 1982. Evolutionary pathways to subdioecy. Am Nat, 119, 297–318. | Article |
  14. Venable, D L, and Brown, J S. 1988. The selective interactions of dispersal, dormancy and seed size as adaptations for reducing risk in variable environments. Am Nat, 131, 360–384. | Article |

Extra navigation

.

natureproducts


ADVERTISEMENT