Original Communication
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2003) 57, 674–680. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601597
Dietary calcium intake in premenopausal Bangladeshi women: do socio-economic or physiological factors play a role?
M Z Islam1, C Lamberg-Allardt1, M Kärkkäinen1 and S M K Ali2
- 1Division of Nutrition, Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- 2Institute of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Correspondence: C Lamberg-Allardt, Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology, Division of Nutrition, Calcium Research Unit, PO Box 27, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: christel.lamberg-allardt@helsinki.fi
Guarantor: MZ Islam.
Contributors: MZI and CL-A were involved in planning the study. MZI was the principal investigator of the study and he carried out the field study together with field workers. He thoroughly checked the measured and coded food items by himself and carried out the statistical analysis together with MK and CL-A. He prepared the first draft and final version of the manuscript together with CL-A. SMKA provided proper guidance with expertise during field work of this study.
Accepted 19 July 2002.
Abstract
Objective: Evaluation of data on dietary calcium intake in premenopausal women of two socio-economic groups in Bangladesh.
Design: A cross sectional study. Three days dietary records were used to estimate habitual calcium intake.
Setting: Two regions of Bangladesh. The Dhaka city area and the Betagair Union in the sub-district Nandail, Mymensingh.
Subjects: A total of 191 subjects of two groups (low socio-economic group=group L, n=101 and high socio-economic group=group H, n=90) of Bangladeshi women aged 16–40 y. About 87% of the subjects were housewives and the rest 13% were distributed in other different professions. Each group consisted of three sub-groups (non-pregnant non-lactating=1, pregnant=2 and lactating=3).
Results: The influence of socio-economic status on dietary intake of calcium (P<0.001) was observed in this study. The dietary intake of calcium was influenced by physiological status (PS) in high income group only (P<0.005). The mean dietary calcium intake was significantly higher (P<0.005) in all sub-groups of this group compared with the corresponding sub-groups in low income group. Although in group H, 47% of subjects failed to meet even the lowest level (400–500 mg/day) of WHO recommended dietary allowances (RDA) of calcium for adult women. No subject in group L was found to meet the RDA level. Moreover, 63% of the women in group L had calcium intake lower than 200 mg/day. These figure could be more critical in both groups if we consider the recent USA-RDAs of calcium for adult women (1000 mg/day). The observed sources of dietary calcium were different in the two groups.
Conclusions: The results of the study suggested that low calcium intake could reduce the bone accretion rates and increase the risk of osteoporosis in the subjects of the present study. Calcium rich food may be recommended for women in both groups.
Sponsorship: The study was supported by the Academy of Finland, University of Helsinki and NorFa, Norway.
Keywords:
Bangladesh, calcium intake, socio-economic groups, premenopausal women
