Commentary

Dental caries is a common problem in preschool children that may lead to dental pain and subsequent restorative intervention or extraction of deciduous teeth. Adopting preventive measures could decrease the incidence of dental caries. Of these preventive measures, fluoride toothpaste is considered to possess an anti-caries potential. This review aims to discover the anti-caries potential of fluoride toothpaste on preschool children.

A comprehensive search was performed including four trial registries, six electronic databases, meeting abstracts of two organisations, checking reference lists of eligible trials, email correspondence with field specialists and finally hand searching of 16 dentistry journals.

Randomised and quasi-randomised studies were included, excluding those with follow-up shorter than one year. Study selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Disagreements were resolved by consensus after consulting a third examiner. The search strategy resulted in 159 studies, of which eight studies were included.

A reference list of excluded studies was not provided either in the article nor in online appendices. Quality of included studies was determined using Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool, while publication bias was not assessed.

Fluoride concentration in included studies was divided into low (440 to 500 ppm) and standard (1000 to 1500 ppm). Three outcomes were assessed; dmfs caries increment, dmft caries increment and proportion of children developing caries. Meta-analysis of the third outcome shows that standard fluoride toothpaste reduces caries potential in preschool children by 14% compared to no intervention. Meanwhile, low fluoride toothpaste resulted in a non-statistically significant pooled estimate. Therefore, the authors recommend the use of standard fluoride toothpaste in preschool children.

The authors' recommendation should be considered with caution. First, three out of eight included studies performed adequate sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding while the five remaining studies showed a high risk of bias.

Nevertheless, all eight studies were included in the meta-analysis, which poses a threat on the validity of the final pooled estimate. Second, this systematic review discussed the effectiveness of different fluoride toothpaste concentrations, while disregarding their potential adverse effect namely ‘dental fluorosis’.

A recent systematic review showed a tendency for decreased fluorosis when using fluoride toothpaste with lower concentration.1 Therefore, the search should continue to discover the optimum fluoride concentration with maximum anti-caries benefit and minimal fluorosis potential.