Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

The EBMT risk score

Abstract

The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) risk score provides a simple tool to assess instantly chances and risks of hematopoietic SCT(HSCT) for an individual patient pre-transplant. Five factors, age of the patient, stage of the disease, time from diagnosis, donor type and donor recipient gender combination augment risk for an individual patient with increasing score from 0 as best to 7 as worst in an additive way. The score holds for all acquired hematological disorders, for allogeneic and autologous HSCT (score 0–5), is independent of the HSCT technology and is valid for standard or reduced intensity conditioning. Survival is uniformly worse for older patients, transplanted in advanced disease stage after a long-time interval and with a mismatched donor than for younger patients, transplanted soon in early stage with a well matched donor. Additional risk factors such as performance score, CMV serostatus or cytokine polymorphisms improve prediction but to different extents for low or high-risk patients. Comparative assessment of disease risk and global pre-transplant risk should guide decisions for each patient with his/her specific disease between HSCT and a non-transplant approach and replace the traditional ‘donor vs no donor’ with such a risk-adapted individualized strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gratwohl A, Hermans J, Goldman JM, Arcese W, Carreras E, Devergie A et al. Risk assessment for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia before allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation. Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Lancet 1998; 352: 1087–1092.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gratwohl A, Passweg J, Baldomero H, Hermans J, Urbano-Ispizua A . Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Europe 1998. Hematol J 2000; 1: 333–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Armitage JO . Bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 827–838.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas ED, Storb R, Clift RA, Fefer A, Johnson L, Neiman PE et al. Bone-marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med 1975; 292: 895–902.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sierra J, Storer B, Hansen JA, Bjerke JW, Martin PJ, Petersdorf EW et al. Transplantation of marrow cells from unrelated donors for treatment of high-risk acute leukemia: the effect of leukemic burden, donor HLA-matching, and marrow cell dose. Blood 1997; 89: 4226–4235.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goulmy E, Termijtelen A, Bradley BA, van Rood JJ . Alloimmunity to human H-Y. Lancet 1976; 2: 1206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for leukaemia in Europe. Report from the Working Party on Leukaemia. Lancet 1988; 1: 1379–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gratwohl A . Biological differences in the three major leukaemias. Lancet 1988; 2: 403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Silver RT, Woolf SH, Hehlmann R, Appelbaum FR, Anderson J, Bennett C et al. An evidence-based analysis of the effect of busulfan, hydroxyurea, interferon, and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in treating the chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia: developed for the American Society of Hematology. Blood 1999; 94: 1517–1536.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Passweg JR, Walker I, Sobocinski KA, Klein JP, Horowitz MM, Giralt SA . Validation and extension of the EBMT Risk Score for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) receiving allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplants. Br J Haematol 2004; 125: 613–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Souza CA, Vigorito AC, Ruiz MA, Nucci M, Dulley FL, Funcke V et al. Validation of the EBMT risk score in chronic myeloid leukemia in Brazil and allogeneic transplant outcome. Haematologica 2005; 90: 232–237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gratwohl A, Brand R, Apperley J, Crawley C, Ruutu T, Corradini P et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia in Europe 2006: transplant activity, long-term data and current results. An analysis by the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Haematologica 2006; 91: 513–521.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crawley C, Szydlo R, Lalancette M, Bacigalupo A, Lange A, Brune M et al. Outcomes of reduced-intensity transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis of prognostic factors from the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. Blood 2005; 106: 2969–2976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Craddock C, Szydlo RM, Dazzi F, Olavarria E, Cwynarski K, Yong A et al. Cytomegalovirus seropositivity adversely influences outcome after T-depleted unrelated donor transplant in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: the case for tailored graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Br J Haematol 2001; 112: 228–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saussele S, Lauseker M, Gratwohl A, Beelen DW, Bunjes D, Schwerdtfeger R et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo SCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era: evaluation of its impact within a subgroup of the randomized German CML Study IV. Blood 2010; 115: 1880–1885.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cassileth PA, Harrington DP, Appelbaum FR, Lazarus HM, Rowe JM, Paietta E et al. Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1649–1656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gahrton G . Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: impact of donor-recipient sex combination in allogeneic transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2007; 20: 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van Besien K . Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in follicular lymphoma: recent progress and controversy. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2009, 610–618.

  19. Kröger N, Brand R, van Biezen A, Zander A, Dierlamm J, Niederwieser D et al. Risk factors for therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica 2009; 94: 542–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta V, Eapen M, Brazauskas R, Carreras J, Aljurf M, Gale RP et al. Impact of age on outcomes after bone marrow transplantation for acquired aplastic anemia using HLA-matched sibling donors. Haematologica 2010; 95: 2119–2125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gratwohl A, Stern M, Brand R, Apperley J, Baldomero H, de Witte T et al. Risk score for outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective analysis. Cancer 2009; 115: 4715–4726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gratwohl A, Brand R, Niederwieser D, Baldomero H, Chabannon C, Cornelissen J et al. Introduction of a quality management system and outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2010 (e-pub ahead of print 11 April 2011).

  23. Löwenberg B, Downing JR, Burnett A . Acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1051–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zwaan FE, Hermans J, Barrett AJ, Speck B . Bone marrow transplantation for acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia: a survey of the European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Br J Haematol 1984; 56: 645–653.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shaw BE, Arguello R, Garcia-Sepulveda CA, Madrigal JA . The impact of HLA genotyping on survival following unrelated donor haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 2010; 150: 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Petersdorf EW . Optimal HLA matching in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Curr Opin Immunol 2008; 20: 588–593.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chalandon Y, Tiercy JM, Schanz U, Gungor T, Seger R, Halter J et al. Impact of high-resolution matching in allogeneic unrelated donor stem cell transplantation in Switzerland. BMT 2006; 37: 909–916.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schlenk RF, Döhner K, Mack S, Stoppel M, Király F, Götze K et al. Prospective evaluation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation from matched related and matched unrelated donors in younger adults with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: German-Austrian trial AMLHD98A. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 4642–4648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stern M, Brand R, de Witte T, Sureda A, Rocha V, Passweg J et al. Female-versus-male alloreactivity as a model for minor histocompatibility antigens in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 2149–2157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Spierings E, Vermeulen CJ, Vogt MH, Doerner LE, Falkenburg JH, Mutis T et al. Identification of HLA class II-restricted H-Y-specific T-helper epitope evoking CD4+ T-helper cells in H-Y-mismatched transplantation. Lancet 2003; 362: 610–615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Miklos DB, Kim HT, Miller KH, Guo L, Zorn E, Lee SJ et al. Antibody responses to H-Y minor histocompatibility antigens correlate with chronic graft-versus-host disease and disease remission. Blood 2005; 105: 2973–2978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gratwohl A, Döhler B, Stern M, Opelz G . H-Y as a minor histocompatibility antigen in kidney transplantation: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2008; 372: 49–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ljungman P, Hakki M, Boeckh M . Cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2010; 24: 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Duval M, Klein JP, He W, Cahn JY, Cairo M, Camitta BM et al. Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for acute leukemia in relapse or primary induction failure. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 3730–3738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee SJ, Klein J, Haagenson M, Baxter-Lowe LA, Confer DL, Eapen M et al. High-resolution donor-recipient HLA matching contributes to the success of unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Blood 2007; 110: 4576–4583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Crocchiolo R, Ciceri F, Fleischhauer K, Oneto R, Bruno B, Pollichieni S et al. HLA matching affects clinical outcome of adult patients undergoing haematopoietic SCT from unrelated donors: a study from the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo and Italian Bone Marrow Donor Registry. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 44: 571–577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rowe JM . Optimal induction and post-remission therapy for AML in first remission. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2009, 396–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lodewyck T, Cornelissen JJ . Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: a risk-adapted approach. Blood Rev 2008; 22: 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gratwohl A . Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2007; 20: 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gooley TA, Chien JW, Pergam SA, Hingorani S, Sorror ML, Boeckh M et al. Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2091–2101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Passweg J, Baldomero H, Stern M, Bargetzi M, Ghielmini M, Leibundgut K et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Switzerland: a comprehensive quality control report on centre effect. Swiss Med Wkly 2010; 140: 326–334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin MY, Hota B, Khan YM, Woeltje KF, Borlawsky TB, Doherty JA et al. Quality of traditional surveillance for public reporting of nosocomial bloodstream infection rates. JAMA 2010; 304: 2035–2041.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lokhorst H, Einsele H, Vesole D, Bruno B, San Miguel J, Pérez-Simon JA et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus statement regarding the current status of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 4521–4530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the great support provided by Helen Baldomero.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Gratwohl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gratwohl, A. The EBMT risk score. Bone Marrow Transplant 47, 749–756 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.110

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.110

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links