Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Maternal and neonatal characteristics of extremely low birth weight infants who die in the first day of life

Journal of Perinatology volume 29, pages 33–38 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

To determine changes over time in the characteristics of early extremely low birth weight non-survivors (E-ELBW-NS), maternal characteristics and perinatal management, and the documentation of perinatal consultations.

Study Design:

We conducted a chart review of infants <750 g who died within 24 h divided into two epochs: 1 January 1995 to 31 December 1999 and 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2005. Maternal and neonatal characteristics, delivery room resuscitation, post-resuscitation care, and documentation of resuscitation and perinatal counseling were examined.

Result:

A total of 138 infants met inclusion criteria. During Epoch 2, there was an increase in black, small for gestational age infants and prior maternal preterm delivery, and decreased incidences of tocolysis and chorioamnionitis. Also, a trend toward more hemolysis elevated liver enzymes and low platelet syndrome and decreased prenatal care existed. Perinatal consultations increased in both number and quality with time.

Conclusion:

There has been a shift in racial distribution toward more black infants in the second epoch perhaps reflecting disparities in care. Otherwise, demographics and management of E-ELBW-NS have changed minimally. There has been a significant improvement in the documentation of perinatal consultations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meadow W, Lee G, Lin K, Lantos J . Changes in mortality for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990s: implications for treatment decisions and resource use. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 1223–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W, Korones SB, Papile LA, Stoll BJ et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996. Pediatrics 2001; 107: e1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan K, Ohlsson A, Synnes A, Lee DS, Chien LY, Lee SK et al. Survival, morbidity, and resource use of infants of 25 weeks' gestational age or less. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 220–226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fanaroff AA, Hack M, Walsh MC . The NICHD neonatal research network: changes in practice and outcomes during the first 15 years. Semin Perinatol 2003; 27: 281–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Doyle LW, the Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Evaluation of neonatal intensive care for extremely low birth weight infants in Victoria over two decades: I. Effectiveness. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 505–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Warner B, Musial MJ, Chenier T, Donovan E . The effect of birth hospital type on the outcome of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Costeloe K, Hennessy E, Gibson AT, Marlow N, Wilkinson AR, the EPICure Study Group. The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 659–671.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucey JF, Rowan CA, Shiono P, Wilkinson AR, Kilpatrick S, Payne NR et al. Fetal infants: the fate of 4172 infants with birth weights of 401–500 g—the Vermont Oxford Network experience (1996–2000). Pediatrics 2004; 113: 1559–1566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fanaroff AA, Stoll BJ, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, Stark AR et al. NICHD Neonatal Research Network: trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for low birth weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 147.e1–147.e8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tommiska V, Heinonen K, Lehtonen L, Renlund M, Saarela T, Tammela O et al. No improvement in outcome of nationwide extremely low birth weight infant populations between 1996–1997 and 1999–2000. J Pediatr 2007; 119: 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Obstetric Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 1995; 96: 974–976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper WO, Hickson GB, Mitchel EF, Ray WA . Comparison of perinatal outcomes among TennCare Managed Care Organizations. Pediatrics 1999; 104: 525–529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kistka ZA-F, Palomar L, Lee KA, Boslaugh SA, Wangler MF, Cole FS et al. Racial disparity in the frequency of recurrence of preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 131.e1–131.e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kramer MS, Goulet L, Lydon J, Seguin J, McNamara H, Dassa C et al. Socio-economic disparities in preterm birth: causal pathways and mechanisms. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001; 15 (Suppl 2): 104–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paul DA, Locke R, Zook K, Leef KH, Stefano JL, Colmorgen G . Racial differences in prenatal care of mothers delivering very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2006; 26: 74–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Healy AJ, Malone FD, Sullivan LM, Porter TF, Luthy DA, Comstock DH et al. Early access to prenatal care. Implications for racial disparity in perinatal mortality. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 625–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamilton BE, Minino AM, Martin JA, Kochanek KD, Strobino DM, Guyer B . Annual summary of vital statistics: 2005. Pediatrics 2007; 119: 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. National Center for Health Statistics, final natality data. http://www.cdc.gov/nehs/births.htm accessed August 1, 2008.

  19. Tyson JE, Younes N, Verter J, Wright LL . Viability, morbidity, and resource use among newborns of 501 to 800-g birth weight. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. JAMA 1996; 276: 1645–1651.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh J, Lantos J, Meadow W . End-of-life after birth: death and dying in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 1620–1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Noninitiation or withdrawal of intensive care for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics 2007; 119: 401–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology practice bulletin no. 38: perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 617–624.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Janvier A, Barrington KJ . The ethics of neonatal resuscitation at the margins of viability: informed consent and outcomes. J Pediatr 2005; 147: 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peerzada JM, Richardson DK, Burns JP . Delivery room decision-making at the threshold of viability. J Pediatr 2004; 145: 492–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mercurio MR . Physicians refusal to resuscitate at borderline gestational age. J Perinatol 2005; 25: 685–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cummings B, McKay K, Hussain N . Neonatologists' opinions regarding resuscitation of extremely premature infants in Connecticut and Rhode Island. CT Med 2002; 66: 733–738.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paris JJ, Schreiber MD, Reardon F . The ‘emergent circumstances’ exception to the need for consent: the Texas Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. HCA. J Perinatol 2004; 24: 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leuthner SR . Decisions regarding resuscitation of the extremely premature infant and models of best interest. J Perinatol 2001; 21: 193–198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Koh THHG, Butow PN, Coory M, Budge D, Collie LA, Whitehall J et al. Provision of taped conversations with neonatologists to mothers of babies in intensive care: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2007; 334: 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Koh THHG, Budge D, Butow P, Renison B, Woodgate P . Audio recordings of consultations with doctors for parents of critically sick babies. Cochrane Libr 2007; 1: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

    M M Pont & B S Carter

Authors
  1. M M Pont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B S Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B S Carter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pont, M., Carter, B. Maternal and neonatal characteristics of extremely low birth weight infants who die in the first day of life. J Perinatol 29, 33–38 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.112

Keywords

Search

Advanced search

Quick links