Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

Imprecise methods may both obscure and aggravate a relation between fat and breast cancer

Abstract

Bias in diet reporting may be both random and non-random, and may be found with simpler as well as more advanced dietary instruments. A random bias will contribute to obscure relations between diet and disease. A systematic bias may obscure or aggravate such associations. Underreporting of non-protein energy has been found to be substantial, particularly among those who are obese or have high dietary intakes. Such a non-random bias on the group level would tend to aggravate associations between dietary non-protein and disease. Whether the net result of the random and non-random bias aggravates or obscures relations depends on the relative magnitude of the two.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bingham SA, Luben R, Weich A, Wareham N, Khaw KT, Day N (2003). Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast cancer? Lancet 362, 212–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goris AH, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Westerterp KR (2000). Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obse men: selective underreporting of fat intake. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 130–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goris AHC, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Westerterp KR (2000). Undereating and underrecording of habituel food intake in obese men: selective underreporting of fat intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 71, 130–134.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heitmann BL, Lissner L (1995). Dietary underreporting by obese individuals – is it specific or non-specific? BMJ 311, 986–989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heitmann BL, Lissner L (2005). Can adverse effects of dietary fat intake be overestimated as a consequence of dietary fat underreporting? Pub Health Nutr 8, 1322–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppitt Sd, Swann D, Black AE, Prentice AM (1998). Assessment of selective under-reporting of food intake by both obese and non-obese women in a metabolic facility. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22, 303–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The MONICA study was funded by The Danish Medical Research Council. The funding sources had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B L Heitmann.

Additional information

Contributors: Idea, writing and research letter manuscript developed jointly between Professor BLH and statistician PF. Statistician CH is thanked for his constructive comments to the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heitmann, B., Frederiksen, P. Imprecise methods may both obscure and aggravate a relation between fat and breast cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 925–927 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602589

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602589

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links