Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

How can a proposed Cochrane diet and nutrition field work effectively?

Abstract

The Cochrane Database currently provides relatively little evidence-based guidance about nutrition relevant to general practitioners. This situation could be improved by the establishment of a new Cochrane Field to identify relevant studies, prioritize topics to include nutrition, work with Cochrane methodologists on the inclusion of observational studies, and disseminate results of Cochrane reviews to general practitioners and their patients.

A Diet and Nutrition Field could be established as a separate entity or as a Subgroup of the existing Primary Health Care (PHC) Field. The Field would be appropriate if the intent is to immediately cover nutritional interventions of all sorts, in all settings. However, if the focus is nutritional evidence for use by primary care clinicians, organization as a subField would provide a simpler registration process, allow Cochrane activities to begin sooner, and would allow members to focus on primary-care-relevant nutritional issues, conserving their resources and energy. A mechanism exists for conversion to a freestanding Field if the scope later expands.

Of the core Field functions, identification and assembly of relevant trials into a specialized register would be among the most important. Special registers are generated by focused literature searches augmented by hand-searching of key journals. Given the importance of studies with observational designs, a nutrition field register will require some additional work on search strategies and inclusion criteria.

Other key functions would include ensuring effective communication both with members of other Cochrane entities and with the scientific and clinical community with interests in diet and nutrition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cochrane Manual Page 128– http://www.cochrane.org/admin/manual.htm

  2. Module of the Cochrane Nonrandomised Studies Group - http://www.cochrane.dk/nrsmg/module.htm

  3. Cochrane Cancer Network Web Site http://www.canet.org/

References

  • van Binsbergen JJ, Delaney BC & van Weel C (2003): Nutrition in primary care: scope and relevance of output from the Cochrane Collaboration. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77 (Suppl), 1083S–1088S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L A Becker.

Additional information

Guarantor: J van Binsbergen.

Contributors: L Becker wrote the initial and final drafts of the paper and will serve as Guarantor. J van Binsbergen wrote the first draft of the introduction and provided editorial comments and suggested revisions throughout the process.

Conflict of interest statement: We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Becker, L., van Binsbergen, J. How can a proposed Cochrane diet and nutrition field work effectively?. Eur J Clin Nutr 59 (Suppl 1), S167–S171 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602192

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602192

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links